26 X World Champs said:
It is lame because posters such as yourself cannot defend Bush or stay on topic in this thread so instead you DIVERT the thread away from it's intended discussion.
That is what is so lame. It's Karl Rove tactics, and it so weak, so pathetic, so ridiculous that all that it does do is validate the fear that some Bushies have about the truth about their guy.
Here's a challenge for you! Try to defend the use of documents by Bush that are forged, inaccurate and out and out lies WITHOUT referring to Clinton or any other past transgression by anyone or anything that is not related to this specific topic. Give it a shot....:2wave:
I already proved that your side hasn't proved that they're forgerys you base all follow up statements on the basis that the first statement is true which it's not, read the first post again and then this one:
"Bush sleeps with donkeys," said one analyst, who spoke with Cybercast News Service on the condition of anonymity.
"Bush killed a hooker last night," said one analyst, who spoke with Cybercast News Service on the condition of anonymity.
"The constitution is an obvious forgery," said one analyst, who spoke with Cybercast News Service on the condition of anonymity.
"Danahrea listens to the village people," said one analyst, who spoke with Cybercast News Service on the condition of anonymity.
"What's the deal with airline peanuts," said one analyst, who spoke with Cybercast News Service on the condition of anonymity.
"Cucumbers taste better pickled," said one analyst, who spoke with Cybercast News Service on the condition of anonymity.
"Trajan's shlong falls out the bottom of his pants," said one analyst, who spoke with Cybercast News Service on the condition of anonymity.
Get the picture? Who are these supposed intelligence experts and why are they not disclosed in the article, could it be that they don't exist?