Lefty
Member
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2005
- Messages
- 119
- Reaction score
- 0
- Location
- Philadelphia
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
This is the kind of prescident allowing the president to do warrantless wiretappings is setting.
article here
David Golove, a New York University law professor who specializes in executive power issues, said that the signing statement means that Bush believes he can still authorize harsh interrogation tactics when he sees fit.
''The signing statement is saying 'I will only comply with this law when I want to, and if something arises in the war on terrorism where I think it's important to torture or engage in cruel, inhuman, and degrading conduct, I have the authority to do so and nothing in this law is going to stop me,' " he said. ''They don't want to come out and say it directly because it doesn't sound very nice, but it's unmistakable to anyone who has been following what's going on."
Golove and other legal specialists compared the signing statement to Bush's decision, revealed last month, to bypass a 1978 law forbidding domestic wiretapping without a warrant.
article here
Last edited: