• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Bush signs law on security for US ports, ban on online gambling (1 Viewer)

jujuman13

DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 1, 2006
Messages
4,075
Reaction score
579
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Link

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/10/13/061013233953.g3sz9zz2.html

Unfortunately a clause that was dropped from this Bill which prohibited Criminals from being employed to work in these points of entry to the US, was deleted at the behest of certain Senators.

Thiat clause could have, had it been included, given the Bill massive strength and would have prevented criminal gangs from illegally importing anything they chose, including possibly bombs, weapons, drugs, illegal immigrants.

One wonders what the GOP is up to, seemingly being in bed with criminals, another scandal yet to emerge from the GOP?
Will they never learn?
--------------------------------------------------

Most Politicians are corrupt.

ALL Politicians are Liars.
 
You know...

Its people like you that give followers of either side a bad name.

You made a fine post, pointing out a great thing. But then you had to go make a snide, hollier than thou, and rather ignorant comment about the "corruption" of the GOP being in bed with "criminals". And suddenly it goes from being a decent post to more partisan shots.

I'm rather upset about this one. The online gambling thing was rather stupid to outlaw and I think could've been handled much better...and at the same time, I don't think that losing that provision was smart. However, I've not read the legislation so I'm not going to fully speak on that completely...you never know what yo'ure not seeing there.

Both parties have corrupt parts of it, both parties have thier fingers in shady dealings (look at Las Vegas for an example of it currently for the other side), and I honestly don't think either PARTY wants to help criminals.

But congrats, if not for the fact I actually heard of this before and was annoyed by it, the end of your post would've just kept another republican ignoring the entire thing instead of honestly being upset at thier party, simply because you've got to throw partisan jabs in that aren't even intellectually honest or fair.
 
Caine should be here any moment to point out that an informational thread was turned into partisan bickering by a rabid liberal hack.

:mrgreen:

or, probably not.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom