Chris Matthews claims Hitler and US did not use WMD in WWII [W:99]

[Perotista]

Yep... he said it... in defense of Obama's soon to be unilateral war.



I do believe Hitler used gas to kill many of the millions of Jews he murdered, and I do believe we dropped a couple of nukes on Japan.

Amazing the crap Leftists will come up with to defend Mr. Hope & Change.

Technically, Matthews is right. WMD’s back during WWII didn’t include Nukes as they hadn’t been invented yet. Using gas in the gas chambers of the concentration camps was different from the use of nerve, mustard, or other types of gas on the battle or on population centers. Artillery and bombs containing these toxins back then was what the Geneva Convention was all about. Not gas chambers in a controlled and indoor environment.

The standards we apply today was not the standards back during WWII. If there was a WMD used during WWII I would say it would have to be the fire bomb. Look at Dresden and Tokyo

 

[Peter King]

Kerry and Reid, two of the dimmest of many DimLib bulbs seem to understand Hitler used WMD. They burn about a watt brighter than Matthews... which means they have 2 watts.

Today from the Senate Floor:

I am sorry, but normally you proclaim everything Kerry and Reid say (or almost everything) as dumb and untrue but when they say something that historically incorrect you suddenly proclaim them all knowledgeable regarding second world war history and the use of chemical weapons? :lamo

 

[zimmer]

I am sorry, but normally you proclaim everything Kerry and Reid say (or almost everything) as dumb and untrue but when they say something that historically incorrect you suddenly proclaim them all knowledgeable regarding second world war history and the use of chemical weapons? :lamo

Oh... they are two dim bulbs in a Socialist Ocean filled with them, but even nitwits get history right once in a while. This was their once in a while. Hitler used WMD, and so did the US... and Matthews was well... wrong.

I do enjoy watching Libs come to the defense of the indefensible... and for what? Attempting to protect Obama, another dim bulb, from his idiotic remarks that painted himself in a corner.

How about Kerry's latest... The one week ultimatum. First Obama makes Kerry look like an idiot, now Kerry returns the favor. This is Keystone Cops stuff... Dumb and Dumber... and then of all people they haul out Frau Felonious Bill Clinton who lied her ass of about Benghazi like the rest of the administration.

On matter of importance these Socialists prove themselves to be deceitful, and idiotic. Or do you think they have done a bang-up job on Benghazi and Syria?

 

[Peter King]

Oh... they are two dim bulbs in a Socialist Ocean filled with them, but even nitwits get history right once in a while. This was their once in a while. Hitler used WMD, and so did the US... and Matthews was well... wrong.

I do enjoy watching Libs come to the defense of the indefensible... and for what? Attempting to protect Obama, another dim bulb, from his idiotic remarks that painted himself in a corner.

How about Kerry's latest... The one week ultimatum. First Obama makes Kerry look like an idiot, now Kerry returns the favor. This is Keystone Cops stuff... Dumb and Dumber... and then of all people they haul out Frau Felonious Bill Clinton who lied her ass of about Benghazi like the rest of the administration.

On matter of importance these Socialists prove themselves to be deceitful, and idiotic. Or do you think they have done a bang-up job on Benghazi and Syria?

Nobody, not even Matthews deny the use of WMD's but that is not the same as chemical weapons/chemical warfare.