Ok, much better: where it is opinion, it is so stated. Much, much better.
Whew! Thats an understatement! You're up to what, 800 or so by now?
The people I know tell me reform isn't possible when both parties are corrupted
As I said earlier, there are many, including me, who believe that election reform is badly needed, particularly in the areas of campaign finance. Every election cycle, we see some efforts being made to do so. The last serious effort was McCain-Feingold, which turned out to be less than effective. But 'corrupted' is a very strong word, one with which I would not agree. In need of reform, but 'corrupted', no.
In the future, one of the principal driving forces for reform will, I believe, be the Internet. It will do so thru the power of blogs, and forums (yep, even forums like this one), and the transition of mainstream media (MSM) to a much greater presence on the 'net. This will happen due to the ubiquitous nature of the 'net, combined with the ability of thousands, maybe eventually even millions, of people to check facts, disseminate facts, discuss facts and form opinions in virtually 'real' time. That is, there will little if any delay between events and the spreading of knowledge of those events. The net result will be the coming of an age of totally transparent politcs. Politicians will be accountable thru the ability of thousands to 'fact-check' and disseminate information to millions in astonishing rapidity. Yes, there will additional legislation resulting. Look around you and you can see this process beginning already -- the power of blogs is growing by leaps and bounds.
IT would break out during an election process where one side accused the other of fixing it So they say I believe for it to happen there would need to be one of the main parties inciting it
While I concede the possibility for public unreast exists in such a scenario, for this unrest to approach anything remotely resembling 'civil war' is totally beyond the pale. I am confident of the checks and balances in our system of government and their ability to deal with any such situation.
it getting mean out there and people are not willing to leave it up to the govt. look at what is happen in cal. and tex. the state is taking fed law into their own hands on the illegals issue
Which reminds me, if America is as bad as you have described it in all your many posts, it sure is strange that so many millions of people are trying to get in and become Americans! Over the years, there has always contention, in varying degrees, between states and the Feds. It will get worked out. Thats not to say that it won't get to be a bigger, more contentious problem that already exists. But, it will get worked out.
it is my opinion and it also the opinion of alot of people i know spanish speaking people of America out number english for instance it can come from them the spark all that is needed is a spark to ignite a forest fire
Well, no, hispanics now outnumber African-Americans by about 14% vs 12% of the population, IIRC. Caucasians still are about 60%, again IIRC.
Yeah I've seen them on TV those extremists and they have power add all the other splinter groups and other groups such as nazi,blackz,spanish speaking, its a hot bed
And if you saw the news from Toledo, Ohio about the unreast there, you no doubt noticed that it was largely one the nazi groups and a black group getting into a fracas. None of these groups will ever align themselves with any of the others -- part of their appeal is that of 'racial purity' and exclusivity.
All the foregoing is, of course, just my opinion -- your mileage may vary.