• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Clinton's "Tell" (1 Viewer)

dsanthony

Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2006
Messages
199
Reaction score
0
Location
Las Vegas
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
During the height of Lewinskygate, CNN had a "Body Language Expert" on to judge Bill Clinton's statement that "I did not have sexual language with that woman". Sorry I can't find the link now, but the info is available in any book on body language. The expert said that Clinton's anger and especially his finger-pointing were a "tell" or a common device people used when lying.

I found a YouTube link of that speech. I invite anyone to compare his "body language" with his performance on FOX Sunday tomorrow. Like any poor poker player, Clinton gives away his hand in both videos.

http://www.youtube.com/v/nP5FunbZvJ8
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It seems like you posted the same link twice.

I'm skeptical of this expert affirming that as fact, since everything i've read indicates that hand motions and eye movement are a difficult tells because there are so many reasons to use them all
 
Morrow said:
It seems like you posted the same link twice.

I'm skeptical of this expert affirming that as fact, since everything i've read indicates that hand motions and eye movement are a difficult tells because there are so many reasons to use them all

Just go to the thread "Clinton Freaks Out" and look at the video of the Wallace interview and then compare it to the secound video link posted a few post down.
 
Interesting how all the corporate news programs focused on Clinton getting angry, but did not cover what he actually said! Typical! :roll: What else is new! You have to go out of the country to get unbaised news! Our own U.S. magazines print different versions for out of the country that are less timid! The joke is that we think only other countries have censorship! Here it is just slicker in the way we push real news to the margins so it's hard to find! Of course fascism could never occur here!!! :confused:
 
I think Clinton has been caught in so many lies that not many people bother to listen to what he says anymore.

dsanthony, you fogot another one of his 'Tells':
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...his lips move!
(C'Mon, it's a JOKE - lighten up, people!)
 
Mr. D said:
Interesting how all the corporate news programs focused on Clinton getting angry, but did not cover what he actually said! Typical! :roll: What else is new!

FOX covered it in some detail pointing out the lies he was again engaged in.
 
Stinger said:
FOX covered it in some detail pointing out the lies he was again engaged in.

FOX?

No! Say it ain't so! :rofl

Tru dat tho'. When Clinton's lips are moving, it's a sure bet he's lying out his arse.
 
Captain America said:
FOX?

No! Say it ain't so! :rofl

Tru dat tho'. When Clinton's lips are moving, it's a sure bet he's lying out his arse.

Yes if you watched it you to would be fully informed.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom