Cheney

[jfuh]

Translation: hate eventually derails every thread you try and contribute to.

Actually it's more that every thread you rear into is then quickly derailed. But then again, that's the entire purpose for your posts in those threads, to derail.

 

[CaptainCourtesy]

Moderator's Warning:

Enough of personal attacks and derailing tactics. This therad is about Cheney, NOT DP posters. Y'all got it? Get back to the topic. And remember, though Youtube can be helpful in proving a point, please keep it to the subject matter.

 

[CurrentAffairs]

much appreciated, captain.

 

[CurrentAffairs]

much appreciated, captain.

 

[dragonslayer]

I love the way the Vice President Torques your liberals jaws and he is absolutely right...........I saw the speech and he was given a standing ovation by the troops.......

so would I, give Cheney an ovation if I had orders to do so, or receive some strange duty. Generals tell the colonels to cheer Cheney, colonels tell, the captains, captains tell the leutenants, leutenants tell the enlisted people.

why else would anyone cheer for Cheney? it had to be an order starting from Bush. The dummy ordered the troops to cheer for the madman.

 

[CurrentAffairs]

so would I, give Cheney an ovation if I had orders to do so, or receive some strange duty. Generals tell the colonels to cheer Cheney, colonels tell, the captains, captains tell the leutenants, leutenants tell the enlisted people.

why else would anyone cheer for Cheney? it had to be an order starting from Bush. The dummy ordered the troops to cheer for the madman.

Now all you have to do is provide evidence supporting this nonsense. Bet you can't.

 

[26 X World Champs]

Now all you have to do is provide evidence supporting this nonsense. Bet you can't.

Since you're asking of others how about YOU providing proof to anything you write but here's the twist....you can't use the usual partisan propaganda sites that define most of your "sources." Is it too challenging for you to use non-partisan proof?

For example how about showing proof that if Cheney were to speak in front of a non-screened, non-military audience that he would receive as warm a reception as he does when the audience is stuffed with partisan hacks or soldiers who are ordered to applaud. Can you show us that?

Or how about showing us what Cheney has been right about re Iraq? Let's see you name FIVE things that he's predicted would happen and that have occurred.

I've just kicked off CurrentAffairs, it's your ball, let's see if you know how to run an offense or will it be what I expect, three and out?

 

[CurrentAffairs]

Since you're asking of others how about YOU providing proof to anything you write but here's the twist....you can't use the usual partisan propaganda sites that define most of your "sources." Is it too challenging for you to use non-partisan proof?

For example how about showing proof that if Cheney were to speak in front of a non-screened, non-military audience that he would receive as warm a reception as he does when the audience is stuffed with partisan hacks or soldiers who are ordered to applaud. Can you show us that?

Or how about showing us what Cheney has been right about re Iraq? Let's see you name FIVE things that he's predicted would happen and that have occurred.

I've just kicked off CurrentAffairs, it's your ball, let's see if you know how to run an offense or will it be what I expect, three and out?

I believe the moderator above has asked that there not be any more trolling. I'm almost certain that means you too. My request for evidence arose from dragonslayer's post:

Generals tell the colonels to cheer Cheney, colonels tell, the captains, captains tell the leutenants, leutenants tell the enlisted people. why else would anyone cheer for Cheney? it had to be an order starting from Bush. The dummy ordered the troops to cheer for the madman.

which has nothing to do with you. But thanks anyway.

 

[26 X World Champs]

I believe the moderator above has asked that there not be any more trolling. I'm almost certain that means you too. My request for evidence arose from dragonslayer's post:

Generals tell the colonels to cheer Cheney, colonels tell, the captains, captains tell the leutenants, leutenants tell the enlisted people. why else would anyone cheer for Cheney? it had to be an order starting from Bush. The dummy ordered the troops to cheer for the madman.

which has nothing to do with you. But thanks anyway.

I didn't see where this thread is a private debate? I must have missed that one? I asked YOU specific CHENEY questions, questions that you always avoid answering and debating as you just did in your last post. You also accused me again and that is a personal attack, again, one of many you've made against me in the last 24 hours.

All I'm asking of you CurrentAffairs is to express a point of view for once! You ask a lot of others but it seems you never are willing to take a stand of your own. How come? Please tell us what you think of Cheney and his job performance and please tell us especially if you think Cheney has done even an adequate job in Iraq and do so with explanations and, God forbid, factual proof from non-propaganda websites.

I'd also love to challenge you to a public one on one debate on this subject if you're up for it. Are you? One on One, you and me and we can let the Forum decide who wins the debate....are you game? You defend Cheney and I will take the opposite side.

 

[CurrentAffairs]

IAll I'm asking of you CurrentAffairs is to express a point of view for once! You ask a lot of others but it seems you never are willing to take a stand of your own. How come?

I express my point of view plenty, Champs, just not with you. Frankly, the way you keep pressing for confrontation, baiting and inciting others and begging for my respect is laughable. You're pond scum and everyone knows it. Now run and play.

 

[26 X World Champs]

I express my point of view plenty, Champs, just not with you. Frankly, the way you keep pressing for confrontation, baiting and inciting others and begging for my respect is laughable. You're pond scum and everyone knows it. Now run and play.

So another personal insult huh? How many is that in the last 24 hours? Why am I not surprised that you're afraid to debate with me either in threads or one on one as my last post requested?

Do you think that by writing post after post that contain personal slams against me that you're scoring points within the community and with the Mods?

How about we toss aside the personal attacks and debate each other on Dick Cheney? You defend him and I'll attack him. Isn't that what Debate Politics is supposed to be about CA? Are you really that afraid to to use your debating skills against me rather than your personal attack skills?

 

[CurrentAffairs]

Do you think that by writing post after post that contain personal slams against me that you're scoring points within the community and with the Mods?

I debate with a lot of folks, champs, but never again with you. You've earned the insults - you beg for them, and I'm happy to give them. Keep baiting and I'll keep taking the bait.

 

[26 X World Champs]

I debate with a lot of folks, champs, but never again with you. You've earned the insults - you beg for them, and I'm happy to give them. Keep baiting and I'll keep taking the bait.

Again? When have you ever actually debated with me or anyone? When I read your posts they seem to ask a lot of questions of others or are personal attacks against people who disagree with you but rarely if ever do you DEBATE. When challenged to debate about Cheney you cut and run. I just read every post you've written in the last 24 hours and not one actually debated whatever the topic of the thread was, none. I bet if I went back another 24 hours or 24 days I would find that pattern continuing.

You've posted about 10 times in this thread yet not one has to do with Cheney? You've not expressed an opinion about him at all. What is your opinion of Cheney and the way he's handled Iraq?

Oh, one last thing CA? How come you never thank anyone for their posts? I couldn't help but notice that you've only thanked TWO posts, ever. Is that because you're intellectually superior to everyone here so no one is worthy of your gratitude? Do you set the bar that high? Just wondering...

Actually if one were to look at many of the NeoCon posters such as yourself there is actually a pattern of very low numbers of THANKS in posts by the right wingers, very interesting...kind of speaks to the overall feeling that I have that Conservatives, Republicans, NeoCons are not very polite or considerate....but that's just MHO....

 

[CaptainCourtesy]

Moderator's Warning:

Since my warning, this has become the Champs vs. CurrentAffairs show, with mostly personal attacks and baiting. Champs, the above post is about as off topic as things can get, and has no place here. As far as I'm concerned, this thread has been tainted beyond repair. It is now going to the Archives.