- Joined
- Oct 20, 2014
- Messages
- 12,199
- Reaction score
- 4,082
- Location
- #TrumpWasAnInsideJob
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
Is that your way of saying you can't answer?
Nope. Its my way of saying you can't take a joke. Since everything is up for debate with Clintonists, obviously you are contesting the fact that "is" is the third-person singular present of be. But, congratulations, your lack of a sense of humor and you and your types tendency to **** all over any inkling of a detraction from or criticism of (no matter how light-hearted, humorous, completely opposite of serious) the Clinton personality cult will continue to further cement, solidify, and empower those of us who see through the REAL bull****: that the Clintons are somehow impervious to making stupid comments, making mistakes, having questionable ethics, doing any wrong, and are these form of super-beings that any form of criticism of (again, no matter how light-hearted, humorous, completely opposite of serious) is to be automatically met with condescending dumbassery like this response:
Without googling -- define is.
As if the truth is subject to interpretation. This disconnect from reality and inability to process any form of criticism of the object of the personality worship is indicative, and a red-flag, towards massive cognitive dissonance in the likeness of Trump (only more severe and widespread) that is one of many problems facing this country - the inability of a voter base and demographic to think critically and allow real investigation into the unlawful tyranny of a superclass far removed from the laws which apply to the rest of us, and the standard to which all other governments are held - wherein the poorer nations that engage in voter purging and other voting suppression tactics are rightfully punished, but only to distance them from the blatantly obvious and arrogant, naked and raw, corruption indicative therein - for example: when Bill Clinton accepted a bribe via the Clinton Foundation from the Russians for acquisition of Uranium One (a quarter of America's URANIUM stock) and Bill's paid speech to Renaissance Capital, among other speeches...
...only to simultaneously use Russia as a red-herring to distract from damning DNC leaks. Or is the truth kind of like Bill Clinton's definition of "is", i.e. - the definition of the truth is subjective to the party exposing it? Why would you so blindly defend someone who says **** like that, and does **** like this?
Especially someone with utter disrespect for the truth, and an inability to admit mistakes. In other words: A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR