• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Chicago Sees Spike In Gun Violence


I'm no fan of Gun Control, but I think the problem lies with how they address (or fail to) their gun violence. Which is to say they do nothing at all when its gang violence, unless an officer gets shot then:
 
Glen Contrarian said:
So why, then, is NYC - which has equally-strict gun laws IIRC - safer than most red states in the deep south when it comes to homicide rate?
Click to expand...

If NYC is safe its for other reasons besides gun control.
 
DebateChallenge said:
Than explain Chicago.
Click to expand...

Chicago is ranked 18th in per capita gun deaths.

Is it your claim that if any city ever has a temporary spike in gun crime their laws must be a big failure?
 
vegas giants said:
Prove it beyond any doubt. That is the standard you ask of others
Click to expand...

I have proven it. Chicago has gun laws that are at least as strict as those in NYC and its infested with violent crime.
 
Geoist said:
States with the loosest gun laws have the highest rates of gun violence, so there goes your theory.
Click to expand...
Define "loosest".
 
DebateChallenge said:
I have proven it. Chicago has gun laws that are at least as strict as those in NYC and its infested with violent crime.
Click to expand...

Then you are dismissed for lack of evidence
 
DebateChallenge said:
I have proven it. Chicago has gun laws that are at least as strict as those in NYC and its infested with violent crime.
Click to expand...

But there must be some other reason nyc has low gun violence rate, right? Why does it work one way but not the other.
 
Geoist said:
Fewest gun regulations.
Click to expand...
So, just the shear volume of laws will make the difference? Amazing! Does anyone else know?
 
Bullseye said:
So, just the shear volume of laws will make the difference? Amazing! Does anyone else know?
Click to expand...

Actually, having effective regulation is what is important, but there is no effectiveness if there is no/little regulation.
 
Geoist said:
https://www.cbsnews.com/pictures/death-by-gun-top-20-states-with-highest-rates/
Click to expand...
:lamo

This silly bull**** again.

In EVERY STATE...red or blue...the rates of gun violence are skewed by their minority population centers. In EVERY city that experiences high crime and violence, the one key factor is NOT guns or gun laws...it is the individuals committing the violent murders. And in EVERY circumstance....it is minority and usually gang related violence.

Chicago is not an unsafe town...but certain parts of Chicago are. Detroit isnt an unsafe town...but certain parts of Detroit are. Las Vegas isnt an unsafe town, but certain parts of Las Vegas are unsafe. And the reason why those red states show up on a 'per capita' scale is because their OVERALL population is so small, that the death rates in minority communities skew the overall numbers. In EVERY circumstance.

I know...I know. The next step is for people to shriek that pointing out the facts regarding death rates in minority communities is racist. Because you would rather shriek "thats racist!" than acknowledge and deal with a problem.

Not guns. Not gun laws. Not black people. Not brown people. Poverty and a culture that always...ALWAYS makes excuses and ignores the problem rather than confront it. And as a result, you have 74 people shot in a week and idiot leftists shrieking about everything but saving lives and actually dealing with the problems.
 
Geoist said:
Actually, having effective regulation is what is important, but there is no effectiveness if there is no/little regulation.
Click to expand...
There is no place in this country that has little or no regulation when it comes to guns.
 
Visbek said:
:roll:

New York City has strict gun laws, and violent crime rates have fallen nearly every year since 1991.

Chicago's gun laws also aren't as tough as the right so frequently claims.

Try again.
Click to expand...

Everyone's crime rates have fallen since 1991. What specifically happened in NYC in 1991 to start their crime rate decline? Please cite the causal effect.
 
Rucker61 said:
Everyone's crime rates have fallen since 1991. What specifically happened in NYC in 1991 to start their crime rate decline? Please cite the causal effect.
Click to expand...

Because we all know we can never pass a law without first citing causal effect of evidence it will work......right?
 
Bullseye said:
There is no place in this country that has little or no regulation when it comes to guns.
Click to expand...

We have the most lax gun laws in the developed world
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…