Context please. Link to the law would be a good start.Can someone explain to me how making it legal for a 14-year-old to have sex with a 24-year-old protects children?
What CA law are you wanting explained? Provide a link so we are all clear on what you are wanting to discuss.Can someone explain to me how making it legal for a 14-year-old to have sex with a 24-year-old protects children?
Can someone explain to me how making it legal for a 14-year-old to have sex with a 24-year-old protects children?
Who told you this is legal and why on earth did you just accept their claim unquestioningly?
edit: Oh, saw the registration date. Nice try, Ivan.
What CA law are you wanting explained? Provide a link so we are all clear on what you are wanting to discuss.
California Governor Gavin Newsom signs bill changing sex offender law
California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a law that would give judges a say on whether to list someone as a sex offender for having oral or anal sex with a minor.abc7.com
Here you go dipshit
Didn't Obama and the Democrats allow CHILDREN up to the age of 26 years old to stay on their parents health insurance? Next they will be trying anyone under 26 years old as a minor. How truly pathetic.Can someone explain to me how making it legal for a 14-year-old to have sex with a 24-year-old protects children?
Just looking for any unrelated thread to post your talking points on? Grrrr, I'm a bear, grrrrr.Didn't Obama and the Democrats allow CHILDREN up to the age of 26 years old to stay on their parents health insurance? Next they will be trying anyone under 26 years old as a minor. How truly pathetic.
I imagine that this argument was common as the age of adulthood was raised from 14 on up throughout the centuries.Didn't Obama and the Democrats allow CHILDREN up to the age of 26 years old to stay on their parents health insurance? Next they will be trying anyone under 26 years old as a minor. How truly pathetic.
Only leftists consider chidlren to be as old as 26, because they never mature mentally. Anyone who still lives at home beyond the age of 18 has some very serious mental issues and very defective and obviously incompent parents.I imagine that this argument was common as the age of adulthood was raised from 14 on up throughout the centuries.
And there was a period in history where we could easily exchange those numbers for 18 and 14 respectfully, and that was the view of society then. Face it, the reality of history is that we've been pushing the age of majority (adulthood) back further and further.Only leftists consider chidlren to be as old as 26, because they never mature mentally. Anyone who still lives at home beyond the age of 18 has some very serious mental issues and very defective and obviously incompent parents.
Remind us the ages to drink alcohol, use tobacco, and rent a car (many states and/or companies).Didn't Obama and the Democrats allow CHILDREN up to the age of 26 years old to stay on their parents health insurance? Next they will be trying anyone under 26 years old as a minor. How truly pathetic.
Can someone explain to me how making it legal for a 14-year-old to have sex with a 24-year-old protects children?
Didn't Obama and the Democrats allow CHILDREN up to the age of 26 years old to stay on their parents health insurance? Next they will be trying anyone under 26 years old as a minor. How truly pathetic.
It doesn't make it legal, it has to do with giving a judge the same leeway as in heterosexual cases on whether the person convicted on the sex offenders list. You seem to have missed the point entirely.....Can someone explain to me how making it legal for a 14-year-old to have sex with a 24-year-old protects children?
Wrong again, you guys don't seem to have actually read what they did. You can still be convicted, but they leave it up to a judges discretion on whether to add them to the sex offenders list, which was already law in California for heterosexual cases. They just made the playing field even.It doesn't. So long as it was "consensual," a judge can be convinced that a college graduate-aged man grooming your middle school-aged son for his pleasure is not a sick crime.
You're missing the point of the law. It does not legalize or allow sex between two people with a 2.5+ year age difference. The only thing that changes is whether or not the older person goes on the RSO list. Now I will grant that by making the vaginal sex automatic RSO list like the oral and anal sex was, that would also have been making the law equal and non-discriminatory, and probably the way they should have. But in no way does it allow sex between a 24 YO and a 14 YOI think you are missing my point, Casper. I am against the law in its entirety whether applied to homosexual or heterosexual relationships. I do not think a judge should have any discretion as to whether an 24 year-old has sex with a 14 year old.
It doesn't. So long as it was "consensual," a judge can be convinced that a college graduate-aged man grooming your middle school-aged son for his pleasure is not a sick crime.
Nobody has done that. Why would you ask such a question?Can someone explain to me how making it legal for a 14-year-old to have sex with a 24-year-old protects children?
Actually in reading it, it doesn't just affect same sex couple. If a blowjob was being given between an opposite sex couple, by the previous law, the older automatically went on the RSO list. However, given the acts, it was a guaranteed RSO listing for same sex couples because they could not engage in PIV sexJust pointing out, it is not making that action legal. It is giving discretion up to the judge if the person being accused goes onto the sex registry or not for same sex couples. That already is the law for heterosexual couples. It's not automatic, nor does it make it legal. It just makes gays and straights being equal under the law.
California Governor Gavin Newsom signs bill changing sex offender law
California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a law that would give judges a say on whether to list someone as a sex offender for having oral or anal sex with a minor.abc7.com
Here you go dipshit
What about an 18 year old man and a 16 year old girl?I think you are missing my point, Casper. I am against the law in its entirety whether applied to homosexual or heterosexual relationships. I do not think a judge should have any discretion as to whether an 24 year-old has sex with a 14 year old.