• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Charlie Kirk's comments on a 10 year old girl giving birth are "questionable" at best.

Showtime586

DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2020
Messages
9,300
Reaction score
12,062
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate

It's one thing to "hypothesize" about what you would require your 10 year old child to do - especially when it fits the narrative that you are promoting and profiting from - but it's something else entirely to actually do it.
Any father that would jeopardize his daughter's well-being to follow some moronic and "extreme" anti-abortion belief cannot be considered a "good father". Period.
 
When someone talks that much they're bound to say something that disturbs you.

But let's look at this exchange from your article:

KIRK: The worst thing to do to that daughter is to then say, "Hey, we're going to go murder the being inside of you."

MAREN: They wouldn't even know — like, listen.

KIRK: They wouldn't know?
Kirk is being consistently pro-life. Maren is not just questioning whether his daughter should go through that... but suggesting that she could simply have the abortion done to her without ever even knowing. Now of the two, which is being more politically incorrect?

Trying to follow an assassin's bullet with a character assassination is just a hopeless crusade. Out of all the people of his philosophy, this was the guy who wasn't afraid to go on campus and debate. You're not walking into this debate prepared, but being dumped into it by a world event.

You don't need to debate Kirk to debate the Trump censorship that Kirk would never have even supported.
 
Trying to follow an assassin's bullet with a character assassination is just a hopeless crusade.
One would think that Kirk's supporters would be thrilled to see his views getting so much more attention now. Bit of shame that quite a lot of his views were so offensive. In the midst of attempts to martyrize him those are the bits which naturally draw reasonable scrutiny; trying to liken that to assassination is rather pathetic on your part.

Out of all the people of his philosophy, this was the guy who wasn't afraid to go on campus and debate. You're not walking into this debate prepared, but being dumped into it by a world event.
From what I've seen there was little if any debate going on in any of Kirk's shows. Taking this as an example, I don't know Kirk's personal views on sexual education but as a conservative and self-described Christian I'd guess that they largely align with conservative efforts to prevent sex education for pre-teens if not remove it from schools altogether: But it seems that as soon as he found it convenient to try to score some nonsense rhetorical 'point' that all went out the window and he's insisting that a 10 year old rape victim should be graphically informed about all the consequences of the attack in the most grotesque possible way. Is that actually a view that Kirk held (making him a bad person) or was this just a bad-faith effort to talk over his interlocuter and rush them into saying something he could say 'gotcha' on?

From the handful of interactions I've seen he didn't go on campuses to debate in any meaningful sense - let alone in good faith - he went to put on a show and was well-rehearsed to essentially bully college kids who'd naively expected a genuine conversation, whenever he felt it was opportune to do so.


KIRK: Abortion is not a victimless crime. The point is, how you were conceived is irrelevant to what human rights you get. If a person conceived in rape walks down the side of the street, it's not like they don't get First Amendment rights or Second Amendment rights.​
MAREN: It's not about that person —​
KIRK talking over her: The worst thing to do to that daughter is to then say, "Hey, we're going to go murder the being inside of you."​
MAREN: They wouldn't even know — like, listen.​
KIRK talking over her again: They wouldn't know?​
MAREN: Listen, listen, listen.​
KIRK still talking over her: But wouldn't it be a better story to say....​
 
Last edited:
When someone talks that much they're bound to say something that disturbs you.

But let's look at this exchange from your article:


Kirk is being consistently pro-life.
To the point of cruelty.
Follow-up question.
How angry would a father be with the person who raped his child?
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…