alphamale said:
First of all, do have
any clue of how
puerile you appear with your che image and avatar?
Probably even most marxist academicians would laugh at you. What are you, a brainwashed college freshman? If you are anything BUT that it's reallllllllllly sad!
Do you know how ignorant you sound?:lol: Not only are you commenting on a subject in which you know nothing of except for what your neo-nazi friends tell you, but also you are calling me brainwashed which is hilarious considering you'll buy all the **** that comes out of Bushes mouth. He could start a war for no particular reason or hand over your security to a nation that has known contact with terrorists and you'd blindly follow him. If your anything but a white trash southerner or a white suburban male it'd be reallllllly sad!!!
[/QUOTE] "Though he is seen by many as a hero, opponents of Guevara, including Cuban exiles, think of him as a killer and terrorist. They point to what they see as the less savory aspects of Guevara's life, taking the viewpoint that he was enthusiastic about executing opponents of the Cuban Revolution. Some of Guevara's writing is cited as evidence of this tendency, as quoted in an article by Álvaro Vargas Llosa. For example, in his "Message to the Tricontinental", he writes of "hatred as an element of struggle; unbending hatred for the enemy, which pushes a human being beyond his natural limitations, making him into an effective, violent, selective, and cold-blooded killing machine."[53][/QUOTE]
He was a guerilla, not a politician. He fought and killed people. THat's all there is to it. But he was never enthusiastic about doing so.
New York Sun writer Williams Myers labels Guevara a "sociopathic thug".[54] Other critics writing in the U.S. press have made similar remarks. They assert that Che Guevara was responsible for the torture and execution of hundreds of people in Cuban prisons, and the murder of many more peasants in the regions controlled or visited by his guerrilla forces.[55]
These are his critics. They focus only on the violence that he was forced to use. Critics constantly over exagerate things and morph them into bullshit. He never tortured people, and never killed with out a reason. I doubt he killed peasants because they were on his side fighting against the evil US backed Batista dictatorship.
Finally, these critics believe that Guevara was a major failure at managing the Cuban economy, as he "oversaw the near-collapse of sugar production, the failure of industrialization, and the introduction of rationing—all this in what had been one of Latin America’s four most economically successful countries since before the Batista dictatorship.
I love this. People will support the Batista dictator ship which killed even more people just because it was capitalist. I love "the near collapse" which can be said about almost everything, Reagan saw the near collapse of the economy due to his large defiect increase. BTW Cuba was actually not successful at all. It was poor and oppressed.
In the end you can take cheap blows and talk **** about Che, speculate if you will etc.. but everyone in there right mind knows that it is completely over exagerated. Nothing can tarnish the image of Che because his goals were noble and just and you neo-nazis can't seem to accept that.