• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Cindy Sheehan Go Home!!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Look, this woman just losed her sons life in a war that Bush sent her son to. So I think she has every wright in the world to question the president. However, questioning and insinuating the president and the militarys actions is two completely different things. She has no wright to do that to the rest of our brave heroes. She needs to act like a mature woman not a selfish mother. Wars are not fought by men who dont have mommys. She needs to understand there are women out there who have losed more than 1 child to the acts of war.

Again whether or not we agree with the war at least show support to our military.
 
Coyotechic said:
If this woman doesn't have a right to question Bush on the lie he told about WMD, (that ultimately took her sons life) I don't think anyone does...what IS the noble cause? Bush wouldn't even address the womans question properly, when he finally did emerge to give his press conference on the meeting with Rum-Dum & Condi ....he blew her off as just another person demanding an end to the occupation of Iraq: thumbdown
Click to expand...

;) Is there anybody the Bush administration hasn't tried to smear?!


http://movies.crooksandliars.com/msnbc_ko_sheehan_vigil_hits_media_nerve_050811a.wmv
 
I agree with SKILMATIC that she has the right to have her questions answered and so do many other families who had lost their son/daughters. However, what makes her so special from other families that have also lost their son/daughter?
I think she's being shelfish expecting to get time with President Bush. Cindy Sheehan should go home b/c she's wasting her time and President Bush's time.
 
Whiz kid is truly a whiz. I understand that losing a loved one to anything really is a hard tough deal and to go to anger and strife is understandable under those pretentions. But we all need to learn that the world doenst revolve around you or me.

Instead of ranting so much negativity she should be taking up a cause like gather a support group for the moms whose sons are in Iraq or something. Or telling people how proud she is of her brave son. I know I am proud of her son. And I will gladly be a supporter of any military family.

I am sure her son is not very happy of what his mom is doing down here on good ole mother earth.
 
WOW...you people have missed the whole point. She is there because Bush LIED ABOUT OUR REASONS FOR WAR....she has gone through the grieving process, now she wants answers and for that matter so do I and a few others.....I think this woman is one of the most courageous people alive right now....she is pissed off and she isn't going to take the BS any more. She has my full respect and support...too bad there aren't more like her these days....too many whiney sniveling people who don't have the cajones to do much more than bitch........this woman is doing what the media whores should have done the minute we learned of the Downing Street Memo
 
Cindy Sheehan already met personally and in private with the President. It is her association with Michael Moore and MoveOn.org that calls her credibility into question. That association seems to be mutual since she posts on Michael Moore's website. Since she has already met with the President, all the rest is protest, media circus and simply personal which she is entitled to.

It seems the majority of her family, those who would know her best, feel she is dishonoring her son's service and memory. She is his mother and also has the right and position to do as she wishes with his name. Her families letter released to the media is hardly mentioned in reports and in most stories on Cindy, the letter is not mentioned at all. Selective reporting can adjust polls to read the way any organization, liberal or conservative, wants.

Go home Cindy. :duel :cool:
 
Coyotechic said:
WOW...you people have missed the whole point. She is there because Bush LIED ABOUT OUR REASONS FOR WAR....she has gone through the grieving process, now she wants answers and for that matter so do I and a few others.....I think this woman is one of the most courageous people alive right now....she is pissed off and she isn't going to take the BS any more. She has my full respect and support...too bad there aren't more like her these days....too many whiney sniveling people who don't have the cajones to do much more than bitch........this woman is doing what the media whores should have done the minute we learned of the Downing Street Memo
Click to expand...

No one has proved anyone in the admin. has lied, the DSM has been debunked, and this lady is being used by the left, it's time to go home Cindy.:roll:
 
gordontravels said:
Cindy Sheehan already met personally and in private with the President. It is her association with Michael Moore and MoveOn.org that calls her credibility into question. That association seems to be mutual since she posts on Michael Moore's website. Since she has already met with the President, all the rest is protest, media circus and simply personal which she is entitled to.

It seems the majority of her family, those who would know her best, feel she is dishonoring her son's service and memory. She is his mother and also has the right and position to do as she wishes with his name. Her families letter released to the media is hardly mentioned in reports and in most stories on Cindy, the letter is not mentioned at all. Selective reporting can adjust polls to read the way any organization, liberal or conservative, wants.

Go home Cindy. :duel :cool:
Click to expand...


That is so true, as I was watching CNN yesterday, this reporter goes through the whole thing, never once mentioning the letter, or the fact the president had talked with her in person a year ago. Then he turned it over to Wolf, and he says, but she did meet with the president a year ago, he said, "that is true" That's it, that's all we got, what an obvious oversight, and he has the nerve to just leave it at "yes, that is true", and this is Wolf Blitzer having to remind him:roll:
 
Deegan said:
That is so true, as I was watching CNN yesterday, this reporter goes through the whole thing, never once mentioning the letter, or the fact the president had talked with her in person a year ago. Then he turned it over to Wolf, and he says, but she did meet with the president a year ago, he said, "that is true" That's it, that's all we got, what an obvious oversight, and he has the nerve to just leave it at "yes, that is true", and this is Wolf Blitzer having to remind him:roll:
Click to expand...

And then I'm sure that Mr. Blitzer's next words were, "Thank you (whoever) and we'll be back right after these messages." I can, without even seeing the story you reference, be positive that he didn't go any further with comments about the letter or that the President had already met with her. He just left it at that. Is that fair reporting?

Someone here put up a post saying that 62% of the American people agree with Cindy Sheehan. If that's the case don't you think John Kerry should seek a special election immediately?

No, the media engineers the news which leads directly to engineered polls. This is a media event and nothing more. Hey, it's August.

Go home Cindy. :duel :cool:
 
Coyotechic said:
WOW...you people have missed the whole point. She is there because Bush LIED ABOUT OUR REASONS FOR WAR....she has gone through the grieving process, now she wants answers and for that matter so do I and a few others.....I think this woman is one of the most courageous people alive right now....she is pissed off and she isn't going to take the BS any more. She has my full respect and support...too bad there aren't more like her these days....too many whiney sniveling people who don't have the cajones to do much more than bitch........this woman is doing what the media whores should have done the minute we learned of the Downing Street Memo
Click to expand...

Left wing radical spin and talking points..........no more, no less...........come up with something new will you...........
 
Deegan said:
That is so true, as I was watching CNN yesterday, this reporter goes through the whole thing, never once mentioning the letter, or the fact the president had talked with her in person a year ago. Then he turned it over to Wolf, and he says, but she did meet with the president a year ago, he said, "that is true" That's it, that's all we got, what an obvious oversight, and he has the nerve to just leave it at "yes, that is true", and this is Wolf Blitzer having to remind him:roll:
Click to expand...

If you ever think your going to get fair and impartial news fromm CNN my friends you are barking up the wrong tree........

That network was not called the Clinton News Network for nothing............
 
Deegan said:
No one has proved anyone in the admin. has lied, the DSM has been debunked, and this lady is being used by the left, it's time to go home Cindy.:roll:
Click to expand...

That's where you're wrong, the authenticity has never been challenged...the "debunking" was in reference to the copies of said memos, rather than the originals.
But lets not regress...Where are the WMD? What is the noble cause? For that matter, where the hell is Bin Laden?
 
Navy Pride said:
If you ever think your going to get fair and impartial news fromm CNN my friends you are barking up the wrong tree........

That network was not called the Clinton News Network for nothing............
Click to expand...

Oh yes, by all means ONLY get your news from FOX...LOL :roll:

BTW Navy guy, are you currently deployed in Iraq?
 
Coyotechic said:
That's where you're wrong, the authenticity has never been challenged...the "debunking" was in reference to the copies of said memos, rather than the originals.
But lets not regress...Where are the WMD? What is the noble cause? For that matter, where the hell is Bin Laden?
Click to expand...

Thank you! But I do have to say that, since the President has bauched the war on terror and the Iraq war, he must have more pressing things to do than meet with a boo-hooing mom a second time.
 
Napoleon's Nightingale said:
Thank you! But I do have to say that, since the President has bauched the war on terror and the Iraq war, he must have more pressing things to do than meet with a boo-hooing mom a second time.
Click to expand...


Or so it would appear....what an idiot the shrub is! He could have quashed this little rebellion the first day, by simply talking with her.... but alas, we all know King Shrub doesn't mingle with the have-nots!
 
Coyotechic said:
That's where you're wrong, the authenticity has never been challenged...the "debunking" was in reference to the copies of said memos, rather than the originals.
But lets not regress...Where are the WMD? What is the noble cause? For that matter, where the hell is Bin Laden?
Click to expand...

WMD's? You mean the nuclear weapon that Al Gore warned about that could come from Saddam and we would wake up one day when it went off in New York City? You mean the chemical and biological weapons that Kerry, Daschle, Gephardt, Reid and other prominent Democrats and Republicans warned of under both President Clinton and Bush? What about President Clinton himself saying we would one day have to deal with Saddam militarily and beyond stand off operations like bombing the no fly zone?

What amazes me is that when President Clinton leaves office everything that was or wasn't done in that administration is somehow the fault or the loss of the Bush Administration. Our intelligence gathering capabilities were degraded by the Clinton Administration. That is fact. Don't you think the Clinton Administration should shoulder some of the blame? :duel :cool:
 
Gordon ....that argument is so tired and played out that it doesn't even merit a response.....perhaps we could stay in the here and now? Now being...."What is the noble cause?"
 
gordontravels said:
WMD's? You mean the nuclear weapon that Al Gore warned about that could come from Saddam and we would wake up one day when it went off in New York City? You mean the chemical and biological weapons that Kerry, Daschle, Gephardt, Reid and other prominent Democrats and Republicans warned of under both President Clinton and Bush? What about President Clinton himself saying we would one day have to deal with Saddam militarily and beyond stand off operations like bombing the no fly zone?

What amazes me is that when President Clinton leaves office everything that was or wasn't done in that administration is somehow the fault or the loss of the Bush Administration. Our intelligence gathering capabilities were degraded by the Clinton Administration. That is fact. Don't you think the Clinton Administration should shoulder some of the blame? :duel :cool:
Click to expand...

They won't believe you...Maybe they'll believe the Washington Times....

The Clinton administration talked about firm evidence linking Saddam Hussein's regime to Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda network years before President Bush made the same statements.
The issue arose again this month after the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States reported there was no "collaborative relationship" between the old Iraqi regime and bin Laden.
Democrats have cited the staff report to accuse Mr. Bush of making inaccurate statements about a linkage. Commission members, including a Democrat and two Republicans, quickly came to the administration's defense by saying there had been such contacts.
In fact, during President Clinton's eight years in office, there were at least two official pronouncements of an alarming alliance between Baghdad and al Qaeda. One came from William S. Cohen, Mr. Clinton's defense secretary. He cited an al Qaeda-Baghdad link to justify the bombing of a pharmaceutical plant in Sudan.
Mr. Bush cited the linkage, in part, to justify invading Iraq and ousting Saddam. He said he could not take the risk of Iraq's weapons falling into bin Laden's hands.
The other pronouncement is contained in a Justice Department indictment on Nov. 4, 1998, charging bin Laden with murder in the bombings of two U.S. embassies in Africa.
The indictment disclosed a close relationship between al Qaeda and Saddam's regime, which included specialists on chemical weapons and all types of bombs, including truck bombs, a favorite weapon of terrorists.
The 1998 indictment said: "Al Qaeda also forged alliances with the National Islamic Front in the Sudan and with the government of Iran and its associated terrorist group Hezbollah for the purpose of working together against their perceived common enemies in the West, particularly the United States. In addition, al Qaeda reached an understanding with the government of Iraq that al Qaeda would not work against that government and that on particular projects, specifically including weapons development, al Qaeda would work cooperatively with the government of Iraq."
Shortly after the embassy bombings, Mr. Clinton ordered air strikes on al Qaeda training camps in Afghanistan and on the Shifa pharmaceutical factory in Sudan.
To justify the Sudanese plant as a target, Clinton aides said it was involved in the production of deadly VX nerve gas. Officials further determined that bin Laden owned a stake in the operation and that its manager had traveled to Baghdad to learn bomb-making techniques from Saddam's weapons scientists.
Mr. Cohen elaborated in March in testimony before the September 11 commission.
He testified that "bin Laden had been living [at the plant], that he had, in fact, money that he had put into this military industrial corporation, that the owner of the plant had traveled to Baghdad to meet with the father of the VX program."
He said that if the plant had been allowed to produce VX that was used to kill thousands of Americans, people would have asked him, " 'You had a manager that went to Baghdad; you had Osama bin Laden, who had funded, at least the corporation, and you had traces of [VX precursor] and you did what? And you did nothing?' Is that a responsible activity on the part of the secretary of defense?"

http://www.washtimes.com/national/20040624-112921-3401r.htm
 
OK...I'll ask this question once again.....If Saddam had weapons of mass destruction, don't you think he would have used them....at any point in time, when the US forces attacked his country (whether it be BushI, Clinton or BushII), why didn't he use those alleged WMD? I mean, wouldn't that be the ideal time to use the tools of the trade, IF he possessed them?
 
Coyotechic, what does WMD's have to do with a mother grieving for her sons life? You liberals are all the same trying to go off tangeant and talk about wmd's when that has nothing to do with this topic. I mean we could be talking about something so incessant such as gay rights and you will still bring up wmd's, let it rest already. You are beating a dead horse that has been dead for like 2 presidential terms already.

No one has missed the point but you. We understand clearly that this woman is entitled to answers and she met with Bush himslef and she got them. Well she prolly didnt like what she heard so shes now buddy buddy with micheal moore and the liberal activist machine.

CNN aka Communist Nationalist News
 
We never said he actually had a WMD we said he had the intentions and capabilities to make one.

And the clintin admin said the same thing. He was missing a few components to making a nuclear fission weapon. And as far as a atom bomb he was negotiating with Iran to import Uranium. Now your right if he had one he would have used it but his WMD program was not yet finished. Now what would you rather do wait till he has constructed one or go in there while its still safe and get him out now.
 
Here are the quotes from Ms Sheehan when she met with the President.....


http://209.157.64.200/focus/f-news/1458638/posts

"I now know he's sincere about wanting freedom for the Iraqis," Cindy said after their meeting. "I know he's sorry and feels some pain for our loss. And I know he's a man of faith."

It is obvious this woman has been taken in and brianwashed by the far left.......
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom