LOL Bullshit.
This link alone cites 500 studies that contradict it.
notrickszone.com
Your link is a joke. Who are you trying to fool? You are trying WAAAY too hard. The only question is: why?
"One of our favorite rituals this time of year is to marvel at the collection of papers Kenneth Richard posts on NoTricksZone, claiming they represent a mortal blow to the consensus that burning fossil fuels causes climate change. This year, it’s “
over 400” studies that supposedly “support a skeptical position on climate alarm,” and like every year, that’s a stretch, and even if it weren’t, it’d still be insufficient to call the basics into question.
By Climate Denier Roundup
But if you’re unfamiliar with NoTricksZone, and are wondering if perhaps this list of studies is being published by a scientific organization as some sort of literature review, here’s a quick refresher. Past posts from the blog include
scobby-doo-esque anti-renewable and
alien planet conspiracy theories. It’s the sort of place where
losing a bet about warming only increases your conviction. It’s the sort of place that
claims the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown didn’t reduce pollution levels in Europe based on a map of pollution levels… in 2015. It’s also the sort of place where, if you’re Dr. Willie Soon, you can
accuse scientists talking about 2014 being the hottest year (at the time) of “
prostituting science.” Ironic, because just two months later the New York Times
reported Soon took a million dollars from the fossil fuel industry in exchange for his talents.
This is just the latest in a series of annual posts collecting supposed consensus-killers. For example, 2016’s list (published in early 2017) was a more robust 500 papers long, and even then was clearly using the same
classic tactics of prior years: misrepresenting findings, overplaying potential conclusions, focusing on minutiae and cherry-picking quotes. All the usual cheap tricks. Even if they were all accurate though, as we pointed out then, the 500 papers carefully curated over the course of the year are just a drop in the bucket of the full body of science –
just two days into 2017, there were already 3,550 “climate change” studies."
One of our favorite rituals this time of year is to marvel at the collection of papers Kenneth Richard posts on NoTricksZone, claiming they represent a mortal blow to the consensus that burning fossil fuels causes climate change. This year, it’s “over 400” studies that supposedly “support a...
redgreenandblue.org
_________________________________
The only question is: WHY are you doing this? WHY do you propogate misinformation, ignore so many legitimate sources, and glom on to these cheap, questionable sites to just support a foregone conclusion never really based on facts? What you hate your grandkids or something and want them to have a miserable life?
www.foxnews.com
