• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every persons position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Bush to Support National Intelligence Director

Schweddy

Benevolent Dictator
Administrator
DP Veteran
Joined
May 19, 2004
Messages
11,971
Reaction score
6,080
Location
Plano, TX
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
Source: Yahoo news

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Bush (news - web sites) on Monday will endorse the creation of a national intelligence director and broadly back other intelligence reforms recommended by the commission that investigated the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, the White House said.

But Bush would not locate the national intelligence director within the executive office of the presidency, as the commission had recommended, administration officials said. There have been bipartisan fears that putting the director in the White House could politicize the job.

Bush will also propose establishment of a national counter-terrorism center, and take temporary actions to enhance the authority of Acting CIA (news - web sites) Director John McLaughlin pending creation of the national intelligence director, administration officials said.

Bush is under political pressure in an election year to quickly respond to the commission's recommendations amid fears of another terrorist attack.
Not sure if this is a good thing or a bad thing. The President needs to know certain information that the rest of the country does not. Could this move befriend the position?

Also, not sure if this is political pressure. He has taken his time to look over the report before responding rather than giving a blanket approach. That in and of it self is a smart move. IMHO
 
Top Bottom