• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Church or State?

reinaert

Mono no aware
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 5, 2022
Messages
14,939
Reaction score
17,718
This happened the town over from me. I'll excerpt enough to make sense, but the full read might be worth the time:

"...Goffstown’s School Board approved a policy last year allowing Gross to sue families with delinquent debt in small claims court. Around the same time that policy was approved, Rev. Jason Wells at St. Matthew’s Episcopal Church offered to cancel the debts. Instead, some families are now being sued by the district.

Wells told InDepthNH.org on Friday he spoke to Gross about the parish’s offer to make an end of year Christmas gift to the district. Parishioners wanted to pay off all outstanding student lunch debt at the end of the calendar year, then estimated to be between $3,000 and $5,000. But Gross was not interested in the offer, Wells said..."

Some background: Goffstown is fairly rural and conservative.

The pastor, in the spirit of his faith, wanted to pay the lunch debts for all families. The school district boss turned him down and sued the families instead.

Thoughts?
 
that’s messed up.

If an organization wants to cover the debt, let them.

That’s probably lunch balances and maybe fees for library books not returned or damaged by kids.
 
BirdinHand said:
that’s messed up.

If an organization wants to cover the debt, let them.

That’s probably lunch balances and maybe fees for library books not returned or damaged by kids.
Click to expand...
It seems pretty, what's the word? - mean spirited - not to let this congregation do a very, authentically Christian thing.
 
What would Jesus do?

More to the point, look at any U.S. currency bill of any denomination. It reads "This note is legal tender for all debts, public and private." That means when a debt is owed, the creditor is obligated to accept cash in payment of the debt. They cannot say "No, we want payment in Swiss francs!" Nor can they refuse payment from a third party. Any court in the country will throw out any refusal to accept cash from a third party.

This suit will go nowhere if the church pastor steps up in court and offers to pay the debts. The court will have no choice but to dismiss the suit.
 
I'm not sanguine on the law, but it might be less simple than that.
 
reinaert said:
I'm not sanguine on the law, but it might be less simple than that.
Click to expand...
Judges are not typically tolerant of nuisance lawsuits. They don't like the courts being used to make political statements.

 
Last edited:
Stealers Wheel said:
Judges are not typically tolerant of nuisance lawsuits. They don't like the courts being used to make political statements.
Click to expand...
Goffstown statute authorizes the suits. It's not my experience that Hillsborough County/Goffstown DC will overturn local statutes.
 
Stealers Wheel said:
Again, someone has offered to pay the debt. The courts will not refuse that offer.
Click to expand...
So, as to specifics, I'm not sure you're right. But, very generally it seems like mere politics to refuse the resolution of a debt just because a church wants to step in.
 
reinaert said:
So, as to specifics, I'm not sure you're right. But, very generally it seems like mere politics to refuse the resolution of a debt just because a church wants to step in.
Click to expand...
No judge is going to entertain the notion that the debt be paid by a specific party. In that case, the pastor could just show up, hand the family the cash and say "pay your debt." No judge will disallow that.
 
Stealers Wheel said:
Again, someone has offered to pay the debt. The courts will not refuse that offer.
Click to expand...

The church can step in and pay a debt - or even a legal judgment, probably - for whatever they want. But the point of what the church was trying to do was avoid the lawsuits entirely.

This man Mr. Gross apparently believes that having the church pay off the debt doesn't punish these families for their irresponsibility enough, though.
 
It sounds to me like Scott Gross is on some sort of power trip.

In the article he claims the board has to approve any 'gifts' and yet the offer was never presented to the board for their consideration. He apparently rejected the offer unilaterally.

While they can't accept gifts without a vote, they apparently can be named a plaintiff in lawsuits without a vote.

School board might soon be in the market for a new business administrator.
 
Stealers Wheel said:
No judge is going to entertain the notion that the debt be paid by a specific party. In that case, the pastor could just show up, hand the family the cash and say "pay your debt." No judge will disallow that.
Click to expand...
The perceived problem is the transference of funds from the church directly to the secular school. The pastor could do the emboldened , and it would be perfect, but its incredibly inefficient. The school cannot release a list of names of the indebted families to the Pastor or the public, before it becomes public record in a lawsuit. The pastor instead could advertise that needy families come forward, and hand them a check to cover the bill, but will they pay the bill with it?
 
When I read this comment, I got the distinct impression this man ought to be fired:
"Gross acknowledges he never brought the St. Matthew’s gift offer to the board, saying it would not have helped and the district could not accept the funding anyway." He's now the district's legal counsel? Not his job. If I were on the board, I'd at least reprimand him for not keeping the board informed.
 
He was once a town selectman who tried to lead the charge to change Goffstown from a town mtg/board of selectmen government to one with a more centralized and unelected town manager, which job tends to be farmed out to outsiders.
 
This is the front of St Matthew's, fwiw:

 
reinaert said:
He was once a town selectman who tried to lead the charge to change Goffstown from a town mtg/board of selectmen government to one with a more centralized and unelected town manager, which job tends to be farmed out to outsiders.
Click to expand...
Explains much.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…