• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

China cancels Japan talks, warns on sea dispute

ludahai

Defender of the Faith
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
10,320
Reaction score
2,115
Location
Taichung, Taiwan - 2017 East Asian Games Candidate
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
link

On again - off again tensions between China and Japan are apparently on again.

The islands off the northeast coast of Taiwan, known as Senkaku in Japanese and Diaoyutai or Tiaoyutai in Chinese (depending on which Romanization system you prefer) has been administered and controlled by Japan since 1895 except for the post-WWII period to 1972 when they were administered by the United States in accordance with the Peace Treaty of San Francisco under rights granted by the United States to administer and dispose of any lands not covered by the peace treaty.

There have been several instances in the past few decades where Chinese or Taiwanese fishing vessels would be passing through the territorial waters of the islands would be stopped by Japanese authorities and their captains arrested. This, as has been reported in the news, has dominated headlines in this part of the world for the past week.

China has little legal reason for a claim of these islands, while Taiwan's claim is very strong, deriving from a Tokyo court decision in the 1930s ruling that those islands were part of Taiwan governed from the Japanese prefectural government in Taipei rather than from Tokyo or Naha (in Okinawa). As such, those islands would have been renounced along with the main island of Taiwan itself in accordance with the terms of the Peace Treaty of San Francisco.

As China has never administered or governed those islands, and as China is not party to any treaty by which it is granted sovereignty or administrative rights to those islands, it has no legal claim to them. Of course, they know this and are not eager to have the International Court of Justice (this falls within the ICJ's jurisduction) ajudicate this, nor are they willing to allow the Taiwan matter to see the halls of the court either, because they know they would lose.

There is also a significant dispute regarding EEZ in the East China Sea. China claims an absurd EEZ line that runs up nearly all the way to the southern Japanese Ryukyu Island Chain (not part of the Senkaku/Diaoyutai) island dispute while Japan claims the median line between the two baselines of the respective countries.

China is now suspending talks with Japan regarding disputes in the East China Sea as a result of the continued detention of the captain of the Chinese boat who went into what Japan regards as its sovereign waters around the Senkaku/Diaoyutai islands...

Stay tuned...
 

ric27

DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 9, 2010
Messages
7,541
Reaction score
3,195
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Underestimating Chinese goals and willpower is a fatal mistake.
 

Councilman

DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 25, 2009
Messages
4,454
Reaction score
1,655
Location
Riverside, County, CA.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
First the Chinese will never forget that:
In December of 1937, the Japanese Imperial Army marched into China's capital city of Nanking and proceeded to murder 300,000 out of 600,000 civilians and soldiers in the city.

Next as the worlds population continues to grow at a rate that puts more and more pressure on all forms of food production and the worlds oceans are already being over fished to feed the hordes of people, territorial water disputes will intensify pushing the world closer to some cataclysmic event that reduce the population or end life as we know it.

Sorry but I see this coming if something isn't done soon.
 
Top Bottom