No because I know how to fight. Only time I use a weapon if the guy uses a weapon.
I blame racism on Hobbits who arrogantly segregated themselves 10,000 years ago. It's their fault. Damn hobbits for all the trouble they cause.
As for Trayvon the sad part out of all this is conservatives focus on him being a supposed thug rather than a 17 year old human being who was killed by a wannabe cop.
An unarmed 17 year old human being who was killed by a wannabe cop.
Attacking a person are the actions of a thug.As for Trayvon the sad part out of all this is conservatives focus on him being a supposed thug rather than a 17 year old human being who was killed by a wannabe cop.
The same goes for you calling him unarmed.An unarmed 17 year old human being who was killed by a wannabe cop.
Difference between us is I own 3 guns
Sigma stainless steel 9mm made by S&W
Glock 20
Glock 34
I have no problems shooting someone in the face if they are defacing my property. It has nothing to do with being tough. It is how I was raised. I am college educated, I have no problem getting rough. The point is I dont target kids. Trayvon was a kid nothing more. Zimmerman didnt know how to fist fight so he lost. Then he shoots a kid. He is a ***** to me.
Yeah yeah...Trayvon was armed with his hands and feet. We've heard that nonsense over and over again. Z's lucky to have gotten away with killing an unarmed man. He would not have fared well in a Florida Penitentiary.You both are not objective about this at all, and have allowed your bias to to twist the truth for you and engage in vitriol.
Although wanting to be a cop is not a bad thing, your use of it is meant to be demeaning.
But where you fail is in the knowledge that Zimmerman wanting to be a cop was at the time no longer the true.
Had either of you bothered to inform yourself of the actual facts, you would know that.
So you are both making false statements in an attempt to vilify Zimmerman. That is called pathetic.
It is as bad, if not worse then, painting a picture of Zimmerman as violent because of his coming to the aid of a friend against a perceived violent person who was an unbeknown undercover officer.
And these vitriolic statements of yours calling him a wanna-be, is exactly why you have retaliation of the same form against Trayvon.
Attacking a person are the actions of a thug.
So stop trying to confuse the two.
The same goes for you calling him unarmed.
The fact is, he was using his body as a weapon to attack another human.
I've noticed the same thing in the South even going back over thirty years ago.
When you look at the Left Coast, in particular Los Angeles County the extremely navy blue areas like L.A.'s Westside, Beverly Hills, Pacific Palisades, Santa Monica and Malibu are kept segregated on purpose.
The libs actually raised taxes to continue segregation by spending tens of billions of dollars to build a subway so those of color wouldn't move into their neighborhoods so they could be close to their daytime jobs of being toilet cleaners, nannies, and gardners.
There goes that bias again.Yeah yeah...Trayvon was armed with his hands and feet. We've heard that nonsense over and over again. Z's lucky to have gotten away with killing an unarmed man. He would not have fared well in a Florida Penitentiary.
WHere I come from the guy with the gun is armed; the guy without a weapon is unarmed. GLad to see you rewrite the definitions to suit you.There goes that bias again.
What a shame.
Trayvon used his own body as a weapon of assault and you sit there and support it even though all the evidence shows he was in the wrong. That is how twisted you view of things are.
And is why you have to say he was unarmed to spin the truth that he was in the wrong.
Zimmerman is lucky to have gotten away with out severe injury from Trayvon.
As for his shooting of him? It was justified by Trayvon's actions in attacking him. That isn't luck, but justice.
:dohWHere I come from the guy with the gun is armed; the guy without a weapon is unarmed. GLad to see you rewrite the definitions to suit you.
Next time a Black guy shoots an unarmed white guy while robbing a convenience store, I'll be sure to remind everyone that Excon says the white guy was armed with his hands and feet :roll:
Not until this Martin case did I ever hear someone trying to spin the facts such that an unarmed man is now armed, while the guy who had the gun was an innocent victim just trying to defend himself. I got to hand it to you Righites, your sense of reality is definitely what you make it out to be.:doh
You saying he was unarmed is you trying to spin. Period.
You are trying to make it appear as though Zimmerman was in the wrong when he wasn't.
Trayvon was attacking him.
He was acting out violently and was using his body as a weapon. Period.
Stop trying to spin the truth.
Zimmerman acted justly in shooting the person who was violently assaulting him.
There you go trying to spin again.Not until this Martin case did I ever hear someone trying to spin the facts such that an unarmed man is now armed, while the guy who had the gun was an innocent victim just trying to defend himself. I got to hand it to you Righites, your sense of reality is definitely what you make it out to be.
Not until this Martin case did I ever hear someone trying to spin the facts such that an unarmed man is now armed, while the guy who had the gun was an innocent victim just trying to defend himself. I got to hand it to you Righites, your sense of reality is definitely what you make it out to be.
I see your goal is to relate wealth disparity and police brutality to the right wing. But many of the rich in California are liberals. They are what we call "limousine liberals"- exempt from getting their hands dirty in helping the poor.Cali is a great example. I always thought of it as a third world country, a Brazil within our own borders, because of the amazing amount of segregation, wealth disparity and "death squad" like, aggressive law enforcement. Not sure why it has a reputation of being Left Wing---the place is as Far Right as Pinochet's Chile.
Cali is a great example. I always thought of it as a third world country, a Brazil within our own borders, because of the amazing amount of segregation, wealth disparity and "death squad" like, aggressive law enforcement. Not sure why it has a reputation of being Left Wing---the place is as Far Right as Pinochet's Chile.
I see your goal is to relate wealth disparity and police brutality to the right wing. But many of the rich in California are liberals. They are what we call "limousine liberals"- exempt from getting their hands dirty in helping the poor.
And the police are public union people. That seems very left wing to me.
California is pretty much as liberal as it gets.
You two may be right.It's known as Liberal Fascism.
The Black Ghetto on the Southside of Chicago has been a White man created and enforced segregated community since the 1920's.
At its roots...probably.So the gang violence of today is all the white mans fault? Hahhaahahahahahahaha
At its roots...probably.
Must have been tough dealing with those white gang bangers.
You did have a choice, Baldwin Hills. Or Baldwin Hills could have been used as an example of what a hood could be.
Must have been tough dealing with those white gang bangers.
You did have a choice, Baldwin Hills. Or Baldwin Hills could have been used as an example of what a hood could be.
So after he smashes your head into the cement once and disorients you, you would let him kill you instread of pulling the gun and saving your life.
This is why the human race is in trouble.
The survival instinct has been bred out of people.
At least Zimmerman still had his.
"After he smashes your head"
My friends would say "Your Extra'd out"
Zimmerman lost a fight. I've lost fights before. We all do. It is the nature of the world but I don't believe in killing kids. Zimmerman should've rested comfortably in the fact that although he lost a fist fight, he knew he had the power to take life. Zimmerman was and is a coward.
"After he smashes your head"
My friends would say "Your Extra'd out"
Zimmerman lost a fight. I've lost fights before. We all do. It is the nature of the world but I don't believe in killing kids. Zimmerman should've rested comfortably in the fact that although he lost a fist fight, he knew he had the power to take life. Zimmerman was and is a coward.
You both are not objective about this at all, and have allowed your bias to to twist the truth for you and engage in vitriol.
Although wanting to be a cop is not a bad thing, your use of it is meant to be demeaning.
But where you fail is in the knowledge that Zimmerman wanting to be a cop was at the time no longer the true.
Had either of you bothered to inform yourself of the actual facts, you would know that.
So you are both making false statements in an attempt to vilify Zimmerman. That is called pathetic.
It is as bad, if not worse then, painting a picture of Zimmerman as violent because of his coming to the aid of a friend against a perceived violent person who was an unbeknown undercover officer.
And these vitriolic statements of yours calling him a wanna-be, is exactly why you have retaliation of the same form against Trayvon.
Attacking a person are the actions of a thug.
So stop trying to confuse the two.
The same goes for you calling him unarmed.
The fact is, he was using his body as a weapon to attack another human.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?