- Joined
- Aug 17, 2005
- Messages
- 20,915
- Reaction score
- 546
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
Unless you have been living under a rock for the last month or so you have heard the story of the able danger operation that is said to have identified five of the nineteen 9-11 hijackers (including the supposed ringleader Mohammad Atta) nearly a year before that fateful day of 2001. Furthermore, this information was blocked from being shared with the F.B.I. because of the wall that existed b/w that organization and the intelligent community as a result of the Clinton-Gorelick wall which was proposed by former deputy attorney general Jamie Gorelick. So why would such an obviously idiotic policy be enacted in the first place? It is my contention that it was a direct result of Clinton attempting to block any serious investigation into the illegal campaign contributions given to him by agents of Red China (9-11 can be said to have been collateral damage in the Clinton ass saving campaign). So why was it that this information was not presented in the 9-11 commission report? Very simple because Jamie Gorelick was (as a member of the 911 commission) in an excellent position to block such inquiries. If you recall the 9-11 commission was a totally bi-partisan body, however, each party was able to select its own representatives in the commission. So why would the Democrats have selected Gorelick as a member of the commission knowing full well that she would be a major focus of any investigation of possible wrong doing by the Clinton administration? . . . can you say cover up any one? I knew that you could.