You are wondering why any public official would want to protect immigrants that are committing crimes? I don't think any of them are doing that. None that I've heard of unless I misunderstand you.
Sanctuary Cities do exactly that by refusing to cooperate with ICE. Emanuel held that press conference in response to DT saying he intended to target criminals who were here illegally.
I hope trump will cut off all federal funds to sanctuary cities.
Immigrants do less crime than natives, a lot less.
Oh wait, is this thread one of those goofball Reality Free Zones?
My apologies if you know that was fiction.
The Mythical Connection Between Immigrants and Crime - WSJ
I'll get a chuckle, too, when the people that do this get arrested for destroying public records.I'll be sure to get a chuckle in at your expense when New York destroys its NYCID database. That's more than 850,000 people you'll never find.
It's fairly common for people with an agenda to start talking about legal immigrants when we talk about illegal immigrants.
A great number of illegal immigrants do come here just to work and, frankly, out current immigration policy for unskilled labor lends itself to people overstaying their visa and/or working "off the books". However, there is another side to illegal immigration that the open border crowd generally ignores. Lots and lots of people coming here illegally are doing so to escape justice in their homeland. Just as some American criminals flee the country to avoid prosecution for their crimes we've got foreign criminals coming here for the same reason. If, for example, you raped your cousin in Hermosillo and now need to get out of town you head for the border and then to a "sanctuary city" where you have less fear of being captured and repatriated.
I'll get a chuckle, too, when the people that do this get arrested for destroying public records.
Nice deflection. This thread, however, is about illegal immigration.The same way Cheney got arrested for destroying public records?
Why on Earth would anyone want to sabotage enforcing the law?
I agree, allowing illegals to stay in the country for too long creates an underclass which is massively stupid. That's why we should deport, fix the borders, and be vigilant about not letting it get out of control, for everyone's sake. The idea to just open the borders and make everyone a citizen who crosses the border, would be worse than "Massively Stupid".Perhaps because having an underclass is massively stupid.
I agree, allowing illegals to stay in the country for too long creates an underclass which is massively stupid. That's why we should deport, fix the borders, and be vigilant about not letting it get out of control, for everyone's sake. The idea to just open the borders and make everyone a citizen who crosses the border, would be worse than "Massively Stupid".
I'll be sure to get a chuckle in at your expense when New York destroys its NYCID database. That's more than 850,000 people you'll never find.
Nice deflection. This thread, however, is about illegal immigration.
No, it's about illegals and sanctuary cities. You are trying to claim it's about "underclass" because calling illegals "underclass" obfuscates that they are ILLEGALS. The fact that they are ALSO poor is irrelevant.Actually, it's a fantasy about the underclass.
They will really be laughing when NYC loses all that fed money.
I'll get a chuckle, too, when the people that do this get arrested for destroying public records.
What makes you think a city endorsing illegal immigration and then destroying a database IT ADMITS it uses to actually provide services to those on the list is going to be detrimental to anyone OTHER than that city and those on the list?I'll be sure to get a chuckle in at your expense when New York destroys its NYCID database. That's more than 850,000 people you'll never find.
Try it and we'll see you in court. The federal government doesn't have the authority to effectively federalize local law enforcement to do the ICE's job or to compel them to do so under threat of loss of funding. In the real world, it is entirely voluntary and any State or local government who makes such an agreement with the attorney general provides that assistance at their own expense. So it would be financially wiser to tell a Trump administration to pound sand than to round up millions of people and detain them indefinitely anyway.
No you won't, because the law that authorized the creation of the NYCID database contains what has come to be known as the "Tea Party Clause" - which authorizes destruction of the database in this scenario. It's a perfectly legal contingency to prevent the Feds from getting their hands on the information.
No you won't, because the law that authorized the creation of the NYCID database contains what has come to be known as the "Tea Party Clause" - which authorizes destruction of the database in this scenario. It's a perfectly legal contingency to prevent the Feds from getting their hands on the information.
Absolutely. I hope President Trump hastens California's demise by cutting off whatever funds he can in response to the States harboring of millions of illegal aliens who are destroying it.
No, it's about illegals and sanctuary cities. You are trying to claim it's about "underclass" because calling illegals "underclass" obfuscates that they are ILLEGALS. The fact that they are ALSO poor is irrelevant.
How would california respond if they lost all federal funding?
I dont think the democrats in that state could hold out for very long.
What does that have to do with sanctuary cities?What about children who were brought here and don't know any other country except this one, the one they were raised in?
What about children who were brought here and don't know any other country except this one, the one they were raised in?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?