At this point you are simply being obtuse. No you are the one that does not understand how pregnancy works. You have proven this the entire thread. No your rhetoric doesn't prove anything but you still repeat it as if it makes a difference.
Yep you did you said men can't get a women pregnant and in one sentence just countered yourself.
I am not being obtuse by distinguishing between male and female biology. You are being obtuse by claiming that men create children. Men do not create children. The biological creation of children takes place within the context of female biology. Yes, reproductive materials are provided. However, male reproductive material alone does not create a child, nor does female reproductive material create a child without male reproductive material. The fact that the reproductive material in the form of sperm comes from outside of female biology does not mean that anyone else other than a woman can create a child. Women have wombs, which is where fetuses grow. Where fetuses grow, there is a good chance a baby will develop and when birth occurs, it occurs at the very least in part due to female biology. Birth is not a male biological function, except in the trivial case of the birth of a male infant, which is not due to the infant's masculinity, but his young age.
Umm providing semen is creating children unless you think a women doesn't need anything else and can just miraculously get pregnant with 0 outside influence. You keep saying she can but have yet to prove it.
No, providing semen is not the same as creating children. Providing semen is not even the same as impregnation. I can't believe you actually just wrote that.
There is a very good reason to believe this does not always result in child support: providing semen at any time other than during sex does not account for child support, unless fraud is involved. Take for example, the
sperm donor who donated sperm a couple years back, not by sexual intercourse. Because no doctor was involved, the state of Kansas determined that they should be able to legally rip him off.
Now this gives rise to two questions: why are medical doctors required to stop an artificial social policy, and how do we know what really went on at the time of donation in this particular case? By the former, I could have a medical doctor in attendance at the time of sexual intercourse, where sperm would be physically donated, and have the doctor sign off on the donation. By the latter, I could have sexual intercourse using a condom, and throw the condom away in the trash. Then, my girlfriend and I could leave when her roommate arrives, and her roommate could remove the semen from the condom, insert it into her vagina, get pregnant and give birth nine months later.
These types of scenarios are not common, but as far as I know, they are also not illegal. But the law is not supposed to enable fraud, it is suppose to end it. Men and women are not treated equally under family law.
Only complicated to people that do not understand basic high school biology. Yep she can't have a baby without you. Again this is biology 101. Sure deposit an egg in a uterus without a man and see what happens. I bet she doesn't have a baby.
No you are saying they spontaneously generate.
Why would you deposit an egg in a uterus except as a form of surrogacy? Is this in any way even remotely related to the topic of child support or sex?
That is what you said in your post. Men have no control over getting women pregnant. I asked you to post the law that force men to do this. Since you can't because there isn't one then this claim is just as much nonsense as your others.
You asked me to post a law which says that men don't have control over women getting pregnant? That makes absolutely no sense. There is no law preventing women from getting pregnant, it is simply a biological fact that men do not have wombs.
This is where you flunk biology again. So you are back to saying babies just sponteously create themselves.
No, women create babies. You have falsely attributed this argument to me. I am saying that your question about men who help create children is loaded. Even if men did 'help create children,' then by that logic, sperm donors would also be required to pay for the women who they helped in the matter of creation of a child. Unless you give them special legal immunity because child support is an artificial social policy designed to target sexually active men who engage in intercourse with women.