- Joined
- Apr 11, 2011
- Messages
- 13,350
- Reaction score
- 6,591
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
No, she's obviously careless. That piece of information was extraneous and irrelevant; therefore only put out to show off her credentials. Good OPSEC practices would have suggested not revealing the information. It was at least sensitive, and she showed poor judgement given her recent position in the govt.
It's what they carry in order to prove who they are when using the "football".
Everybody keeps their personal identifer in their pants. Well.... Everyone except Trump and Bill
Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
Who?And to the larger point: "And that's why 10 people who have had that awesome responsibility have come out and, in an unprecedented way, said they would not trust Donald Trump with the nuclear codes or to have his finger on the nuclear button."
Thankfully these are all apolitical opinionsAnd to the larger point: "And that's why 10 people who have had that awesome responsibility have come out and, in an unprecedented way, said they would not trust Donald Trump with the nuclear codes or to have his finger on the nuclear button."
At least her name aint trumpWhether it's illegal or not, it's certainly a very stupid thing to say in a public forum. Let alone a presidential debate.
Hillary's extreme bad judgment and lack of character on full display, yet again. :roll:
At least her name aint trump
Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
The possibility exists sure. But you don't know that. You dont know what clearance she had (and evidence suggests she doesn't have the real number). You don't know what the OPSEC practices are because I suspect that you aren't privy to their information either. Even if she did know that the number you don't know that she didnt give the popular answer (as found all over the internet) and not the real answer. And there are far more variables than those. The point is you dont know. You just disagree with her politics and the letter in front of her name. Its also worth pointing out that you shouldn't assume everything that is said in a debate. They are full of lies.
Also it is worth pointing out that the people who would hold her accountable if she had leaked that info, didn't seem to care about what she said.
What were you expecting, that they'd run out into the street and yell, "OMFG she gave away the keys to city!!!"?
It does not matter if its a crime or not.
You have to show intent for it to be reasonable to prosecute.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?