• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

California Bans Use of Firearms Words as “Hate Speech” (1 Viewer)

This has to be a joke..
 
“We don’t want children to read about guns or talk about guns. The first step, therefore, is to remove firearms-related words from textbooks, classroom presentations, and state documents. This is not something new. California has done the same thing with hateful words directed at minority groups. In California, by law, we have banned the use of the ‘N’ word (and other racist terms) in official state publications and school textbooks. Now we are just following that practice and banning the ‘G’ word (i.e. ‘gun’) and similar firearms-related hate speech”.

What? Can we get an IQ test for this individual? That has got to be the dumbest thing I ever read.
 
Look at the date of the article.
 
Is this an Onion-like parody?

I feel uncomfortable with the acceptance that hate speech should be illegal. That someone would bend free expression to forbid chatting about guns and their use is rather mad.
 
Look at the date of the article.

Good catch. Sad that with California this is believable. That's probably why they did it.
 
Good catch. Sad that with California this is believable. That's probably why they did it.
That's probably even scarier... even if it is an AF joke, the notion that it is actually plausible in today's society is sobering.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom