• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Clinton Delegate Explains How Democrats Will Ban All Guns

Because as an agenda, it's nowhere to be found.

Where would you look for gun controls agenda? Where would you look for Obama's agenda? Where would you look for Billiary's agenda?

Don't keep me in suspense. The same place Excon's agenda was? The Una bombers agenda was? The same place Ted Bundy's agenda was?
 
uh if the bannerrhoids really believed NRA members were as dangerous and liable to kill as they claim, they sure as hell wouldn't publicly insult a group they truly feared would kill them for the slightest of reasons. The fact that the bannerrhoids openly, patently, and frequently slander and lie about the NRA proves that the bannerrhoids understand that the vast majority of NRA members are law abiding people who require far far more than insults and lies to react violently

What a pity it would be nice if they got up and peed on those idiots battery with some like insults. What are they other than animators of metal and merchants of death? The sick uncaring mental deficients that mercilessly want to disarm the victims of crime and bask in the blood of victims to further their cause.
 
The insane fears in that... people are that stupid??

that is the hypocrisy of the left. They rant against Trump for painting this ugly picture of America, but for decades they have done the same frigging thing.
 
More than one measly delegate.

The past voting record of the party in gun control laws speaks for the party. Is there a gun control law democrats did not like?
 
So how many politicians does it take to say it out loud then?

Hitler, Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot, Idi Amin and a number of others would have said only one. But bans are just a natural end to a fear and hate driven agenda. Neither fear nor hatred can be appeased. Therefore it should come as no surprise no gun control advocate will ever claim give us this and we go way. They will not go away until there is no more they can do about what they fear and hate.

Best we figure it would be better to start fighting now than hoping gun control can be appeased or will get tired
 
The past voting record of the party in gun control laws speaks for the party. Is there a gun control law democrats did not like?

Regulations of fire arms does not automatically equate to "ban all guns"
 
Regulations of fire arms does not automatically equate to "ban all guns"

thinking that the way to keep criminals from getting something they currently cannot legally own, is to ban possession of those things by honest people is the mindset of a gun banner. most people are smart enough to know that a politician running for president, cannot come out and demand a complete gun ban and survive politically. So she and her minions will ask merely for the next step and then the next and so forth. And people like you will either dishonestly pretend she doesn't want gun bans or you will be ignorant of her real goals
 
thinking that the way to keep criminals from getting something they currently cannot legally own, is to ban possession of those things by honest people is the mindset of a gun banner. most people are smart enough to know that a politician running for president, cannot come out and demand a complete gun ban and survive politically. So she and her minions will ask merely for the next step and then the next and so forth. And people like you will either dishonestly pretend she doesn't want gun bans or you will be ignorant of her real goals

The slippery slope argument?
 
There is no progressive agenda to disarm Americans.

And yet I know so many democrats who want a complete ban on ALL firearms.


Sent from my grapefruit using smoke signals.
 
are you aware of the laws recently passed in several Democrat run states? sure sounds like the goal is complete bans

So yes. You are going with the slippery slope argument.
 
They are counting on their supporters being as vapid and empty headed as they think they are. "All we need is common sense gun control laws. How can anyone be against comm sense gun control laws? If we only had more common sense gun control laws we could end this senseless violence! Thats why we need more common sense gun control laws!"

And their little empty headed muppets bob their heads in agreement.
 
So yes. You are going with the slippery slope argument.

you seem to think merely calling some thing a slippery slope argument refutes it

that is a major fail on your part
 
They are counting on their supporters being as vapid and empty headed as they think they are. "All we need is common sense gun control laws. How can anyone be against comm sense gun control laws? If we only had more common sense gun control laws we could end this senseless violence! Thats why we need more common sense gun control laws!"

And their little empty headed muppets bob their heads in agreement.

pandering to the low wattage but loud bleating sheeple is half the motivation of the bannerrhoid movement.
 
So yes. You are going with the slippery slope argument.

We all know any "controls" they implement will not stop the killings so additional "controls" will be sought. Its not really a slippery slop argument it is a slippery slope fact.
 
The slippery slope argument?


It is a fallacy to believe the argument is not valid simply because you claim it is a slippery slope. It is exactly how gun bans occured in the very nations held in high regard as gun control examples by gun control Prohibitionists here in the U.S.
 
So yes. You are going with the slippery slope argument.

As opposed to a slippery slope plan. Are you saying the concerns can automatically be dismissed because they are part of a "slippery slope"? To believe the slippery slope is automatically invalid is a fallacy.
 
They are counting on their supporters being as vapid and empty headed as they think they are. "All we need is common sense gun control laws. How can anyone be against comm sense gun control laws? If we only had more common sense gun control laws we could end this senseless violence! Thats why we need more common sense gun control laws!"

And their little empty headed muppets bob their heads in agreement.

It is a propaganda technique know as band waggoning. Some examples - Everyone agrees it is a good idea. All people support common sense restrictions.

Everything gun control says or does is based on propaganda techniques.
 
Back
Top Bottom