- Joined
- Apr 18, 2013
- Messages
- 111,209
- Reaction score
- 101,523
- Location
- Barsoom
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
3/15/19
India, South Korea, Australia and the US are among the countries where teenagers are already on strike. The day of action is expected to embrace about 100 countries. They are inspired by Swedish teenager Greta Thunberg, who protests weekly outside Sweden's parliament. Scientists say tougher measures are needed to cut global warming. The globally co-ordinated children's protests - promoted through posts on Twitter and other social media - have been going on for several months. On Thursday Greta Thunberg's campaigning earned her a Nobel Peace Prize nomination. In January at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, the 16-year-old told top executives and politicians that "on climate change, we have to acknowledge that we have failed".
Climate strikes spread worldwide as students call for action
School pupils worldwide have abandoned classrooms for a day of protest against climate change.
Kudos to the next generation :thumbs:
Over 1.4 million marched on #SchoolStrike4Climate yesterday according to the latest update. 2,083 locations in 125 countries and on all continents. Pictured above; Montreal, Canada.
Climate strikes spread worldwide as students call for action
School pupils worldwide have abandoned classrooms for a day of protest against climate change.
Kudos to the next generation :thumbs:
Over 1.4 million marched on #SchoolStrike4Climate yesterday according to the latest update. 2,083 locations in 125 countries and on all continents. Pictured above; Montreal, Canada.
I don't think the climate gives a damn about what the students are doing. They may as well be protesting gravity.
Like a herd of sheep among a fad movement. Teenagers are emotional and go along with the group-think.
[FONT="][URL="https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/03/16/u-s-eu-energy-emissions-now-insignificant-to-global-energy-emissions-growth/"][/URL][/FONT]
[h=1]U.S., EU energy & emissions now insignificant to global energy & emissions growth[/h][FONT="][FONT=inherit]Guest essay by Larry Hamlin Climate alarmist propaganda activists and their supporting media here in the U.S. and EU have perpetrated a badly flawed fiction that somehow the U.S. and EU have the ability to control how the rest of the world deals with future energy use and emissions growth. The hard and unequivocal reality…[/FONT]
[FONT=inherit][URL="https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/03/16/u-s-eu-energy-emissions-now-insignificant-to-global-energy-emissions-growth/"]Continue reading →[/URL][/FONT]
[/FONT]
How long have I been saying the rest of the world needs to control their emissions before we worry about ours any more?
It's not as simple as ypou say.US have greater opportunity not only to reduce C02 emission but also save money trough for example energy efficiency measure. Because US C02 emissions, energy use and electric power consumption per capita is more than double that of many other developed countries.
So?
So?
We have already done more than our fair share.US is also one of world's most innovative and biggest economy so American investments can have a huge impact then it comes to technological development and economy of scale of renewables and other technologies.
Also having countries, communinities, corporation and individuals leading the way in investing in renewables have drastically reduced the cost of renewables. So that renewables are starting to outcompete fossil fuels.
“A new report reveals 42% of global coal capacity is currently unprofitable, and the United States could save $78 billion by closing coal-fired power plants in line with the Paris Climate Accord’s climate goals. This industry-disrupting trend comes down to dollars and cents, as the cost of renewable energy dips below fossil fuel generation.
Across the U.S., renewable energy is beating coal on cost: The price to build new wind and solar has fallen below the cost of running existing coal-fired power plants in Red and Blue states. For example, Colorado’s Xcel will retire 660 megawatts (MW) of coal capacity ahead of schedule in favor of renewable sources and battery storage, and reduce costs in the process. Midwestern utility MidAmerican will be the first utility to reach 100% renewable energy by 2020 without increasing customer rates, and Indiana’s NIPSCO will replace 1.8 gigawatts (GW) of coal with wind and solar.”
There calculations are flawed in that solar and wind cannot generate on demand power. Get rid of the coal plants, and we will either pay significantly more for power as we add strage of some sort or another, or we will have an authoritarian rule dictating how much power we can use at what time.
“A new report reveals 42% of global coal capacity is currently unprofitable, and the United States could save $78 billion by closing coal-fired power plants in line with the Paris Climate Accord’s climate goals. This industry-disrupting trend comes down to dollars and cents, as the cost of renewable energy dips below fossil fuel generation.
Across the U.S., renewable energy is beating coal on cost: The price to build new wind and solar has fallen below the cost of running existing coal-fired power plants in Red and Blue states. For example, Colorado’s Xcel will retire 660 megawatts (MW) of coal capacity ahead of schedule in favor of renewable sources and battery storage, and reduce costs in the process. Midwestern utility MidAmerican will be the first utility to reach 100% renewable energy by 2020 without increasing customer rates, and Indiana’s NIPSCO will replace 1.8 gigawatts (GW) of coal with wind and solar.”
Plunging Prices Mean Building New Renewable Energy Is Cheaper Than Running Existing Coal
[FONT="][URL="https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/03/19/bjorn-lomborg-on-climate-strikes-normalization-of-extreme-language-reflects-decades-of-climate-change-alarmism/"][/URL][/FONT]
[h=1]Bjørn Lomborg on ‘climate strikes’ – normalization of extreme language reflects decades of climate-change alarmism[/h][FONT="][FONT=inherit]It is little wonder that kids are scared when grown-ups paint such a horrific picture of global warming. For starters, leading politicians and much of the media have prioritized climate change over other issues facing the planet. Last September, United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres described climate change as a “direct existential threat” that may become…[/FONT]
[FONT=inherit][URL="https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/03/19/bjorn-lomborg-on-climate-strikes-normalization-of-extreme-language-reflects-decades-of-climate-change-alarmism/"]Continue reading →[/URL][/FONT]
[/FONT]
Every day these oil-funded groups follow-up with these goofy articles to attempt to focus away from the latest news to mankind's greatest challenge of Climate Change. What does that tell you about the deep pockets of the oil industry, and their misinformation campaign?
What "oil-funded groups?"
Why? Even if all the catastrophic high end predictions were correct, do you think it would change the energy people have become used to?If the goofy crap comes out every day, it's funded. If it's funded against Climate Change, it's oil-funded.
Why? Even if all the catastrophic high end predictions were correct, do you think it would change the energy people have become used to?
The energy our modern society derives from hydrocarbons, is not some bad habit that can be stopped, but a requirement to our lifestyle.
People will continue to buy energy made from hydrocarbon sources, until something better is available.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?