• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

BYU Professor on Paid Leave for 9-11 Theory [title changed] (1 Viewer)

jujuman13

DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 1, 2006
Messages
4,075
Reaction score
579
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Link: http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&sid=476951

Whether one believes this theory or not is immaterial.

He has the right to believe in whatever he so desires, he also has the right to write down his beliefs, assuming he can either publish or get someone else to publish his writings, he also has that as his right.

So what gives his employer the right to place him on paid leave while it considers the reaction to that which he believes?

He is not attempting to indoctrinate his students.
 
Re: Evidently free speech is not permitted in USA!

You need to fix your link, because the current link takes you to KSL's home page, not to a specific story.
 
Re: Evidently free speech is not permitted in USA!

If you care to click on link I have provided above, it works.
Sorry about first link.
 
Re: Evidently free speech is not permitted in USA!

This has nothing to do with free speech. The university, not the government, is putting him on paid leave. his research isnt even being censored.
 
The university is concerned about the fact that his research and publications do not meet the standards for scholarly work. That's a very very bad thing for someone who was previously considered a decent scholar.

You don't think that the university is warranted in conducting a review of a position if for any reason, the work of a professor becomes so shoddy that no respected publications will accept it and the professors reputation becomes tarnished? I would be pissed if the university didn't meet its obligations to its students by doing so.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom