Kenneth T. Cornelius
Active member
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2005
- Messages
- 255
- Reaction score
- 4
I had reasons for that. I did engage Mr. Rice for as long as I cared to, and quit when it became obvious what he was. There were at least three things that led me to my conclusion.Urethra Franklin said:Kenneth sweetheart, this is the one paragraph of your excellent post I would disagree with. Fried Rice is openly gay, and that hardly fits in with the image of the Chinese government official trying to push the party line. If you go on the China Daily News forum, you'll see many of these people and they don't argue as coherently or as rationally as our own dear Mr. Rice.
First, he mentioned that he was with a group that was about to leave South Korea and go into North Korea to build casinos. Later, he mentioned that he was writing from Vietnam. Perhaps I jumped to the conclusion from this that he was an elite cadreman, but I don't think so.
Secondly, I had advanced the thesis that but for China the Korean nation would be united, prosperous and peaceful.
As part of the ensuing discussion I mentioned that the Korean War was started by North Korea attacking the South and the American trigger forces there. This is a historical fact, but Rice responded by calling America the aggressor. That ended the discussion right there.
Thirdly, the hostility oozes out of Mr Rice's writings.
Apropos of the above, today's WP had an article about a Chinese crackdown on student internet discussion groups.