And people wonder why I hate government regulation:
View attachment 67435449
You can watch the video here:
By the way, progressive hero and economic illiterate FDR did the same thing, but even wor
Cows have to be milked EVERY DAY, regardless of the market. That milk represents labor, overhead, supplies, etc. Barring government intervention, that milk, and the associated products, is going to market from all the dairy farmers. And it will be sold at the current market price. It is all about supply and demand in a free market. No one can profit if the free market demand for milk and milk products is insufficient to meet the needs of the producers at any given time. An automobile maker can decide how many cars to produce and what kinds of cars to produce. Dairy farmers cannot do that. Milk is milk at the farm. The consumer has nothing to differentiate the milk from one farm over another.Why would dairy farms be more susceptible to this than any other industry? And if that big dairy monopoly started overcharging customers, what's to stop other players from getting back in the game?
This is incorrect. They might not be able to alter their production much from one day to the next, but they can most certainly make decisions for how much milk to produce (e.g. how many cows to have) from one year to the next. If dairy systemically becomes a less profitable industry, they can simply own fewer cows and/or get out of the business.Cows have to be milked EVERY DAY, regardless of the market. That milk represents labor, overhead, supplies, etc. Barring government intervention, that milk, and the associated products, is going to market from all the dairy farmers. And it will be sold at the current market price. It is all about supply and demand in a free market. No one can profit if the free market demand for milk and milk products is insufficient to meet the needs of the producers at any given time. An automobile maker can decide how many cars to produce and what kinds of cars to produce. Dairy farmers cannot do that. Milk is milk at the farm.
Well no, they can't, because there's nothing stopping anyone else from buying cows once it becomes a profitable business again.And once the corporation has ALL the dairy farms under its control, it can decide how much milk to produce and they can control the supply.
That sounds like an argument in favor of monopoly rather than against it.Independent farms simply cannot to do that. Further, if a single entity controls the majority of a market, they have the economics of size on their side. They will get their supplies cheaper than the independents.
Price stabilization is much better accomplished by having government buy milk at a fixed price, than having producers dump their milk.Farmers who vote know all this. That is why we have government prop up the price of dairy products, to keep greedy corporations from taking over the market and driving the dairy farmers out of business.
It's called a level playing field.
And people wonder why I hate government regulation:
View attachment 67435449
You can watch the video here:
By the way, progressive hero and economic illiterate FDR did the same thing, but even worse.
It would have to be pasteurized and packaged. And where would the homeless store it? It's a great idea, but I don't know how feasible it would be.So why not give it away to homeless people?
I don’t think many people realize just how much work goes into distributing food. I used to work for a food distributor in Seattle and it was a very dynamic business environment because you have to predict what a customer will order next week, but the customer doesn’t have to actually sign the contract until the night before, then the product has to arrive from the farm on a refrigerated trailer two days before the customer is even obligated to pay for it, then it has to sit in a refrigerated warehouse for a day or two and get ordered, then the next day be delivered and at that point you’re halfway through the shelf life of many fresh products like produce and dairy.It would have to be pasteurized and packaged. And where would the homeless store it? It's a great idea, but I don't know how feasible it would be.
In one sense maybe that’s true, except that to actually do this you need to process the milk into butter or American style cheese for long storage. This is what the US government did (and still does) for decades. All the cultural references to “government cheese” (there’s a similar cultural thing in Germany of “Christmas butter” where free butter would be distributed at the end of the year from a similar program in Germany) in the 1980s comes from the fact that the US government was buying the milk, and then the only thing they could do with it was make cheese, which was basically Kraft style American but stored in non descriptive boxes.Price stabilization is much better accomplished by having government buy milk at a fixed price, than having producers dump their milk.