- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 575
- Reaction score
- 504
- Location
- The Tar Heel State
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
I'm no supporter of Bundy,but I have yet to see any pics of them putting woman and children in front of them....
And yet the first word out of your mouth was "Its BUSH'S fault", :lamoMopping up after other presidents failures is taking responsibility. Its very telling that anything that has to do with 'responsibility' seems to fly right over head. Very telling, indeed.
There aren't any. Supporters of Bundy told the media that they would put the women on the front lines if the conflict were to escalate.
Ironic that Liberals keep pounding on it like it happened while at the same time DEMANDING women assume combat roles in the military lol
Seriously. YOU and all these other people here that are rushing to defend the government action here...who claim that well...golly...it was the right thing to do.
And yet the first word out of your mouth was "Its BUSH'S fault", :lamo
Ironic that Liberals keep pounding on it like it happened while at the same time DEMANDING women assume combat roles in the military lol
So in your view women in combat = using women as shields? Really?
You won't go too far here denying the obvious, that Wright and Farrakhan are racists... hell the Commi-Libs don't even try.
I think you might do better at Democratic Underground
So in your view women in combat = using women as shields? Really?
So...the administration is kinda screwed then. According to you and people like you...that was it, man. That was the best thing to do. The right thing to do. And they failed miserably. So...NOW what? You dont think they might have to actually come up with some OTHER idea that might actually be EFFECTIVE and not make the administration look even MORE clownlike in their failure to deal with a scofflaw cattle rancher in the Nevada desert, do you?
I never read the NYT article.. In fact I never read the NYT at all. I came to my conclusions that Bundy is a racist by watching his unedited video and reading the unedited transcript.LOL... no... but the government has done a bang-up job giving "assistance."
Just look at the enslaving rot it has created. Or are you unfamiliar of what a tremendous job government and its community organizers have done? Which was Bundy's point... clearly evident except for those who prefer to defend their being mislead by the vile and deplorable NYT.
The message was one of compassion, respect and disgust for the plight of people enslaved by a government that has done tremendous damage.
I wonder... did Obama's mentor and his best buddy, two racists... disgust you enough not to vote for him twice?
Why do you support someone mentored by a racist?
Ironic that Liberals keep pounding on it like it happened while at the same time DEMANDING women assume combat roles in the military lol
The call for women in combat came from the women soldiers. The Bundy "militia" was threatening Taliban tactics of using women and children as human shields which is quite different. No surprise though since they are nothing but terrorists after all.
Just in the context of Bundy's statement, "let me tell you something else about the negro" in of itself is stereotype language. Why other people can't see that I do not know.I never read the NYT article.. In fact I never read the NYT at all. I came to my conclusions that Bundy is a racist by watching his unedited video and reading the unedited transcript.
There is nothing racist about our current President.
Most of the people on welfare began to receive assistance before President Obama was sworn in, so perhaps your argument is with past presidents...Ooooo but wait ... they weren't black men were they? ...Ha!
Most of the people who receive assistance are poor white children.
Does it bother you one Iota the Bundy prefaced his comments that day by saying;
"let me tell you something else about the Negro"
All comments he made after that were made about all people who have dark skin pigmentation.
Does that kind of racist language bother you at all?
I never read the NYT article.. In fact I never read the NYT at all. I came to my conclusions that Bundy is a racist by watching his unedited video and reading the unedited transcript.
There is nothing racist about our current President.
Most of the people on welfare began to receive assistance before President Obama was sworn in, so perhaps your argument is with past presidents...Ooooo but wait ... they weren't black men were they? ...Ha!
Most of the people who receive assistance are poor white children.
Does it bother you one Iota the Bundy prefaced his comments that day by saying;
"let me tell you something else about the Negro"
All comments he made after that were made about all people who have dark skin pigmentation.
Does that kind of racist language bother you at all?
So you would agree then that Occupy Wallstreet is a domestic terrorist organisation considering they actually DID use human shields right?
Do you think then that restoring rule of law to this area of Nevada is important and worth the cost?
So you would agree then that Occupy Wallstreet is a domestic terrorist organisation considering they actually DID use human shields right?
Really? Next you'll be saying they had snipers on overpasses too.
Those who compare Bundy supporters to domestic terrorists do so because they have encouraged violent resistance. I don't recall the OWS movement having guns drawn on law enforcement.
1-Ive given NUMEROUS options and 2-maybe I'm mistaken...but didnt you yourself say you didnt agree with the administrations actions?You were rather quick to criticize the administration's handling of this, and yet you have no answers. Typical of your ilk.
Nope,I don't think I said that at all.
Oh no...dont misunderstand me. I WANT you to keep repeating that same mindless mantra. Clinton ignored it, the Obama admin ignored it for 5 years...and all you have is "But...but...George Bush!!! George Bush!!!" :lamoThat's right.....Obama is doing what Bush failed to do. How many times do you need it repeated before you understand?
Have you listened to Sean Hanity's disertation about Bundy's racism? He never mentioned the "left" and that is funny ...He usually does.They did not run away from any racist. They ran because they believed the spin placed on it by the left, which has thoroughly been discredited by what he actually said.
Bundy was, and is, judged on the content of his own words.And as there isn't any vile racist stink, your thinking, like the propaganda they bought into, is wrong and the only stink.
Arbiter? no ...informed observer ? Yes.You are hardly the arbiter of what a smart republican is.
The observations of Bundy's racism are coming from Right Left and Center. It is practically unanimous.If the idiots on the left would stop making their false claims, there would be no problem.
Would you go on record saying anything negative about a man who personally employs you?Os vey! This comment flies in the face of what was actually said by him, and by what a black person who knows him a hell of a lot better than you do has said of him.
Bundy prefaced his comments with the phrase;No one is defending a racist.
Since you do not seem to understand that, point out where he said his race was better than others.
But since we know you can, stop with your false claims of racism.
Outside of you? there are not many.No one is defending a racist.
I need not bully anyone.! iLOL
Let's see.
You make false claims of racism, can't back it up, and just because I point out the claims are false, you then try and bully me.
It figures. This is typical behavior of those pushing false narratives/claims.
You can created all the false memories you want.
.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?