• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

China to act on US election (1 Viewer)

Topsez said:
Read the full story at this link... scary stuff... http://www.newsmax.com/money/?CFID=5510200&CFTOKEN=71507415

I didn't see anything about China reacting to the US election. What statement are you referring to?

As to China diversifying from the dollar, they have been hinting at this for months.

What is truly scary is that the pro-debt policies of this administration has put the United States in a position where it owes China over a 1/2 a trillion and because of the Republicans debt addiction the US economy is very vulernable to China's decision to keep feeding it.

More tragic than scary.
 
Iriemon said:
I didn't see anything about China reacting to the US election. What statement are you referring to?

As to China diversifying from the dollar, they have been hinting at this for months.

What is truly scary is that the pro-debt policies of this administration has put the United States in a position where it owes China over a 1/2 a trillion and because of the Republicans debt addiction the US economy is very vulernable to China's decision to keep feeding it.

More tragic than scary.
Here is a copy (minus links) of the money newsletter I recieved in my email. It seems to me causing the fed to be unable to adjust interest rates to avoid recession is rather outside interfearance.

Miller Tabak & Co estimates that China now has over $1 trillion in foreign exchange reserves. Apparently, some $700 billion of these are held in U.S. dollars or dollar-denominated securities. The U.S. dollar came under immediate selling pressure.
Brian Dollan, research director at Forex.com, a unit of the currency-trading firm Gain Capital of New Jersey said, "The prime beneficiaries will be the euro, yen, [sterling] pound and the Australian dollar." (Interestingly, the last two mentioned have just raised their interest rates.)
As far as America is concerned, a weak dollar is inflationary in the medium-term. A weak dollar, in itself, could therefore lead to an increase in U.S. interest rates, as we have forecast, to stem inflation just when a recession looms.
The stagflation we have warned of may be nearer at hand that even we had thought.
[Editor's Note: Warren Buffett is betting billions that the dollar will crash.]
We can understand the natural, prudent wish for China to diversify its holdings, particularly when it may wish to purchase items from countries other than the U.S. in different currencies.
However, the timing of China’s announcement, coming on the heels of the Democratic election sweep raises other, more sinister political concerns.
It is well known that Senators Charles Schumer and Lindsey Graham have demanded a vote to impose tariffs as high as 27.5% on Chinese goods to stem the massive flow of American imports from China. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson managed to "persuade the Senators to delay their vote."
In the meantime, members of Congress such as John Dingle have bashed China publicly.
Could this "whiff of Chinese grape shot" be designed to warn newly elected Democratic politicians not to make any further noises against free trade?
If so, the power of the Chinese dragon already appears to reach within the U.S.! This has been talked about for some time. But its realization will come as a severe shock to some.
The downward pressure on the dollar is a mere sideshow.
[Editor's Note: Nancy Pelosi Doesn't Want You to Read This.]
The fact that democratic, domestic policy within America could be dictated from outside, without even a hint of either diplomatic or military pressure or coercion, is food for real concern! It is a wake-up call to the old Western democracies.
History shows that people usually like their dreams. Waking up can be an experience, sometime jarring to the mind.
If some, indeed any aspects of American internal political policy are viewed by the world in general to be dictated by a mere hint from China what next? What of Western Democracy?
Will any other nations, besides Iran and North Korea think that, providing they have the tacit agreement of China, they can snub their noses at America with impunity?
What then of the Pax Americana and the stability of the world to which we are accustomed, including markets of all kinds?
We have long warned of very great risks in the present geo-political and economic world as massive changes have occurred silently over the past few years.
It is just one reason that we have recommended our readers accumulate cash, short-term quality bonds and gold.
 
Topsez said:
Here is a copy (minus links) of the money newsletter I recieved in my email. It seems to me causing the fed to be unable to adjust interest rates to avoid recession is rather outside interfearance.

...[Editor's Note: Nancy Pelosi Doesn't Want You to Read This.]
The fact that democratic, domestic policy within America could be dictated from outside, without even a hint of either diplomatic or military pressure or coercion, is food for real concern! It is a wake-up call to the old Western democracies.
History shows that people usually like their dreams. Waking up can be an experience, sometime jarring to the mind.
If some, indeed any aspects of American internal political policy are viewed by the world in general to be dictated by a mere hint from China what next? What of Western Democracy?
Will any other nations, besides Iran and North Korea think that, providing they have the tacit agreement of China, they can snub their noses at America with impunity?
What then of the Pax Americana and the stability of the world to which we are accustomed, including markets of all kinds?
We have long warned of very great risks in the present geo-political and economic world as massive changes have occurred silently over the past few years.
It is just one reason that we have recommended our readers accumulate cash, short-term quality bonds and gold.

This concern has isn't so much about Democratic policies but about China's growing leverage over the US economy because of the huge about of debt the US Govt owes China, and how it is dependent upon China to support its debt habit.

Contrary to the editor's note, it is not Nancy Pelosi that needs to read this, but the Repbulicans and every other American that supports policies that are causing the US to go another $1/2 trillion in debt every year.

The Dems are making some noises about a "pay-go" system for the federal Govt. Every American should be supporting them on this endevor towards fiscal responsibility, for the future of our country.
 
Iriemon said:
This concern has isn't so much about Democratic policies but about China's growing leverage over the US economy because of the huge about of debt the US Govt owes China, and how it is dependent upon China to support its debt habit.

Contrary to the editor's note, it is not Nancy Pelosi that needs to read this, but the Repbulicans and every other American that supports policies that are causing the US to go another $1/2 trillion in debt every year.

The Dems are making some noises about a "pay-go" system for the federal Govt. Every American should be supporting them on this endevor towards fiscal responsibility, for the future of our country.
Oddly enough I agree with pay go and agree we should be concerned about foreign debt. I think it would be preferable to mandate US Savings Bonds to finance US debt than to export the debt to other nations. Keep the money in America and the interest earning ability to the American citizen and thereby limit the influence of outside governments.

The differences in the parties is how to pay for the debt. The left wants higher taxes and the right wants entitlement spending cuts. I think the US government should establish a priority list of "first to fall" if spending exceeds revenue and, first would be NASA followed by the Department of Education which is as useless as **** on a boarhog. We spend billions of dollars on Dept. of Education to the point if you started shaking the hands of each federal receipant of DOE getting +$50,000 + retirement benifits you couldn't meet all of them in your lifetime and Americans remain dumber than most of the industrialized world. Simply do away with the freeloaders and let the states deal with education... maybe have something like an ambasator from each state at federal level to represent education similar to the Senate.

The excess waste at DOD could yeild billions of dollars in savings... in fact the entire federal government should do away with unions. A union representing a government employee is stupid. Trust the government to fairly rate the government jobs as it does the military. If that makes no sense then support a union for the military. Unions with their power in government cause positions for and extra 30 to 40% of cost of operation of a department and limit the ability to expell worthless employees.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom