• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Clinton slams Coulter's 'vicious' put-down of some 9/11 widows (1 Viewer)

KidRocks

DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 17, 2005
Messages
1,337
Reaction score
16
Location
right here
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
What a pathetic excuse for a human being Coulter is, imagine what nerve she has to politize the deaths of some 9/11 victims just to quench her media driven, politically-correct, r-wing extremist agenda, Coulter and Pat Robertson have learned well.

No doubt she is catering to her extremist dittohead fan base by spewing her fascist, femi-nazi views.

Go Hillary, keep on kicking that vicious media-whore's *** all the way to the White House! :cool:






http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/06/07/coulter.911.widows.ap/index.html

WASHINGTON (AP) -- New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton lashed out at Ann Coulter for a "vicious, mean-spirited attack" on a group of outspoken 9/11 widows, whom the right-wing television pundit described as "self-obsessed" and enjoying their husbands' deaths.

Coulter writes in a new book, "Godless: The Church of Liberalism," that a group of New Jersey widows whose husbands perished in the World Trade Center act "as if the terrorist attacks happened only to them."

She also wrote, "I've never seen people enjoying their husbands' deaths so much." (Watch the reaction to Coulter's statements... -- 2:15)
 
KidRocks said:
What a pathetic excuse for a human being Coulter is, imagine what nerve she has to politize the deaths of some 9/11 victims just to quench her media driven, politically-correct, r-wing extremist agenda, Coulter and Pat Robertson have learned well.

No doubt she is catering to her extremist dittohead fan base by spewing her fascist, femi-nazi views.

Go Hillary, keep on kicking that vicious media-whore's *** all the way to the White House! :cool:






http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/06/07/coulter.911.widows.ap/index.html

WASHINGTON (AP) -- New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton lashed out at Ann Coulter for a "vicious, mean-spirited attack" on a group of outspoken 9/11 widows, whom the right-wing television pundit described as "self-obsessed" and enjoying their husbands' deaths.

Coulter writes in a new book, "Godless: The Church of Liberalism," that a group of New Jersey widows whose husbands perished in the World Trade Center act "as if the terrorist attacks happened only to them."

She also wrote, "I've never seen people enjoying their husbands' deaths so much." (Watch the reaction to Coulter's statements... -- 2:15)
Coulter needs to get a good lay from a liberal lol. That will get her head out of her a$$ :mrgreen:
 
jfuh said:
Coulter needs to get a good lay from a liberal lol. That will get her head out of her a$$ :mrgreen:

Coulter got a lay alright. It was from Satan himself.
 
jfuh said:
Coulter needs to get a good lay from a liberal lol. That will get her head out of her a$$ :mrgreen:

I think most libs are smart enough to be weary of sex with a chick with an Adams Apple.
 
SouthernDemocrat said:
I think most libs are smart enough to be weary of sex with a chick with an Adams Apple.
:lamo: Beer goggles go quite a distance.
 
Why did the major networks give this hate monger wall to wall coverage and a forum for her to spit on the graves of those who dies on 9/11?

Slandering 9/11 widows and calling herself a Christian warrior? Yeah, that's what Jesus would do....

Unbelievable.
 
Ann Coulter is definately the bottom of the barrel when it comes to politcal pundits. Anyone who would write books specifically to divide a population and turn them against each other doesn't deserve to be heard through national media.
 
python416 said:
Ann Coulter is definately the bottom of the barrel when it comes to politcal pundits. Anyone who would write books specifically to divide a population and turn them against each other doesn't deserve to be heard through national media.

The thing is, she is nothing but another hatemongering nut job. What is more disturbing is the fact that her books sell well with right wingers. It would seem that there is a significant appetite for hate on that end of the spectrum.
 
Ann Coulter has described herself as the spokesman of the "Christian" community. Once again....another example of "Christians" who have absolutely nothing to do with the teachings of Christ.....another example of "Christians" who love using the label but are in actuality nothing but a bunch of Pharisees
 
Unfortunately, I believe Coulter represents the conservative base of today. People may label her as a far right wing nut, but most conservatives, IMHO, walk hand in hand with her.
 
Hoot said:
Unfortunately, I believe Coulter represents the conservative base of today. People may label her as a far right wing nut, but most conservatives, IMHO, walk hand in hand with her.

Of course they do, why else would her books sell so well to them.
 
SouthernDemocrat said:
The thing is, she is nothing but another hatemongering nut job. What is more disturbing is the fact that her books sell well with right wingers. It would seem that there is a significant appetite for hate on that end of the spectrum.

Ya think? :doh

Heck, people of her type can't even post on an internet forum without being pricks. It must be something in their water.:confused:
 
SouthernDemocrat said:
Of course they do, why else would her books sell so well to them.

I have all the sympathy in the world for anyone that lost loved ones in the attack on the Twin Towers unlike that Whacko Leader of the left Ward Chamberlain who compared the survivors to little nazis.........That said, these 4 widows have become political figures.....They campaigned for Kerry in the 2004 elections and had special seats at the DNC Convention......They have constantly criticized the president and his administration.......In my opinion they belong in the same boat with Cindy Sheehan.....
 
Navy Pride said:
I have all the sympathy in the world for anyone that lost loved ones in the attack on the Twin Towers unlike that Whacko Leader of the left Ward Chamberlain who compared the survivors to little nazis.........That said, these 4 widows have become political figures.....They campaigned for Kerry in the 2004 elections and had special seats at the DNC Convention......They have constantly criticized the president and his administration.......In my opinion they belong in the same boat with Cindy Sheehan.....

I agree. Just because you lose someone in a tragic way does not make you a political leader and/or enhance your intelligence towards politics in anyway. These women should be seen the same as Cindy Sheehan, an American civilian who lost somenoe close to them and is lashing out at those who they see in charge of killing their loved one. Once the pain subsides they will step away.

I think Ann Coulter is a "Whacko" who's only rebuttal is personal attacks towards those she is aiming. She always seems to try and demote the character of the person(s) instead of actually attacking the subject of discussion.
 
KidRocks said:
What a pathetic excuse for a human being Coulter is, imagine what nerve she has to politize the deaths of some 9/11 victims

Not defending Coulter, but she has a point - there are some out there who are politicizing their own family members' loss/death, using it for political attacks against people.

Cindy Sheehan was a prime example. Her son chose a life of defending this country by/through serving in the military - his own decision. After his death, Cindy Sheehan went on a self-absorbed propoganda tirade, funded by partes with political agendas hell-bent on using her to attack Bush and others and to further their own agenda. Sheehan's 'cause' quickly became about herself and not about her son! She even met with Chavez and was photographed/recorded saying she wished chavez, who advocated the overthrow of this country in that interview, could be our President! You think her son, who loved this country enough to sacrifice his own life for it, would approve oh his mother using HIS name and HIS death in such a way? He!! NO!

KidRocks said:
Coulter writes, "I've never seen people enjoying their husbands' deaths so much." (Watch the reaction to Coulter's statements... -- 2:15)

I cannot condone Coulter's attack or the use of the word 'enjoying'. I think Sheehan began to 'enjoy' the media attention and the free trips, etc paid for by liberals and others - the significnce of her son's death being lost in the media attention and money, and other attention.

Coulter has made a lot of sense in the past, a lot of valid points, but she has also made some blunders, IMO. If you base your points/arguments on fact, then not many people can say anything against you. When you turn to attacking/demnizing your opponents or others, committing personal attacks, suddenly no one is willing to hear another thing you say and all the great facts and proof you have presented is lost.

If I had lost anyone in 9/11, though, I could not see how I could blame anyone but the terrorists who committed the acts. The Islamic extremists have declared Holy War on the world, starting with Bin Laden's declaration of war against us in 1995. Bin Ladem, Zarqawi, and even the Iranian leader have all declared that there is a war going on - Muslims against the rest of the world, a war they intend to win. The believe that you either convert to Muslim or you are an infidel who HAS to die!

I think in their grief, and in the midst of all the partisan political war for votes/money by our politicians and the party-1st Americans, the widows and others have lost sight of that fact. As a result, we have been reveverted to attacking each other instead of seeing the real enemy that has promised to kill us all and end our way of life.

Coulter may be trying to remind people who the enemy really is, but she is also guilty, IMO, of attacking her political opponent viciously and relishes the blow she has struck. If I have to rally my troops when my base comes under attack, I do not attempt to set one group against the other in order to rally them as a whole. I focus the whole on the enemy at hand outside the gates - our common enemy.

Unfortunately, our own politicians - both parties - have become our enemies, almost as dangerous as the Islamic extremists. 1 group claims 'support the war or you're not American', the other attacks our troops and the nation's resolve, and both attempt to sell America's future to illegal immigrants in exchange for immediate cash and votes! They no longer listen to us - they believe they only have to pander to us during election years and ignore us the rest of the time!
 
Last edited:
What I hear some on this topic saying is that if you lose a loved one in a terrorist attack or war you have no right to speak out. You should sit back and shut up and not express your views. That is absolutely crazy.
Ann Coulter and anyone else for that matter have every right to attack their views. It is the personal attacks on their character, ala swiftboaters that people are criticizing Ann for.

Saying that they are wrong in their portrayal of Bush or the war or the administrations foreign policy is one thing and would be within legitimate criticism.
Saying that they find joy in their loved ones death is outrageous and cheap rhetoric
 
Gibberish said:
I agree. Just because you lose someone in a tragic way does not make you a political leader and/or enhance your intelligence towards politics in anyway. These women should be seen the same as Cindy Sheehan, an American civilian who lost somenoe close to them and is lashing out at those who they see in charge of killing their loved one. Once the pain subsides they will step away.

I think Ann Coulter is a "Whacko" who's only rebuttal is personal attacks towards those she is aiming. She always seems to try and demote the character of the person(s) instead of actually attacking the subject of discussion.

I just hope your consistent and criticize left wing whackos like Moore and Chamberlain the same way.......
 
For the record:

disneydude said:
What I hear some on this topic saying is that if you lose a loved one in a terrorist attack or war you have no right to speak out. You should sit back and shut up and not express your views. That is absolutely crazy.
I totally agree!

disneydude said:
Saying that they are wrong in their portrayal of Bush or the war or the administrations foreign policy is one thing and would be within legitimate criticism.
That is what I am saying, as well.

disneydude said:
Saying that they find joy in their loved ones death is outrageous and cheap rhetoric
I couldn't agree with you more!

And in the immortal words of NavyPride:
NavyPride said:
I just hope your consistent and criticize left wing whackos like Moore and Chamberlain the same way.......
 
All those fanaticals are nuts and there is no length to how low they will go to push their agendas. Coulter is just one crazy *** bitch that most sensible people do not take seriously. Whenever I hear her clucking it's like fingernails on a chalkboard.
 
Navy Pride said:
I just hope your consistent and criticize left wing whackos like Moore and Chamberlain the same way.......

Of course. I see Moore as nothing but an entertainer. He twists the facts and many times makes up his own to complete his agenda. He is as bad a face for the left as Pat Robertson is for ther right. When I first saw Roger and Me I was rolling on the floor laughing at how bad he was twisting the facts, and I was only in highschool. I have not had much experience with Chamberlain so I cannot comment on him.
 
Last edited:
Gibberish said:
Of course. I see Moore as nothing but an entertainer. He twists the facts and many times makes up his own to complete his agenda. He is as bad a face for the left as Pat Robertson is for ther right. I have not had much experience with Chamberlain so I cannot comment on him.

Well let me bring you up to date on Chamberlain..........He called the survivors of the people who died on 9/11 little nazia..........
 
Navy Pride said:
Well let me bring you up to date on Chamberlain..........He called the survivors of the people who died on 9/11 little nazia..........

I am going to have to look that one up. I cannot in anyway see how someone could compare those that died in a terrorist attack to the Nazi party. Not saying that he didn't, I just need to find out what his explanation of logic was.
 
These women have used the deaths of their husbands as a step stool to their political soap boxes. They are fair game.

Maybe cindy Sheehan should have cared more for her son while he was alive.
Actaully raising him would have been a start.
 
I hate Clinton and Coulter. If I wake up one day, and find something that I agree with any of them on, I'll jump of the empire state building and hope to catch my eyelid on a nail.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom