Monique
New member
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2007
- Messages
- 2
- Reaction score
- 0
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Honestly, I'm very much disgruntled with the fact that such worthless feeble and dependant countries like Georgia are literally advanced into NATO! What is it for? Don't our political leaders understand that the more such feeble and dependant countries like Georgia enter NATO, the weaker becomes NATO itself! These countries are an additional financial burden that gets imposed on the solvent NATO members. This includes not only subsidization of special training of their army, but also re-equipment and re-armament of it. Besides that, NATO troops become involved into local conflicts in these countries. In case of Georgia, it is a conflict with two break-away autonomies, and - thanks to Georgia's president Saakashvili - this conflict may soon boil over into a war with all that it implies. Of course, NATO membership implies that troops of Georgia get sent to various hot corners of the world, like Iraq for example. Yet, this gives more harm than benefit. When Georgian servicemen arrive in Iraq, they become negligent in their duties. They often disregard orders and behave disreputably in relation to militaries from other countries. What is even worse, when Georgian soldiers leave for home, they often sell their armaments to terrorists of al-Qaeda! Nowadays Georgia is in poverty and these people try to bring with them as much money as possible. So I recon that we don't need such "allies" like Georgia! It only creates problems, that's it. Perhaps Saakashvili hopes that NATO will set him up, but we won't. I think I will express everybody's opinion if I say that NATO does not need such members.