- Joined
- Dec 10, 2004
- Messages
- 6,822
- Reaction score
- 373
- Location
- Naples, FL
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Hoot said:As far as 26X's Champs....I thought he was a good debator, and usually, but not always, found myself in agreement with his positions. I admit he could be rude, dramatic and abrasive, but I don't believe this latest banning fell under the 'personal attack' category, but more so in the vein of his increduality at the stupidity of some of the 'ideas' used for rebuttal against his positions.
I'm also dismayed that one lone moderator can take it upon themself to ban anyone from these forums?! I believe this should always be put to a vote, and if possible, a private vote, in which the other mods are not aware of how eachother has voted.
I also believe at least a 2/3's vote should be needed for banning, and certainly not a simple majority. I also believe that the one who proposes the banning should not be allowed a vote.
I also believe that anyone who objects to another poster...say more then 3X's in a 3 month period, should also be banned for being a little wuss, and a spoiled rotten little complainer.
Although 26X's has stepped over the line on numerous occassions, I believe he was an intelligent poster, who always supported his views with common sense and good, to the point, links. I can point out numerous instances where mods have stepped over the line and thrown out personal insults, but I guess that's ok? I can't help feeling that there's a double standard at work in these forums that was originally not present.
Unfortunately, a 3 month banning will probably mean that he will not return, and DP will be the less for this.
This whole place is turning into a soap opera and as Mods, all of you must take personal responsibility.
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
Hoot
Champs was given ample opportunity to be a member of this community simply by debating in a non-inflammatory manner. That is all he had to do, but he couldn't manage it. Much like Skilmatic, sissy-boy and others who have found themselves banned these past months (keep in mind that Champs was not banned but suspended). The mod team has been very gracious with Champs as far as I am concerned. Yes he is a long-time member, which naturally correlates into him being a long-time "offender." What are we supposed to do after repeated warnings, messages and finally a letter stating quite clearly the consequences of continuing to participate in a disruptive way? You tell me, Hoot.
For anyone interested, here are the posts that Champs' suspension were based on - all but one posted on the same thread within a 24 hour-period:
http://www.debatepolitics.com/showpost.php?p=234764&postcount=47
http://www.debatepolitics.com/showpost.php?p=234873&postcount=51
http://www.debatepolitics.com/showpost.php?p=234878&postcount=52
http://www.debatepolitics.com/showpost.php?p=234469&postcount=36
http://www.debatepolitics.com/showpost.php?p=234487&postcount=38
http://www.debatepolitics.com/showpost.php?p=234531&postcount=40
http://www.debatepolitics.com/showpost.php?p=234426&postcount=26
http://www.debatepolitics.com/showpost.php?p=234313&postcount=16
http://www.debatepolitics.com/showpost.php?p=234357&postcount=18
http://www.debatepolitics.com/showpost.php?p=233994&postcount=35
Whether he is intelligent or not is irrelevant. It is his constant degrading of other people's intelligence and other personal remarks that earned him the 3-month suspension. He is a full-grown man and should be able to modify his own "style" to be in accordance with forum policy. You admit yourself that he stepped over the line on numerous occasions. I notice your record is clean, Hoot. Why is it that those who play by the rules have no trouble here and those who do not find their accounts in jeopardy? I don't have a lot of sympathy for those who know we have rules and then bitch every time action is taken against someone for enforcing them. Fact is, MOST of the forum's members have no problem being civil. You may not agree with a lot of what they say, or even find a lot of what they say offensive - I know I do! - but all ideas are welcome here. Telling someone they are stupid or an asshole for their ideas is not. It's quite simple.
As far as double standards for mods go, there are none. Mods may not be moderated in public, but if you think our interaction is all back-patting and universal agreement on our every move then you are sorely mistaken. Disagreements are regular and our discussions about them are candid and honest. Your portrayal of us as a clique that likes creating drama, playing favorites and generally being self-serving with our "power," quite frankly I find insulting. There is not a single member among us who feels that way about their responsibility. Do you really think vauge would stand for that?
Your suggestions for a "ban method" will be taken into account. It is, in fact, something we are currently discussing. Not because we doubt each other's discretion - not in the least - but precisely for the reason you are exemplifying here: suspicion shown by members towards our actions. Good thing about all that is we have nothing to hide.