- Joined
- Oct 19, 2012
- Messages
- 12,029
- Reaction score
- 3,530
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
No, we don't have to deal with the problem. It would be a waste of resources to deal with a problem that doesn't exist.
The models have fundamentally failed in their first big test of 20 years of prospective observations after the initial predictions. There is no reason to think they will do any better in the next 20 years since they can't explain why the models failed and have made no significant improvement in the models. I think I know why the models failed; they have the water vapor feedback set way too high, but they steadfastly refuse to admit it. If they'd plugged in a more realistic figure for water vapor feedback the models would have made the correct prediction, but the whole alarmist schtick would have been spoiled since that would mean that climate sensitivity is nowhere near as high as they've been claiming.
In science if your theory fails to make useful predictions then it is useless and wrong. Back to the drawing board.
Wish it to the cornfield!
That's what I love about conservatives. Total denial.