• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Challenge. (1 Viewer)

wackestmc

wackestmc

Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2006
Messages
190
Reaction score
0
Location
Hell.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
I've got a challenge for anyone of the anti-homosexual learnings.

I challenge you to present any claims against homosexuality that are not religious or relative. (relative pertaining to diseases and whatnot since that's entirely based on sexual responsibility.)

I beleive there's absolutely no logical or unrelative claims outside of religion (which doesn't matter) to prove homosexuality to be immoral, unethical, or wrong. Prove me wrong, anyone.
 
wackestmc said:
I've got a challenge for anyone of the anti-homosexual learnings.

I challenge you to present any claims against homosexuality that are not religious or relative. (relative pertaining to diseases and whatnot since that's entirely based on sexual responsibility.)

I beleive there's absolutely no logical or unrelative claims outside of religion (which doesn't matter) to prove homosexuality to be immoral, unethical, or wrong. Prove me wrong, anyone.
Click to expand...

Well, if everyone was homosexual the human race would become extinct in about 100 years. That's not necessarily a good thing.
 
wackestmc said:
I've got a challenge for anyone of the anti-homosexual learnings.

I challenge you to present any claims against homosexuality that are not religious or relative. (relative pertaining to diseases and whatnot since that's entirely based on sexual responsibility.)

I beleive there's absolutely no logical or unrelative claims outside of religion (which doesn't matter) to prove homosexuality to be immoral, unethical, or wrong. Prove me wrong, anyone.
Click to expand...

The penis is designed for the vagina and the vagina is designed for the penis, the penis is not designed for the mouth or anus, that is a biological fact that you cannot counter claim.
 
jimmyjack said:
The penis is designed for the vagina and the vagina is designed for the penis, the penis is not designed for the mouth or anus, that is a biological fact that you cannot counter claim.
Click to expand...

But that doesn't make it wrong. Our hair was not meant to be conditioned, gelled, and fried, but we do it anyways even though it serves as no biological benifit to us.
 
jimmyjack said:
The penis is designed for the vagina and the vagina is designed for the penis, the penis is not designed for the mouth or anus, that is a biological fact that you cannot counter claim.
Click to expand...

And your fingers were not designed for computer keyboards. This is not an argument.
 
Iriemon said:
Well, if everyone was homosexual the human race would become extinct in about 100 years. That's not necessarily a good thing.
Click to expand...

If everyone was male, the human race would die out. That doesn't mean we should treat men as lesser beings. Besides, what are the odds of everyone on the planet becoming gay, when currently most estimates say that homo/bisexuality affects around only 10% of the population?
 
jimmyjack said:
The penis is designed for the vagina and the vagina is designed for the penis, the penis is not designed for the mouth or anus, that is a biological fact that you cannot counter claim.
Click to expand...

A penis can enter my mouth no problem. Whose to say it wasn't made to do that as well? I certainly have never gotten sick from swallowing :neener
 
Enola/Alone said:
If everyone was male, the human race would die out. That doesn't mean we should treat men as lesser beings. Besides, what are the odds of everyone on the planet becoming gay, when currently most estimates say that homo/bisexuality affects around only 10% of the population?
Click to expand...

You got a point there -- I'd think a policy of eliminating all women so that everyone was a male would not be a great policy either. I would personally be very much against it.

I personally don't have any problem with homosexuality and civil unions and equal rights. The original question posed was:

I challenge you to present any claims against homosexuality that are not religious or relative. (relative pertaining to diseases and whatnot since that's entirely based on sexual responsibility.)

One claim against homosexuality is that if everyone did it, the species would not reproduce. That is kind of a fact.
 
talloulou said:
A penis can enter my mouth no problem. Whose to say it wasn't made to do that as well? I certainly have never gotten sick from swallowing :neener
Click to expand...

In fact, one could make a strong argument that it is not mere coincidence that a mouths just happens to be approximately the same diameter as penises. I also believe that is it not just a coincidence that the size and shape of a tounge is roughly in proportion to the labia.

It's just too close to be mere coincidence. IMO.
 
jimmyjack said:
The penis is designed for the vagina and the vagina is designed for the penis, the penis is not designed for the mouth or anus, that is a biological fact that you cannot counter claim.
Click to expand...

The cranium wasn't designed for the anus. So what gives JimmyJack?
 
Iriemon said:
You got a point there -- I'd think a policy of eliminating all women so that everyone was a male would not be a great policy either. I would personally be very much against it.
Click to expand...

As would I, I was just making a kind of cack-handed point.

Iriemom said:
I personally don't have any problem with homosexuality and civil unions and equal rights. The original question posed was:

I challenge you to present any claims against homosexuality that are not religious or relative. (relative pertaining to diseases and whatnot since that's entirely based on sexual responsibility.)

One claim against homosexuality is that if everyone did it, the species would not reproduce. That is kind of a fact.
Click to expand...

I suppose, but how many homophobes are actually that way due to concern for population numbers, do you think?
 
independent_thinker2002 said:
The cranium wasn't designed for the anus. So what gives JimmyJack?
Click to expand...

Lol, I'm saying nothing. Although I may start a thread headed "Jimmyjack is Unnatural-FACT!"
 
Korimyr the Rat said:
And your fingers were not designed for computer keyboards. This is not an argument.
Click to expand...

But keyboards where designed for: fingers.
 
independent_thinker2002 said:
The cranium wasn't designed for the anus. So what gives JimmyJack?
Click to expand...

ROTFLMFAO!! That's bad ... but that was great.
 
talloulou said:
A penis can enter my mouth no problem. Whose to say it wasn't made to do that as well? I certainly have never gotten sick from swallowing :neener
Click to expand...

If your jaw where to shut on the brave man who puts his penis there, I’m sure he will not agree with you that it fits perfectly.
 
Enola/Alone said:
I suppose, but how many homophobes are actually that way due to concern for population numbers, do you think?
Click to expand...

I would suspect not many. I reckon many who are really obsessed on this issue are having to deal with own desires for the same sex, and deal with it by lashing about against the very thing that torments them. Otherwise, what's the big deal?
 
independent_thinker2002 said:
The cranium wasn't designed for the anus. So what gives JimmyJack?
Click to expand...


If you where born that way, I can only suggest you should consult your doctor.
 
jimmyjack said:
If you where born that way, I can only suggest you should consult your doctor.
Click to expand...

That was a brilliant comeback!!! :doh You aren't even smart enough for the basement.
 
jimmyjack said:
If your jaw where to shut on the brave man who puts his penis there, I’m sure he will not agree with you that it fits perfectly.
Click to expand...

Sir, if I may be personal, have you ever had fellatio? If not, you should. It can be a wonderful experience for both partners.
 
Iriemon said:
Sir, if I may be personal, have you ever had fellatio? If not, you should. It can be a wonderful experience for both partners.
Click to expand...

How does this advance the debate?
 
Escuseme said:
Is that a motion? Because if it is, I second it!
Click to expand...

God, don't tempt me! Seriously, that'd be a cool thread. :D
 
Iriemon said:
I would suspect not many. I reckon many who are really obsessed on this issue are having to deal with own desires for the same sex, and deal with it by lashing about against the very thing that torments them. Otherwise, what's the big deal?
Click to expand...

That's basically my stance, although I think ignorance plays a big part in it too.
 
Iriemon said:
You got a point there -- I'd think a policy of eliminating all women so that everyone was a male would not be a great policy either. I would personally be very much against it.

I personally don't have any problem with homosexuality and civil unions and equal rights. The original question posed was:

I challenge you to present any claims against homosexuality that are not religious or relative. (relative pertaining to diseases and whatnot since that's entirely based on sexual responsibility.)

One claim against homosexuality is that if everyone did it, the species would not reproduce. That is kind of a fact.
Click to expand...

Exactly. I said not relative. Not only is your claim relative, but impossible.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Back
Top Bottom