California's proposition 16 is a violation of social justice

[dixon01767]

California's proposition 16 is a violation of social justice

Prop 16 is a violation of justice. It was "social justice" by definition.

The only remedy to racist discrimination is antiracist discrimination. The only remedy to past discrimination is present discrimination. The only remedy to present discrimination is future discrimination. Ibram Kendi

 

[Junzhuo Gu]

Prop 16 is a violation of justice. It was "social justice" by definition.

The only remedy to racist discrimination is antiracist discrimination. The only remedy to past discrimination is present discrimination. The only remedy to present discrimination is future discrimination. Ibram Kendi

stultify oneself

 

[Junzhuo Gu]

Prop 16 defeated. California manages to retain some sanity.

I am very glad to hear the news.

 

[danielpalos]

California's proposition 16 is a violation of social justice
California Proposition 16 allows the government to consider race, gender, color, race or ethnic origin in its policy-making, so as to solve the problem of diversity by repealing the constitutional provisions prohibiting such policies.
California act 16 trampled on social justice based on respect for individual's natural ability under the pretext of safeguarding the equal right to education of different races. The evil of this bill is that it despises individual nature, denies the inequality caused by personal ability, and pursues absolute equality, thus threatening social justice. Because social justice is based on the respect and protection of individual nature, which is also a source of national strength and vitality.
In the Republic, Plato summed up the definition of justice and held that: under the premise that private property rights are protected, justice is everyone's occupation in line with his nature. In Plato's eyes, respect and protection of individual nature is an important factor in the implementation of national justice.
The pursuit of absolute equality is an extremely dangerous signal. With this logic, property inequality between different races is equally unacceptable. Then the property claims made by the blacks in this riot are reasonable. Only by implementing socialism can we fundamentally solve the problem of property inequality among different races.
The relative equality based on individual nature is the reasonable equality. One of the important reasons why people praise Marxism is that they want to pursue absolute equality. From the disastrous social practice of Marxism in human history, we have already seen the serious consequences of pursuing absolute equality.
It is the highest principle for a country to operate normally to respect the individual's natural ability, to respect each person's position in the social division of labor according to his nature, and to respect the inequality caused by different individual natures. California act 16 tramples on such a principle, which is extremely dangerous. It will encourage the extremist thought of pursuing absolute equality, undermine social justice, and endanger the basic values of American democracy.
Junzhuo Gu
10-5-2020

Our supreme law of the land is already clear:

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

 

[Moi621]

When Affirmative Action needs a cause

I hope the NBA is required to place short people on teams
for diversity sake.
Better if they are short and Asian, or White or Latino.
No short Black people. They have enough tall ones.


Moi

​

 

[joko104]

Proposition 16 failed of course.

Did anyone really think white progressives Democrats would vote for anything they ranting demand IF it affects THEM?! White progressive LOVE - truly LOVE - their white privilege themselves. They just don't want OTHER white people to have it.

California's white Democrats would re-establish separate but equal and white-only businesses, housing, schools, universities and employment if they could get away with it. NO ONE, absolutely NO ONE is more racist than white progressive Democrats. But they otherwise do want those pathetic, inferior, hopeless darkies protected under laws outlawing cruelty to animals.

 

[Moi621]

Proposition 16 failed of course.

Did anyone really think white progressives Democrats would vote for anything they ranting demand IF it affects THEM?! White progressive LOVE - truly LOVE - their white privilege themselves. They just don't want OTHER white people to have it.

California's white Democrats would re-establish separate but equal and white-only businesses, housing, schools, universities and employment if they could get away with it. NO ONE, absolutely NO ONE is more racist than white progressive Democrats. But they otherwise do want those pathetic, inferior, hopeless darkies protected under laws outlawing cruelty to animals.

I wouldn't put that manure on my vegetable garden.


Affirmative action has been a failure although benefiting a few.
Black people still choose to live in Black neighborhoods.
The answer is to "main stream" which Black people refuse to do.
Latinos mainstream. Asians mainstream. Black people choose not to do so.

California has had "fair housing laws" for some 50 years.
Yet Black people choose Black neighborhoods. Such as S. W. Los Angeles.
(Where "Jackie Brown" was filmed.)

Welfare for housing should be tied to residing in an integrated, diverse neighborhood.

A.A. is a failure.
It should be illegal for gov't to pigeon hole people by race, gender, etc.




Moi

Recovered Liberal
If Any Liberal Can Truly Be Termed, "recovered"

A.A. Short People
on NBA teams!


​

 

[joko104]

White progressive Democratic Californians just confirmed that they want NO affirmative action IF it negatively affects THEM.

 

[aociswundumho]

Prop 16 defeated. California manages to retain some sanity.

That and other progressive ideas went down in flames:

Californians Rejecting Progressivism

Progressivism is so awful that even Californians are rejecting it. Here are some examples: The first is Prop 21, which would have allowed local governments to enact rent control. It went down in flames: https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_21,_Local_Rent_Control_Initiative_(2020)...

debatepolitics.com

Even liberals hate progressivism.

 

[Moi621]

That and other progressive ideas went down in flames:

Californians Rejecting Progressivism

Progressivism is so awful that even Californians are rejecting it. Here are some examples: The first is Prop 21, which would have allowed local governments to enact rent control. It went down in flames: https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_21,_Local_Rent_Control_Initiative_(2020)...

debatepolitics.com

Even liberals hate progressivism.

Consider
Progressives are more about leveling the economic playing field.
Such as the Eisenhower Tax Code

Liberals are more about social engineering.
Such as how many Black or female people must be part of this or that.



Moi

Don't ize
​

 

[aociswundumho]

Consider
Progressives are more about leveling the economic playing field.
Such as the Eisenhower Tax Code

Liberals are more about social engineering.
Such as how many Black or female people must be part of this or that.

No, progressives are about social engineering. They were the first to embrace eugenics and compulsory sterilization laws in the U.S.

 

[Rich2018]

California's proposition 16 is a violation of social justice
California Proposition 16 allows the government to consider race, gender, color, race or ethnic origin in its policy-making, so as to solve the problem of diversity by repealing the constitutional provisions prohibiting such policies....

Could you give an example of a scenario you see as emerging from this ?