• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Clinton launches presidential bid

This is how it is going to go down:
  • Clinton is the most qualified of all the candidates out there (with the possible exception of Gore) to run the country
  • She would be an even better President than her husband was (due to the intelligence factor: she's smarter than Bill and was probably running the country all along back then while he took the credit!)
  • Republicans are waiting for their candidates to post bail
  • Obama is a good orator, but has done absolutely nothing on a national scale (he's still a newbie)
  • Clinton will win with Obama becoming her Vice-President
We had 8 great years the last time a Clinton was in the White House. But the way conservatives around here that only watch from a specialized feed known as Stingervision, say Clinton's years of prosperity during his Administration was due to the previous one. I wonder what they will say, when Hillary turns around this deadend train heading for the destruction of the American way, around? What will they say then? Because if we become respected around the world (again) under the Clinton II Presidency, the last thing you could say was it was due to the Bush Administration.
 
CurrentAffairs said:
:eek: Wow, I'm completely shocked.

I sure didn't see this coming. :roll:
Click to expand...

This will be hilarious, already her smear machine is after Obama, will her opponents ask her the hard questions about her background? Will the MSM?
 
Originally posted by CurrentAffairs:
Which ones? Newt? Rudy? McCain? Who are you referring to?
Click to expand...
I was being facetious on that one.

In all likelyhood, if the Democrats don't start doing what they were elected to do in this past election, which is start Senate level hearings on the conduct and actions of the current Adminstration, I will be voting Republican in '08.

And the only reason for that would be, not because I like Republicans, but because I will so angry at the Democrats for letting us down when they had the chance to make a difference.

Now CurrentAffairs might have you think he is the one to thank...
 
Billo_Really said:
I was being facetious on that one.

In all likelyhood, if the Democrats don't start doing what they were elected to do in this past election, which is start Senate level hearings on the conduct and actions of the current Adminstration, I will be voting Republican in '08.
Click to expand...

I love keeping you honest. :2razz:
 
Originally posted by CurrentAffairs
I love keeping you honest
Click to expand...
You give yourself far too much credit.

And don't interrupt!

I wasn't finished...
 
Billo_Really said:
Republicans are waiting for their candidates to post bail
Click to expand...
Tooooo Funny.....:poke
Billo_Really said:
What will they say then? Because if we become respected around the world (again) under the Clinton II Presidency, the last thing you could say was it was due to the Bush Administration.
Click to expand...
You obviously underestimate the GW apologists spinmeisters...they can twist a turd into a pretzel..:lol:
 
Oh...Bush Apologists can do magic? Damn.
And this is just more of Hillarys crap.Yay.
Obama wins.
 
Thank you God..........My prayers have been answered.....;)

Now if she only can get the nomination
 
Navy Pride said:
Thank you God..........My prayers have been answered.....;)

Now if she only can get the nomination
Click to expand...

I won't let it happen, Navy Pride! *stomps her feet in anger*
 
Navy Pride said:
Come on aps, don't spoi:2wavel my day.........:2wave:
Click to expand...

Oooh, but it's okay for you to spoil my day. I see the way this friendship works. ;)

Hillary won't get the nomination. She's too polarizing. :2wave:
 
aps said:
Oooh, but it's okay for you to spoil my day. I see the way this friendship works. ;)

Hillary won't get the nomination. She's too polarizing. :2wave:
Click to expand...

I so hope you are right. I think that Hillary would be a great president. But, I oppose her candidacy. The Republicans have won this round of political tactics, and made her unelectable.

I have decided I will likely support Obama. Inexperienced but Charismatic.
 
Dezaad said:
I so hope you are right. I think that Hillary would be a great president. But, I oppose her candidacy. The Republicans have won this round of political tactics, and made her unelectable.

I have decided I will likely support Obama. Inexperienced but Charismatic.
Click to expand...

ME TOO, Dezaad! I still want to learn more about him before making my final decision. I really like Chris Dodd, but I don't think he is winnable. Obama has this way about him that is just so impressive. Everyone thought that HW would get a 2nd term, but Bill Clinton came out and charmed people like nobody's business. Obama has a similar way about him. Let's watch and see what happens.
 
aps said:
I still want to learn more about him before making my final decision.
Click to expand...
Me too. Like what he stands for? What makes him think he is experienced enough? Why his middle name is Hussein?
 
Dezaad said:
I so hope you are right. I think that Hillary would be a great president.
Click to expand...

Why? What has she ever done?

But, I oppose her candidacy. The Republicans have won this round of political tactics, and made her unelectable.
Click to expand...

How? It's merely the fact that she is who she is.

I have decided I will likely support Obama. Inexperienced but Charismatic.
Click to expand...

What a great reason to make someone the leader of the country.:confused:
 
Hussein is scary......In this time when we are facing the biggest challenge in this country's history I don't want someone president who is still wet behind the ears........
 
CurrentAffairs said:
That sounds like a solid plan. :boom
Click to expand...

Nice cheap shot. It reveals more about you than it does me, however. What is the word someone uses to describe people who try to 'win' arguments through attacking the casual remarks of their opponents? I will trust the readers to apply appropriate labels to you.

Obama's actions concerning crime

Obama's actions concerning Defense

Obama's actions concerning Education

Obama's actions concerning the Environment

Obama's actions concerning Health Care

Obama's actions concerning Homeland Security

Obama's actions concerning Immigration

Obama's views on Iraq

Obama's actions concerning Veterans

Concerning Hillary (the topic of the thread), She has many of the same views as Obama, and is equally intelligent. However, the reasons she would not be good for this country is that she has become too divisive. I do not believe that she is deserving of this status, but it remains the truth nevertheless. For this reason, it is unlikely that I could vote for her over the Republican candidates so far. However, due to the influence of the religious right, I am not at all comfortable voting for any Republican candidate, but this will remain to be seen. If the Republican can make it to the nomination, and through the election without making promises to the religious right, I would almost certainly vote for the Republican over Hillary. To be clear, it is unlikely that I will vote for any candidate that the religious right is comfortable with.

I am ambiguous because so much is still up in the air.
 
Navy Pride said:
Thank you God..........My prayers have been answered.....;)

Now if she only can get the nomination
Click to expand...

Based on Navy's demonstrated talent for predicting American politics, I'd say that this post is a great sign for Clinton.

Now if she can only get Pride to predict that she'll lose the election, it'll be a lock.
 
Navy Pride said:
Hussein is scary......In this time when we are facing the biggest challenge in this country's history I don't want someone president who is still wet behind the ears........
Click to expand...

But didn't you vote for Bush in '00 and '04?
 
Dezaad said:
Nice cheap shot. It reveals more about you than it does me, however. What is the word someone uses to describe people who try to 'win' arguments through attacking the casual remarks of their opponents? I will trust the readers to apply appropriate labels to you.

Obama's actions concerning crime

Obama's actions concerning Defense

Obama's actions concerning Education

Obama's actions concerning the Environment

Obama's actions concerning Health Care

Obama's actions concerning Homeland Security

Obama's actions concerning Immigration

Obama's views on Iraq

Obama's actions concerning Veterans

Concerning Hillary (the topic of the thread), She has many of the same views as Obama, and is equally intelligent. However, the reasons she would not be good for this country is that she has become too divisive. I do not believe that she is deserving of this status, but it remains the truth nevertheless. For this reason, it is unlikely that I could vote for her over the Republican candidates so far. However, due to the influence of the religious right, I am not at all comfortable voting for any Republican candidate, but this will remain to be seen. If the Republican can make it to the nomination, and through the election without making promises to the religious right, I would almost certainly vote for the Republican over Hillary. To be clear, it is unlikely that I will vote for any candidate that the religious right is comfortable with.

I am ambiguous because so much is still up in the air.
Click to expand...

The "devisive" thing is probably as much a product of the conservative machine as reality. Anyone the Dems put up will be devisive to them. I agree Clinton will be devisive to many Republicans, and not a few simply because she is a woman.

But she has show her ability to work with Repubicans in the Senate. I think she could as president. The "devisive" is mostly a Republican tactic to derail her canidacy. They did the same to Dean, and Kerry, and whoever the Dems put up.

So **** 'em. I almost want Clinton just because it will make some of them (included a few here) apoplectic.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom