of course the reactionary parasitic statist movement feels that way. Tell us what decisions of his causes you so much butt hurt?
He went to a community college.The highly intelligent Ivy Leaguer presents his 'criteria'^ as to why a sitting SCOTUS member should "stay on." ( that criteria being that a DP chatroom co-member "dislikes" a SCOTUS member )
I kind of get a kick out of the fact that they deny God but Satan...that's a different matter.
I deny both. Characters in a fairy tale.
I'm not as kind as you are. I don't want his type to do any more damage.
You do realize TD is a self-professed non-theist/agnostic? Yes?
Perhaps they are just being honest with themselves. I'm against the death penalty but I also would not help some person who has caused death to many others.
I know the reason-you cannot really recall any decision he authored that you can take issue with because you don't understand the sort of legal reasoning behind the decisions. You just repeat what other lefties have said.
what damage has he done to you?
It's not that hateful when you wish what's best for society.
Is it any more "disgusting" than a wealthy American advocating to willfully starve other Americans, as you are on DP record as advocating for? Willfully "starving" human beings has been deemed to be a form of torture.
your concept of what is best for society is what was used to justify things like the holocaust and the Stalinist purges. All of those who justified deaths-be it one or millions-claimed it was "best for society"
Why is it, per your posted claim here at DP, "best for society" to "starve certain Americans"? How do you personally "justify" your desire to starve "certain Americans"?
As long as he retires, he's not doing any more damage. I think both he and his wife should retire and spend time on the beaches of florida.
Thomas described his pecker to Anita Hill before Stormy Daniels described 45's pecker to the entire civilized world.
You really don't understand the damage to society caused by people like Thomas? The stoppage of Universal health care. Saying no to child care.
I think it is hilarious that welfare-socialists think unconstitutional expansions of the income redistribution bullshit is helping people and your rants about abortion shows you haven't a clue about how the law works. Even if the USSC were to overturn Roe-it means the states would decide. And that means women could still get abortions. and unlike the rights to say bear arms or practice one's faith, you can pretty much guarantee you will not need an abortion-and if you do, not one constantly
Unlike a lot of folks around here, he's also smart enough to get the irony of the comment in question.
I suppose I'm just saying: I don't owe him any reverence whatsoever.
Translation: I'll dodge answering your fair question since I got caught with my pants down, and toss out a strawman response while multi-tasking/fluffing.
Not giving him reverence is different than not wishing ill upon him. Retirement, yes, death no.
See, this is another of those cases where someone (you) asks a completely irrelevant question and then gets bent when you don't get an answer you like. It simply doesn't matter if someone is agnostic or atheist when it comes to recognizing irony.