CIA Leaker Fired, Traitor Liberal. (1 Viewer)

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. A CIA agent got canned today for leaking to reporters top secret knowledge about terror suspects being jailed in un-announced locations.
2. Like the CIA needs to tell the world where we are keeping terror suspects.
3. Terrorists are known by all reasonable people to be lower than a dog, sub humans. If you think they are normal people you are insane.
4. Who cares where they are really?
5.As long as they are locked up.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[easyt65]

This guy gets 'FIRED' huh?
Too bad he wasn't a reporter - could have gotten a PULITZER! :shock:

If it were you or I, we would be in jail right now!

 

[PeteEU]

Amazing that you know that the person fired was "Liberal" and the media does not, but hey maybe you got a crystal ball or something.

 

[aps]

Amazing that you know that the person fired was "Liberal" and the media does not, but hey maybe you got a crystal ball or something.

Well, Pete, she served under both Clinton and Bush--she must be a liberal. :roll:

I am proud of her for leaking this information. Our country should be better than what it was doing with those secret cells.

 

[chesswarsnow]

Well, Pete, she served under both Clinton and Bush--she must be a liberal. :roll:

I am proud of her for leaking this information. Our country should be better than what it was doing with those secret cells.

Sorry bout that,

1. aps, This traitor has damaged national security, this itself is traitorous.
2. And you say you are proud?
3. This statement is insane if you are a real American Patriot.
4. Why not move to a nation other than USA if this act of treason makes you feel all warm and fuzzy inside.
5. You support the betterment of those who would destroy USA.
6. I call that treason too. John F. Kerry is the poster child of this kind of treason.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[aps]

Sorry bout that,

1. aps, This traitor has damaged national security, this itself is traitorous.
2. And you say you are proud?
3. This statement is insane if you are a real American Patriot.
4. Why not move to a nation other than USA if this act of treason makes you feel all warm and fuzzy inside.
5. You support the betterment of those who would destroy USA.
6. I call that treason too. John F. Kerry is the poster child of this kind of treason.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Huh? You support torture? Is that what America is about? Call me what you want. This woman did the right thing, and I commend her. If I was fired for this reason, I would be okay with it.

 

[chesswarsnow]

Huh? You support torture? Is that what America is about? Call me what you want. This woman did the right thing, and I commend her. If I was fired for this reason, I would be okay with it.

Sorry bout that,

1. Sorry this isn't my * Do You Support Torture* thread.
2. This is my CIA agent,is a traitor of USA, and is a Liberal, thread.
3. All Agents take an oath.
4. She should be jailed.
5. She betrayed this country. Now I'm sounding like the nut job, Gore.
6. If you did the leak for sure they would lock you up. And I'd say right on, right on!

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[RecoveringPunk]

chesswarsnow is now officially on my nerves.

1. Why the **** do you feel the need to make a list as opposed to write a paragraph like an educated person?
2. How old are you?
3. 12?
4. Again, as it was asked before, how would you know the person is liberal? Did you personally give them a litmus test?
5. I fail to see how revealing where suspected terrorists are being held is sacrificing national security. It might be sacrificing American lives at the facility, but sacrificing American lives is something the Bush administration is quite comfortable doing.
6. I would say Bush sacrificed National Security more than anyone else in this country when he personally made the call that lead to more than 2,000 American deaths.
7. Real American Patriot? I assume you consider yourself a patriot? I'm sorry, you're not. You're a nationalist. I could probably even form a logical argument that you're a fascist. (Before you attack me for calling him a fascist, look up the definition in a dictionary and tell me that chesswarsnow doesn't fit into that description(excluding the socioeconimic policies.))
8. "Terrorists are known by all reasonable people to be lower than a dog, sub-humans[sic]." Agreed. As long as you're willing to admit that churches have been a major source of terrorism throughout the ages. Most specifically, the Crusades.
9. I care where they're locked up, and for how long. Especially since they're suspected terrorists, not known terrorists.

 

[chesswarsnow]

chesswarsnow is now officially on my nerves.

1. Why the **** do you feel the need to make a list as opposed to write a paragraph like an educated person?
2. How old are you?
3. 12?
4. Again, as it was asked before, how would you know the person is liberal? Did you personally give them a litmus test?
5. I fail to see how revealing where suspected terrorists are being held is sacrificing national security. It might be sacrificing American lives at the facility, but sacrificing American lives is something the Bush administration is quite comfortable doing.
6. I would say Bush sacrificed National Security more than anyone else in this country when he personally made the call that lead to more than 2,000 American deaths.
7. Real American Patriot? I assume you consider yourself a patriot? I'm sorry, you're not. You're a nationalist. I could probably even form a logical argument that you're a fascist. (Before you attack me for calling him a fascist, look up the definition in a dictionary and tell me that chesswarsnow doesn't fit into that description(excluding the socioeconimic policies.))
8. "Terrorists are known by all reasonable people to be lower than a dog, sub-humans[sic]." Agreed. As long as you're willing to admit that churches have been a major source of terrorism throughout the ages. Most specifically, the Crusades.
9. I care where they're locked up, and for how long. Especially since they're suspected terrorists, not known terrorists.

Sorry bout that,

1. Oh boy isn't that exciting.
2. A Typical Liberal Attack.
3. I wonder how where you base this attack, from the Liberal Media, by chance?
4. What part of the truth about being lower than a dog do you not understand if a human straps explosives to his body and blows himself and others to death? Even a dog wouldn't stoop that low. I was being kind.
5. Refer to my other topic: Liberals More Likely to Die Alone, I am sure this discribe's you to a T.
6. Face it bud, I know what you liberal's are and how you feel.
7. Your goal is to get this thread flushed.
8. I've had better threads flushed.
9. Bombs away!:lol:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[tecoyah]

Sorry bout that,

1. Oh boy isn't that exciting.
2. A Typical Liberal Attack.
3. I wonder how where you base this attack, from the Liberal Media, by chance?
4. What part of the truth about being lower than a dog do you not understand if a human straps explosives to his body and blows himself and others to death? Even a dog wouldn't stoop that low. I was being kind.
5. Refer to my other topic: Liberals More Likely to Die Alone, I am sure this discribe's you to a T.
6. Face it bud, I know what you liberal's are and how you feel.
7. Your goal is to get this thread flushed.
8. I've had better threads flushed.
9. Bombs away!:lol:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

While I do realize you are on a bit of a crusade to the sewer....I was somewhat hopeful that perhaps you might try to refrain from direct insults of the membership here, as it tends to lead to nothing but increased tensions in a thread. If indeed, your goal is to get these threads flushed, as you put it.....it would seem you need no ones help in accomplishing this incredible feat.

I am now asking....officially,that you try to make your points in a less flaming manner. For the benefit of this community as a whole.

 

[chesswarsnow]

While I do realize you are on a bit of a crusade to the sewer....I was somewhat hopeful that perhaps you might try to refrain from direct insults of the membership here, as it tends to lead to nothing but increased tensions in a thread. If indeed, your goal is to get these threads flushed, as you put it.....it would seem you need no ones help in accomplishing this incredible feat.

I am now asking....officially,that you try to make your points in a less flaming manner. For the benefit of this community as a whole.

Sorry bout that,

1. I'm very fair about how I hand out insults and sarcasm Thug.
2. You for one are not, seeing your a mod team member.
3. Many pile on me with hateful rude attacks, other try to dismiss my posts all together, as if I'm playing some kind of game.
4. Some come in and complain and protest my way of posting.
5. I take it all and seldom return this type of rancor.
6. But now I got the official warning from Thug that I need to watch my tone.
7. Does anyone else see how just plain liberal this kind of hypocrisy is?
8. I hate Liberal Hypocrisy, they can't take a hit, but can give it.:doh

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. Oh boy isn't that exciting.
2. A Typical Liberal Attack.
3. I wonder how where you base this attack, from the Liberal Media, by chance?
4. What part of the truth about being lower than a dog do you not understand if a human straps explosives to his body and blows himself and others to death? Even a dog wouldn't stoop that low. I was being kind.
5. Refer to my other topic: Liberals More Likely to Die Alone, I am sure this discribe's you to a T.
6. Face it bud, I know what you liberal's are and how you feel.
7. Your goal is to get this thread flushed.
8. I've had better threads flushed.
9. Bombs away!:lol:


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Sorry bout that,

1.This is the post in question. Or the one Thug jumps on.
2. I don't see that this is all that out of line folks.
3. I just state my view and move on.
4. Poor babies can't take my views huh.
5. I'm not into insults as a bases of conversation.
6. I do bark back a little when barked at thou.
7. But I'm fair with my sarcasm and attacks.
8. If other posters can not take my mild attacks they shouldn't be posting here.
9. I ofcourse get an official warning.
10. They get nothing, whats that say about DP?
11. It says, that in some circles, the mod team circle, I got their number, and am busy punching it, and they don't particularly like it.
12. And instead of warning those rude liberals, and themselves, they warn me.
13. I can take it, I'm a stone compared to most people in here.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[Arthur Fonzarelli]

...a $2,000.00 donation to the Kerry campaign (one of the most liberal of democrats) might be an indication...

:2razz:

 

[justone]

RECOVERING PUNK SAID:

chesswarsnow is now officially on my nerves.

1. Why the **** do you feel the need to make a list as opposed to write a paragraph like an educated person?
2. How old are you?
3. 12?
4. Again, as it was asked before, how would you know the person is liberal? Did you personally give them a litmus test?
5. I fail to see how revealing where suspected terrorists are being held is sacrificing national security. It might be sacrificing American lives at the facility, but sacrificing American lives is something the Bush administration is quite comfortable doing.
6. I would say Bush sacrificed National Security more than anyone else in this country when he personally made the call that lead to more than 2,000 American deaths.
7. Real American Patriot? I assume you consider yourself a patriot? I'm sorry, you're not. You're a nationalist. I could probably even form a logical argument that you're a fascist. (Before you attack me for calling him a fascist, look up the definition in a dictionary and tell me that chesswarsnow doesn't fit into that description(excluding the socioeconimic policies.))
8. "Terrorists are known by all reasonable people to be lower than a dog, sub-humans[sic]." Agreed. As long as you're willing to admit that churches have been a major source of terrorism throughout the ages. Most specifically, the Crusades.
9. I care where they're locked up, and for how long. Especially since they're suspected terrorists, not known terrorists.

chesswarsnow replied: Originally Posted by chesswarsnow
Sorry bout that,

1. Oh boy isn't that exciting.
2. A Typical Liberal Attack.
3. I wonder how where you base this attack, from the Liberal Media, by chance?
4. What part of the truth about being lower than a dog do you not understand if a human straps explosives to his body and blows himself and others to death? Even a dog wouldn't stoop that low. I was being kind.
5. Refer to my other topic: Liberals More Likely to Die Alone, I am sure this discribe's you to a T.
6. Face it bud, I know what you liberal's are and how you feel.
7. Your goal is to get this thread flushed.
8. I've had better threads flushed.
9. Bombs away!

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

THE MOD SAID:

While I do realize you chesswarsnow are on a bit of a crusade to the sewer....I was somewhat hopeful that perhaps you might try to refrain from direct insults of the membership here, as it tends to lead to nothing but increased tensions in a thread. If indeed, your goal is to get these threads flushed, as you put it.....it would seem you need no ones help in accomplishing this incredible feat.

I am now asking....officially,that you try to make your points in a less flaming manner. For the benefit of this community as a whole.

tecoah, you scare **** out of me. You think "liberal" is flaming, but fascist, nationalist, 12 years old, - is not? you think "Sorry bout that'' is flaming, but officially on my nerves is not.

You are officially on my nerves, because you show that you are LIBERAL = bias from your toes to your teeth. ***ing, flush me for the sake off this community as a liberal whole hole.

Regards,
fascist, Nazi, neocon, right wing nut, 3 years old, arrogant and ignorant and all other titles,
justone.

 

[Captain America]

Is this guy here a "Lone Ranger" or yet another one of those "Traitor Liberals?"

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- The man who revealed himself as Watergate's "Deep Throat" says in a new memoir that he saw himself as a "Lone Ranger" who could help derail a White House cover-up. <snip>
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/D/DEEP_THROAT_BOOK?SITE=FLTAM&SECTION=US

The truth shall set you free....(or get you labeled as a Liberal Traitor by the right, whichever comes first....:roll: )

 

[Deegan]

RECOVERING PUNK SAID:

chesswarsnow replied: Originally Posted by chesswarsnow
Sorry bout that,

1. Oh boy isn't that exciting.
2. A Typical Liberal Attack.
3. I wonder how where you base this attack, from the Liberal Media, by chance?
4. What part of the truth about being lower than a dog do you not understand if a human straps explosives to his body and blows himself and others to death? Even a dog wouldn't stoop that low. I was being kind.
5. Refer to my other topic: Liberals More Likely to Die Alone, I am sure this discribe's you to a T.
6. Face it bud, I know what you liberal's are and how you feel.
7. Your goal is to get this thread flushed.
8. I've had better threads flushed.
9. Bombs away!

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

THE MOD SAID:

tecoah, you scare **** out of me. You think "liberal" is flaming, but fascist, nationalist, 12 years old, - is not? you think "Sorry bout that'' is flaming, but officially on my nerves is not.

You are officially on my nerves, because you show that you are LIBERAL = bias from your toes to your teeth. ***ing, flush me for the sake off this community as a liberal whole hole.

Regards,
fascist, Nazi, neocon, right wing nut, 3 years old, arrogant and ignorant and all other titles,
justone.

You are correct, this is yet another glaring example of bias, and irresponsibility, but don't expect anything to be said or done.:roll:

 

[tecoyah]

Sorry bout that,

1. aps, This traitor has damaged national security, this itself is traitorous.
2. And you say you are proud?
3. This statement is insane if you are a real American Patriot.
4. Why not move to a nation other than USA if this act of treason makes you feel all warm and fuzzy inside.
5. You support the betterment of those who would destroy USA.
6. I call that treason too. John F. Kerry is the poster child of this kind of treason.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

This was the post in question....just to let you know.

refering to a member as a traitor is rather....uncalled for

 

[Deegan]

This was the post in question....just to let you know.

refering to a member as a traitor is rather....uncalled for

That still stinks, it's not the post you quoted, and that one is even less threatening, or deserving of a warning, sad.:roll:

 

[tecoyah]

That still stinks, it's not the post you quoted, and that one is even less threatening, or deserving of a warning, sad.:roll:

Perhaps you are correct.....and in fact it seems likely. My apologies to all involved. Until certain issues are resolved, I will refrain from further comment.

 

[justone]

You are correct, this is yet another glaring example of bias, and irresponsibility, but don't expect anything to be said or done.:roll:

I had to put myself in confrontation with tecoyah because he was extremely bias and irresponsible in my view and he was undermining liberal side.
On other hand I would think it is not too easy to be a new mod - you and I, as well, would do mistakes in the beginning. If you do, you certainly do mistakes. It is really up to him what he is going to do about it. He can keep on destroying this great and very tolerating site, or he can accept a feed back and make some auto corrections, he cannot feel the impact of his actions on others unless he receives a feed back. I hope my feedback was furious enough to make him hurt enough, so he would see the areas where he should not put his fingers. He can either contribute to destroying this site and turning everything in an exchange of liberal (if he did the same from conservative side, I would say conservative) ideas of recovering punks, or he can help building it up so even more different people would join and enjoy it. Chesswarsnow was almost to leave but decided to stay – which was good for the site. If you don’t like him you don’t have to talk to him, but he may find some soul mates – and thus expand the site, even if some other mates would laugh reading their exchange. If his way of speech brings him difficulties he may be able to correct and improve and change it and thus to be even more proud of himself. I think his way sucks and he should realize it. In my present view I myself was pretty stupid in the beginning, too – so I cannot make a big deal about Chesswarsnow or tecoyah - unless they insist.

 

[Deegan]

I had to put myself in confrontation with tecoyah because he was extremely bias and irresponsible in my view and he was undermining liberal side.
On other hand I would think it is not too easy to be a new mod - you and I, as well, would do mistakes in the beginning. If you do, you certainly do mistakes. It is really up to him what he is going to do about it. He can keep on destroying this great and very tolerating site, or he can accept a feed back and make some auto corrections, he cannot feel the impact of his actions on others unless he receives a feed back. I hope my feedback was furious enough to make him hurt enough, so he would see the areas where he should not put his fingers. He can either contribute to destroying this site and turning everything in an exchange of liberal (if he did the same from conservative side, I would say conservative) ideas of recovering punks, or he can help building it up so even more different people would join and enjoy it. Chesswarsnow was almost to leave but decided to stay – which was good for the site. If you don’t like him you don’t have to talk to him, but he may find some soul mates – and thus expand the site, even if some other mates would laugh reading their exchange. If his way of speech brings him difficulties he may be able to correct and improve and change it and thus to be even more proud of himself. I think his way sucks and he should realize it. In my present view I myself was pretty stupid in the beginning, too – so I cannot make a big deal about Chesswarsnow or tecoyah - unless they insist.

Well it looks as if you got your answer, he replied above, and I thought it was very responsible of him to do so, good job.

 

[justone]

Well it looks as if you got your answer, he replied above, and I thought it was very responsible of him to do so, good job.

we all a bad, but some of us have an ability to improve.

I did not see his answer when I was typing my post, - I agree:

it was very responsible of him to do so, good job. :congrats:

 

[tecoyah]

Sorry bout that,

1. I'm very fair about how I hand out insults and sarcasm Thug.

Its true, you are fair.....though rather ineffective. You see proper use of sarcasm requires at the minimum, some measure of functioning in the brain. In virtually every post you have made, you show this forum just how lacking you really are in this regard.
2. You for one are not, seeing your a mod team member.
Not Any More.....Little Man.
3. Many pile on me with hateful rude attacks, other try to dismiss my posts all together, as if I'm playing some kind of game.
People disregard your posts, because they are rediculous. The belief that you were playing a game was a fading hope, that perhaps there was someone behind that incredible gap in knowledge pulling the strings of the creature we know as chesswarsnow. Alas...it is clear now this is not the reality....you have my pity.
4. Some come in and complain and protest my way of posting.
Not your "Way" of posting (though it does wear thin quickly), But that you waste bandwidth by posting at all on a forum intended to foster mature debate, peopled by those hoping to learn from each other....you have nothing to offer....at all.
5. I take it all and seldom return this type of rancor.
You are incapable of doing so....and you know it. If by chance I am wrong, please prove me in error by responding to this in such a way that I cringe at the remarks.
6. But now I got the official warning from Thug that I need to watch my tone.
Warning....what warning. But the term Thug has....grown on me, and may become quite fitting in the future.
7. Does anyone else see how just plain liberal this kind of hypocrisy is?
Heh...never really thought of myself as Liberal....but if thats it....then I'm in
8. I hate Liberal Hypocrisy, they can't take a hit, but can give it.:doh
Yeah....uh....I cant take it...woe is me.
Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

You see little Chessman, the issue here is not How you post, its not even what you post really. Its a combination of the level of conversation you might be capable of, and the simple reality that most people would rather laugh at you....than read more than the first post you make. Lets take your flood theory for example. While I have no problem with people deciding to follow the Bibles.....when you start to make up facts to support somethin, you become a target. You my poor little haybail, are one big a$$ bullseye waiting to be shot at.


What the He!! do you expect.

 

[tecoyah]

tecoah, you scare **** out of me. You think "liberal" is flaming, but fascist, nationalist, 12 years old, - is not? you think "Sorry bout that'' is flaming, but officially on my nerves is not.

You are officially on my nerves, because you show that you are LIBERAL = bias from your toes to your teeth. ***ing, flush me for the sake off this community as a liberal whole hole.

Regards,
fascist, Nazi, neocon, right wing nut, 3 years old, arrogant and ignorant and all other titles,
justone.

I should scare the Sh!t outa you Boy, But not because you see me as a Liberal. You need to think about what its like if I actually WANT to be on your nerves. My flushing days are Over, as far as threads Go.


No more Gloves to fondle the ignorant....no more walking the PC blade....no more Limitations people.

 

[chesswarsnow]

You see little Chessman, the issue here is not How you post, its not even what you post really. Its a combination of the level of conversation you might be capable of, and the simple reality that most people would rather laugh at you....than read more than the first post you make. Lets take your flood theory for example. While I have no problem with people deciding to follow the Bibles.....when you start to make up facts to support somethin, you become a target. You my poor little haybail, are one big a$$ bullseye waiting to be shot at.


What the He!! do you expect.

Sorry bout that,

1. I make this place pop.
2. You on the other hand are the local Thug.
3. You are a bummer man.
4. And a liberal.
5. I can kick start a debate about real things that are important, to myself and others.
6. You bore the hell outa everyone.
7. You are rude as a way of life man.
8. I am truthful as a way of life.
9. You got nothing on me Thug.
10. You punch at the air.
11. I just type a few words and bam! Your hit.
12. You hate the fact that I am always correct.
13. I love this fact.
14. I can make one topic that everyone wants a part of.
15. You bore the hell out of everyone.:lol:
16. You want me to sink to your level.
17. I say No Thanks, Thug.
18. I win again, Thug.
19. What makes you think I make up facts about claims I make concerning my theories?
20 I do have that kind of power to make up facts I know. And I will.
21. Are you calling me a liar? You are rude.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas