• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Censoring people on social media

trouble13 said:
As long as the agreement is clearly outlined in the TOS and both sides abide by what they each agreed to, I have no issue with anything they want to do.

For instance Twitter should just state up front that they do not tolerate conservative opinions on their platform. People can then decide if they want to be part of a community that does not allow conservative opinions. What Twitter is currently doing is dishonest and amounts to fraud in my book.
Click to expand...

Of course they tolerated Trump's "opinions" for four years, but we shouldn't let mere facts get in the way of a good victim narrative. Where they apparently drew the line was creating the preconditions for inevitable violence and using their platform to act as a loving apologist for supposed "great patriots" who violently attacked a center of government attempting to overthrow an election. You perhaps consider that an integral part of conservative values, a line which alienates all conservative opinions?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom