• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Climate Change & Agenda 21

Pin dÁr

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 23, 2014
Messages
3,185
Reaction score
112
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
The whole climate change is a hoax of the highest order.

However, this scam is needed so that the "Agenda 21" by The U.N

can be implemented.

So, they have an excuse to take our last freedoms away,

build mega-cities, forbid to go in in nature, get rid of the car, the family,

travel by speedtrain, and on and on it goes.


You can get a good picture of agenda 21 by watching the Hunger Games movie!




And people fall for this climate change crap so easily.





However, more and more people are waking up to Agenda 21, now called agenda 2030.



Of courses the holes in the Climate Changes are soooo huge. because it is all one big hoax.


Ah well, Hitler knew allready how to do this.

"Make the lie big enough..."



So, all these whole Climate Change discussions in which Climate Change is taken

seriously is of course, very very ridiculous.
 
Watch the Hunger Games?

Well if our agenda 21 comes with Liam Hemsworth all I can say is, where's my bow and arrow?
 
Actual UN Agenda 21:

"Hey guys the environment is good and we should protect it so maybe think about doing that. If you want, I mean. No pressure, just sayin."
 
Funny, I don't see all the world domination stuff in there.

and is the word "paraphrase" in your vocabulary, by any chance?

LOL

Obviously, you didn't read any of it. Why should your opinion matter when you lack the information to provide it?

Here is an excerpt from Gores Agenda 21 presentation to the World Economic Forum:

Urban sprawl, defined here as the uncontrolled and excessive spatial expansion of cities, is one of the world’s most significant – and least well documented – market failures, leading to inefficient use of land, capital and other resources

Sprawl also tends to be unfair, since lower-income people, who rely more on walking, cycling and public transport, are less likely to benefit from the additional road infrastructure, for example, but still pick up the bill in higher utility and public service costs.

Cities can follow a different growth pathway to unlock a new wave of urban productivity. This alternative approach should be based on boosting resource productivity, to improve the efficiency of energy use and resilience to energy price volatility. And it would involve a broader shift to more compact, connected and coordinated urban growth.​


It's clear there are many things some people choose to deny. So who are the real deniers?
 
Last edited:
LOL

Obviously, you didn't read any of it. Why should your opinion matter when you lack the information to provide it?

Here is an excerpt from Gores Agenda 21 presentation to the World Economic Forum:
Urban sprawl, defined here as the uncontrolled and excessive spatial expansion of cities, is one of the world’s most significant – and least well documented – market failures, leading to inefficient use of land, capital and other resources

Sprawl also tends to be unfair, since lower-income people, who rely more on walking, cycling and public transport, are less likely to benefit from the additional road infrastructure, for example, but still pick up the bill in higher utility and public service costs.

Cities can follow a different growth pathway to unlock a new wave of urban productivity. This alternative approach should be based on boosting resource productivity, to improve the efficiency of energy use and resilience to energy price volatility. And it would involve a broader shift to more compact, connected and coordinated urban growth.​


It's clear there are many things some people choose to deny. So who are the real deniers?

What exactly is sinister about these three paragraphs?

Are you aware none of this is actually binding?
 
What exactly is sinister about these three paragraphs?

Are you aware none of this is actually binding?

All of it. There are many who will deny it, as they don't possess the intellectual curiosity and cognitive skills to understand what the Global Elite at the UN and Davos have planned for them.

Here is an example of how Socialist Progressives in California are attempting to apply the directives from the Global Command:

Cities resist regional plan to limit sprawl | San Francisco Public Press

Regional planners, long dismayed by environmentally destructive suburban sprawl, hope to turn a lot of the Bay Area into something more like San Francisco — walkable, BARTable and very energy efficient. But the “smart growth” renaissance — key to the state’s climate change goals — is facing stiff resistance from cities, and financial pressure from the cash-strapped California state government. Some experts say that on its current path, the plan is too unwieldy to reshape where and how we will live
 
All of it. There are many who will deny it, as they don't possess the intellectual curiosity and cognitive skills to understand what the Global Elite at the UN and Davos have planned for them.

Here is an example of how Socialist Progressives in California are attempting to apply the directives from the Global Command:

Cities resist regional plan to limit sprawl | San Francisco Public Press
Regional planners, long dismayed by environmentally destructive suburban sprawl, hope to turn a lot of the Bay Area into something more like San Francisco — walkable, BARTable and very energy efficient. But the “smart growth” renaissance — key to the state’s climate change goals — is facing stiff resistance from cities, and financial pressure from the cash-strapped California state government. Some experts say that on its current path, the plan is too unwieldy to reshape where and how we will live

More energy efficient and economically successful cities is a sinister agenda?
 
More energy efficient and economically successful cities is a sinister agenda?

LOL

Of course that is all you would see. Others see global powers seeking to determine where, and how, people are allowed to live. I guess it pays to focus on the sheep first. And to think, despite the evidence, some try to hide from the facts by calling these documented plans a conspiracy. Who is in denial again?
 
LOL

Of course that is all you would see. Others see global powers seeking to determine where, and how, people are allowed to live. I guess it pays to focus on the sheep first. And to think, despite the evidence, some try to hide from the facts by calling these documented plans a conspiracy. Who is in denial again?

At no point does that text suggest mandatory relocation.
 
At no point does that text suggest mandatory relocation.

Right.....:thumbs:

Why that would be unconstitutional.

Better to draft regulations that make it economically unfeasible to continue to expand suburbia.

Better yet, as proven by the Globalists in words and planned actions, make all suburban expansion economically unfeasible globally.

As Al Gore pointed out, "excessive spatial expansion of cities is one of the world’s most significant – and least well documented – market failures".

The UN's Agenda 21 details how to correct this crime globally, as the links to their own words I have provided prove.

Once again, your credibility is absent on this.

Please explain how Gores comments, and the language in the UN's Agenda 21, don't detail plans to concentrate populations in major cities, as the OP described.

If you chose to ignore this question, we are done.
 
Please explain how Gores comments, and the language in the UN's Agenda 21, don't detail plans to concentrate populations in major cities, as the OP described.

If you chose to ignore this question, we are done.

Because you're unable to actually describe the plans.
 
All of it. There are many who will deny it, as they don't possess the intellectual curiosity and cognitive skills to understand what the Global Elite at the UN and Davos have planned for them.

Here is an example of how Socialist Progressives in California are attempting to apply the directives from the Global Command:

Cities resist regional plan to limit sprawl | San Francisco Public Press

Regional planners, long dismayed by environmentally destructive suburban sprawl, hope to turn a lot of the Bay Area into something more like San Francisco — walkable, BARTable and very energy efficient. But the “smart growth” renaissance — key to the state’s climate change goals — is facing stiff resistance from cities, and financial pressure from the cash-strapped California state government. Some experts say that on its current path, the plan is too unwieldy to reshape where and how we will live

Thank you!!!
 
More energy efficient and economically successful cities is a sinister agenda?

That is the sale-pitch, mate! Please wake up!

A lot of Agenda 21 terms are: smart growth, sustainability, greeeeeeeeen,

smartphone (!!!) , smarttelevision etc etc All Agenda 21.

ALL designed by advertising agencies. Thjey sound sooo good, but they are hiding a very

sinsiter agenda.

It is all about CONTROL. That's why they want us in mega cities. Easier to control.

and out of the car and on the bike and speedtrain.or walking of course.

Furthermore you won't be allowed to tracel anymore, and eventually you can buy anything you

want at the place you are living.So, no need for traveling eh?!

And there they can even use the smart dust! tiny nano particles that can do about anything.

Creepy Creepy!
 
Last edited:
One can read this book:
817fjWsBC6L.jpg


f you've been wanting an interesting, clearly written, how-to-manual for identifying and fighting UN Agenda 21, here it is. Agenda 21--All the information you need to understand what is happening in your town, why it's happening, who is behind it, and what you can do to stop it. BEHIND THE GREEN MASK: U.N. Agenda 21 is 172 pages of truth. Part history, part current events, part hand-to-hand combat, and part blueprint for keeping your freedom, this is one book that you'll put to work immediately. Boots on the ground and all hands on deck is the order of the day. Awareness is the first step in the Resistance.

https://www.amazon.com/BEHIND-GREEN-MASK-U-N-Agenda/dp/0615494544/186-9353788-5800700?ie=UTF8&*Version*=1&*entries*=0
 
LOL

Of course that is all you would see. Others see global powers seeking to determine where, and how, people are allowed to live. I guess it pays to focus on the sheep first. And to think, despite the evidence, some try to hide from the facts by calling these documented plans a conspiracy. Who is in denial again?

These people have not even a clue where the term 'conspiracy theory' comes from!
It is used bt TPTSB to keep them from the truth. It is a kind of firewall for their minds
They don;t dare to pass that, for fear of ridicule and more.

But one of these days...
 
She is a very good expert on this!

 
~Go for it Rosa!

 
The Migration wave is an important part of this Agenda 21

But Now Agenda 21 is called Agenda 2030.
 
Last edited:
At no point does that text suggest mandatory relocation.

You think they are mad????

They do things so people have no resistance to it. It is called Gradualism.
 
These people have not even a clue where the term 'conspiracy theory' comes from!
It is used bt TPTSB to keep them from the truth. It is a kind of firewall for their minds
They don;t dare to pass that, for fear of ridicule and more.

But one of these days...

They refuse to be curious, understandable when to be so would result in personal and professional destruction. Why was the derogatory reference "denier" created?

They refuse to read transcripts from meetings on the subject, and have been trained to reject anyone, or anything that draws attention to the facts.

For example, Maurice Strong, Father of Global Warming and contributor/coordinator of the UN's Agenda 21, said the following at the UN Earth Summit he helped coordinate in RIO in 1992:

Opening Statement

Excerpts from Maurice Strong - Opening Statement, Rio Conference - From Transcript

This Conference must establish the foundations for effecting the transition to sustainable development This can only be done through fundamental changes in our economic life and in international economic relations, particularly as between industrialized and developing countries. Environment must be integrated into every aspect of our economic policy and decision-making as well as the culture and value systems which motivate economic behaviour.


The 27 principles of the 'Rio Declaration', building on the Stockholm Declaration, clearly represent a major step forward in establishing the basic-principles that must govern the conduct of nations and peoples towards each other and the Earth to ensure a secure and sustainable future. I recommend that you approve them in their present form and that they serve as a basis for future negotiation of an 'Earth Charter', which could be approved on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the United Nations.

Agenda 21 is the product of an extensive process of preparation at the professional level and negotiation at the political level. It establishes, for the first time, a framework for the systemic, co-operative action required to effect the transition to sustainable development. And its 115 programme areas define the concrete actions required to carry out this transition.

To become full partners in the process of saving our planet, developing countries need first and foremost substantial new support for strengthening their own scientific, technological, professional, educational and related institutional capacities. This is one of the important and urgent features of Agenda 21.

Perhaps the most important common ground we must arrive at in Rio is the understanding that we are all in this together. No place on the planet can remain' an island of affluence in a sea of misery. We're either going to save the whole world or no-one will be saved. We must from here on in all go down the same path. One country cannot stabilize its climate in isolation. No country can unilaterally preserve its biodiversity. One part of the world cannot live an orgy of unrestrained consumption while the rest destroys its. environment just to survive. Neither is immune from the effects of the other.


Like it or not, from here on in, we're in this together: rich, poor, North, South, East and West. It is an exhilarating challenge to erase the barriers that have separated us in the past, to join in the global partnership that will enable us to survive in a more secure and hospitable world.​
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom