johnnyboy
New member
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2006
- Messages
- 8
- Reaction score
- 0
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Private
Clinton's dramatic claim to have also integrated a segregated bus on that same "fateful day" as Rosa Parks failed the smell test, I'm sure, for many, but went largely unchallenged. There are some problems with his story, however.
For one thing, the arrest warrant, ( from the national archives ), was written up at 6;06 p.m., too late for the newspapers that day.
Secondly, what seems important in retrospect, could hardly have seemed important at the time. As things stood on the evening of December 1, 1955, the situation seemed painfully reminiscent of the mythical headline of the we-can-make-news-out-of-anything school of journalism: !!!!! MAN IN ALBANY MISSES BUS !!!!!! The hometown newspaper, "The Montgomery Advertiser" didn't carry any reference to the event until five days after that "fateful day", so how did little nine year old Bill Clinton know about it on that fateful day?
Does this matter? If not, why did every major news organization in the country carry his remarks? If it does matter, why didn't they check up on his story.
I'm not talking about bias here, biased reporting can still be accurate and responsible. The fact that nobody checked up on Clinton's latest whopper is less than biased. It is sloppy and gullible reporting, to point of being an accessory to compulsive humbug.
For more info and sources you can visit a blog on the am 1280 THE PATRIOT website, go to DISCUSS , click NEWS STAND, , click CLINTON'S EULOGY.
For one thing, the arrest warrant, ( from the national archives ), was written up at 6;06 p.m., too late for the newspapers that day.
Secondly, what seems important in retrospect, could hardly have seemed important at the time. As things stood on the evening of December 1, 1955, the situation seemed painfully reminiscent of the mythical headline of the we-can-make-news-out-of-anything school of journalism: !!!!! MAN IN ALBANY MISSES BUS !!!!!! The hometown newspaper, "The Montgomery Advertiser" didn't carry any reference to the event until five days after that "fateful day", so how did little nine year old Bill Clinton know about it on that fateful day?
Does this matter? If not, why did every major news organization in the country carry his remarks? If it does matter, why didn't they check up on his story.
I'm not talking about bias here, biased reporting can still be accurate and responsible. The fact that nobody checked up on Clinton's latest whopper is less than biased. It is sloppy and gullible reporting, to point of being an accessory to compulsive humbug.
For more info and sources you can visit a blog on the am 1280 THE PATRIOT website, go to DISCUSS , click NEWS STAND, , click CLINTON'S EULOGY.