- Joined
- Oct 8, 2005
- Messages
- 4,809
- Reaction score
- 764
- Location
- Central Florida
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
Carly Fiorino was on Fox News Sunday just now, and refused to answer the questions asked of her. Chris Wallace, frustrated after having to ask several times, inquired as to how she would deal with entitlements if elected.
The entitlements must be reworked, reduced, social security age lowered in order to make the country fiscally healthy again.
It was irritating to watch her performance. Fiorino evaded like a politician. Isn't she supposed to be a CEO type who would do what is needed to 'fix' our terrible deficit and debt issues?
But she is a typical politician already, and not even in the Senate yet.
She said, regarding entitlements, that after elected she would try to engage us citizens in a conversation wherein the country's money problems could be brought under control. Since when does a hard-nosed corporate savvy leader have to ask permission to do the difficult things that have to be done? Is this a good CEO's attitude? It is crap, and a refusal to answer the important questions about the budget.
She did talk about cutting other things. You know, the things that draw an emotional response, like government waste. But, budget wise, that wouldn't amount to removing a chaise lounge from the sun deck of the QM2.
So, more of the same if this person is elected.
The entitlements must be reworked, reduced, social security age lowered in order to make the country fiscally healthy again.
It was irritating to watch her performance. Fiorino evaded like a politician. Isn't she supposed to be a CEO type who would do what is needed to 'fix' our terrible deficit and debt issues?
But she is a typical politician already, and not even in the Senate yet.
She said, regarding entitlements, that after elected she would try to engage us citizens in a conversation wherein the country's money problems could be brought under control. Since when does a hard-nosed corporate savvy leader have to ask permission to do the difficult things that have to be done? Is this a good CEO's attitude? It is crap, and a refusal to answer the important questions about the budget.
She did talk about cutting other things. You know, the things that draw an emotional response, like government waste. But, budget wise, that wouldn't amount to removing a chaise lounge from the sun deck of the QM2.
So, more of the same if this person is elected.