• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Buffalo shooter embraced "replacement theory" pushed by Carlson...

Okay. Gotcha.
This will be my last reply to you. Anyone so ignorant of political ideology that they cite Archie Bunker as an authority just isnt worth another minute of my time.

Yes , Mr Bunker was famous for calling them "pinko commies"
 
It's one thing to tell the truth about white people not being a majority in the future. It's entirely another thing to think it's a problem.
 
Corrupt Democrats need to shut Carlson up, because he won't accept their Ukraine game, or any of the Woke Thought Police.

Dems are trying to seize on race issues in America to blacklist Carlson and have him shut down.

The fact that Democrats despatched their most well-known political attack dogs to do this, shows that the Dem leaders sense an opportunity pounce, in the wake of the Buffalo mass-murder.

There's a sudden and clear pattern of politically activity going on right now.
 
What is it with the ******s on the right that they freak out if their neighbor eats with chopsticks or speaks Spanish? Do they know nothing of US history? Am I losing my country because the guy running the corner store calls God “Allah”?
Yes unironically 100%. The post Civil Rights era has completely retconned the entirety of American history about this topic. Immigration was seen as a way to bolster our numbers for settling the nation, and later when the entire continent was settled was justified in eugenic terms of introducing fresh blood into the genepool. Immigration was initially only available to "whites of good character" had strict quotas even on immigration from white nations for the sole and explicit purpose of preventing anyone from using it as a demographic weapon. It wasnt until the mid 60s that this ended and it was ended with the explicit promise by all parties involved that it was only to help "refugees" and would never be used to flood our nation with foreigners. Then by the 90s this was completely dropped, Bill Clinton looked directly into a Camera and told America he was working to ease them into the transition to being an white minority country by 2050.

The fact that the same people doing this added stating what they are clearly and very often openly doing to their hyper-specific list of "conspiracy theories" you arent allowed to think doesnt change anything.
 
This thread is all about gaslighting this shooter w/ Tucker Carlson, which you have no problem with.. and you talk about convincing "low minded" individuals.:ROFLMAO:
Yes. So?
 
This thread is all about gaslighting this shooter w/ Tucker Carlson, which you have no problem with.. and you talk about convincing "low minded" individuals.:ROFLMAO:
Gaslighting?? You deny that Carlson has been repeating the "replacement" conspiracy theory over and over? Guess what - he took the racist theory that Jews were behind the 'replacement' of whites and substituted 'jews' with dems.

The original theory is a toxic stew of paranoid racism, but Tucker's version of it is absurd on its face . The only impediment to Latin Americans voting for Republicans is the hateful rhetoric coming from people like Carlson. Hispanics have been voting in increasing numbers for Repubs. in spite of the hate speech because they tend to be religious, pro-life, and are often comfortable with patriarchy. How do people fall for the greedy, malignant, Tucker Carlson's of this world?
 
Gaslighting?? You deny that Carlson has been repeating the "replacement" conspiracy theory over and over? Guess what - he took the racist theory that Jews were behind the 'replacement' of whites and substituted 'jews' with dems.

The original theory is a toxic stew of paranoid racism, but Tucker's version of it is absurd on its face . The only impediment to Latin Americans voting for Republicans is the hateful rhetoric coming from people like Carlson. Hispanics have been voting in increasing numbers for Repubs. in spite of the hate speech because they tend to be religious, pro-life, and are often comfortable with patriarchy. How do people fall for the greedy, malignant, Tucker Carlson's of this world?
You do not know where this commy asshole was radicalized. The replacement theory was also promoted on CNN.
 
Yes unironically 100%. The post Civil Rights era has completely retconned the entirety of American history about this topic. Immigration was seen as a way to bolster our numbers for settling the nation, and later when the entire continent was settled was justified in eugenic terms of introducing fresh blood into the genepool. Immigration was initially only available to "whites of good character" had strict quotas even on immigration from white nations for the sole and explicit purpose of preventing anyone from using it as a demographic weapon. It wasnt until the mid 60s that this ended and it was ended with the explicit promise by all parties involved that it was only to help "refugees" and would never be used to flood our nation with foreigners. Then by the 90s this was completely dropped, Bill Clinton looked directly into a Camera and told America he was working to ease them into the transition to being an white minority country by 2050.

The fact that the same people doing this added stating what they are clearly and very often openly doing to their hyper-specific list of "conspiracy theories" you arent allowed to think doesnt change anything.
As my shrink wife might say, your comment is "projecting." Our laws *were* being used as a demographic weapon, you said so yourself above, to keep northern Euros in, others out. When JFK came campaigning in my Italian neighborhood in Brooklyn in 1960, he said that Nixon had supported the discriminatory immigration law then in force which was biased against Italians and others. That law was changed in 1965, removing those biases. (Our refugee laws actually remained biased in favor of those fleeing communist countries/Middle East until that geographic/political bias was ended with the Refugee Act of 1980.) Hence the new, more diverse population of Immigrants since 1965. (When has our nation NOT been flooded with foreigners?) Thence the repeat of the periodic US freak-out over immigrants that Trump sensed and exploited.

That the country having a white minority in its future has been (probably accurately) predicted long before Clinton. Time magazine did a cover story on America's changing face around 1970, puttIng a, well, face on its cover of a brown-skinned woman of indeterminate ethnicity. North America became whiter after 1492, then darker after 1619, then whiter with the arrival of the scorned Irish, then browner with a tinge of yellow when Italians, Jews, Japanese and Chinese showed up.

A sad side to our wonderfully diverse country is that folks like Tucker Carlson keep putting down what makes us more special than many other nations. To use a baseball analogy, which was more interesting to watch in the 1950s (I am dating myself, but trust me), the diverse, daffy, winning Brooklyn Dodgers or the boring, matchine-like winning NY Yankees? And folks like Tucker have been spinning BS analyses for over a century. My fave was some theory that Sicilians, Irish and Jews were barely white since they came from the southern, northwestern, and eastern extremes of white Europe.
 
Replacement delusion began with the paranoid dog whistle screed of Ultra-liberal Joe Biden calling out the encroaching threat of the "Racial Jungle".
His racial paranoia has caused the deaths of untold thousands of what he calls in his racist theology this Jungle Menace

biden jungle.jpg
 
As my shrink wife might say, your comment is "projecting." Our laws *were* being used as a demographic weapon, you said so yourself above, to keep northern Euros in, others out. When JFK came campaigning in my Italian neighborhood in Brooklyn in 1960, he said that Nixon had supported the discriminatory immigration law then in force which was biased against Italians and others. That law was changed in 1965, removing those biases. (Our refugee laws actually remained biased in favor of those fleeing communist countries/Middle East until that geographic/political bias was ended with the Refugee Act of 1980.) Hence the new, more diverse population of Immigrants since 1965. (When has our nation NOT been flooded with foreigners?) Thence the repeat of the periodic US freak-out over immigrants that Trump sensed and exploited.

That the country having a white minority in its future has been (probably accurately) predicted long before Clinton. Time magazine did a cover story on America's changing face around 1970, puttIng a, well, face on its cover of a brown-skinned woman of indeterminate ethnicity. North America became whiter after 1492, then darker after 1619, then whiter with the arrival of the scorned Irish, then browner with a tinge of yellow when Italians, Jews, Japanese and Chinese showed up.

A sad side to our wonderfully diverse country is that folks like Tucker Carlson keep putting down what makes us more special than many other nations. To use a baseball analogy, which was more interesting to watch in the 1950s (I am dating myself, but trust me), the diverse, daffy, winning Brooklyn Dodgers or the boring, matchine-like winning NY Yankees? And folks like Tucker have been spinning BS analyses for over a century. My fave was some theory that Sicilians, Irish and Jews were barely white since they came from the southern, northwestern, and eastern extremes of white Europe.

Right so exactly what Im saying. This used to be an explicitly white country, our immigration laws reflected that. The idea of America as the feeding trough of the third world didnt emerge until much later. "The Great Replacement" isnt a conspiracy theory unless the people buffalo bill style wearing the skin of your heritage to tell that its akshooalee our CORE VALUE, and what makes us SPECIAL and STRONG. White demographic decline isnt a randomly occurring force of nature its the result of several explicit changes to our immigration policy, some of which you just listed for me, meanwhile any attempt to counter this through legislation or even just executives enforcing laws on the books is "white supremacy" which Dems either think needs to be crushed with violence or passively denied any representation in government or even the media.

Thats what this whole thread is about. Proponents of Immigration want to retcon their very very recent, unpopuar and dishonest (Hart Celler was passed w all parties involved promising it wouldnt effect racial demographics.) into being our most sacred unassailable value while making any criticism of it "stochastic terrorism" treated as a threat of violence.

The REAL question is why so many people who fall under the category of "privileged" dont see this worldview and the things your saying as a threat.
 
Replacement delusion began with the paranoid dog whistle screed of Ultra-liberal Joe Biden calling out the encroaching threat of the "Racial Jungle".
His racial paranoia has caused the deaths of untold thousands of what he calls in his racist theology this Jungle Menace

View attachment 67391324
What did he mean by that, what was the context? He indeed has a varied record on civil rights. But George Wallace changed and expressed regrets, Jessie Jackson apologized, Trump never does. That's the difference.
 
Right so exactly what Im saying. This used to be an explicitly white country, our immigration laws reflected that. The idea of America as the feeding trough of the third world didnt emerge until much later. "The Great Replacement" isnt a conspiracy theory unless the people buffalo bill style wearing the skin of your heritage to tell that its akshooalee our CORE VALUE, and what makes us SPECIAL and STRONG. White demographic decline isnt a randomly occurring force of nature its the result of several explicit changes to our immigration policy, some of which you just listed for me, meanwhile any attempt to counter this through legislation or even just executives enforcing laws on the books is "white supremacy" which Dems either think needs to be crushed with violence or passively denied any representation in government or even the media.

Thats what this whole thread is about. Proponents of Immigration want to retcon their very very recent, unpopuar and dishonest (Hart Celler was passed w all parties involved promising it wouldnt effect racial demographics.) into being our most sacred unassailable value while making any criticism of it "stochastic terrorism" treated as a threat of violence.

The REAL question is why so many people who fall under the category of "privileged" dont see this worldview and the things your saying as a threat.
The US was never a white country and we never had immigration laws to reflect that.
 
The US was never a white country and we never had immigration laws to reflect that.

The very first immigration law only applied to "whites of good character." Quotas which reflected the heavy bias were not stopped until 1965 all with promises that America would be a white nation forever and this would never change.
 
Right so exactly what Im saying. This used to be an explicitly white country, our immigration laws reflected that. The idea of America as the feeding trough of the third world didnt emerge until much later. "The Great Replacement" isnt a conspiracy theory unless the people buffalo bill style wearing the skin of your heritage to tell that its akshooalee our CORE VALUE, and what makes us SPECIAL and STRONG. White demographic decline isnt a randomly occurring force of nature its the result of several explicit changes to our immigration policy, some of which you just listed for me, meanwhile any attempt to counter this through legislation or even just executives enforcing laws on the books is "white supremacy" which Dems either think needs to be crushed with violence or passively denied any representation in government or even the media.

Thats what this whole thread is about. Proponents of Immigration want to retcon their very very recent, unpopuar and dishonest (Hart Celler was passed w all parties involved promising it wouldnt effect racial demographics.) into being our most sacred unassailable value while making any criticism of it "stochastic terrorism" treated as a threat of violence.

The REAL question is why so many people who fall under the category of "privileged" dont see this worldview and the things your saying as a threat.
Thing I don't understand is why any need at all "to counter this"? And Holy Emma Lazarus, Batman! -- a "feeding trough of the third world"? Wretched refuse indeed!

I've quoted this before, but an African in London responded to a challenge about immigration from a Brit with "we're here because you were there." We have lots of Vietnamese here because we were there. Why do you think one gets great Indonesian food in Amsterdam, great Indian food in London, great Ethiopian food in Rome? Mexicans are here for a variety of reasons, but one of them is we took over half of their territory. Actions have consequences.
 
Thing I don't understand is why any need at all "to counter this"? And Holy Emma Lazarus, Batman! -- a "feeding trough of the third world"? Wretched refuse indeed!

I've quoted this before, but an African in London responded to a challenge about immigration from a Brit with "we're here because you were there." We have lots of Vietnamese here because we were there. Why do you think one gets great Indonesian food in Amsterdam, great Indian food in London, great Ethiopian food in Rome? Mexicans are here for a variety of reasons, but one of them is we took over half of their territory. Actions have consequences.
"Wretched refuse" means nothing to me because I know the history of the statue of liberty, the political views of the guy who wrote that poem, why it was added to the statue and what Americas immigration policies were at the time.

Also one post ago immigration was OUR STRENGTH, now its OUR PUNISHMENT for colonialism.
 

The very first immigration law only applied to "whites of good character." Quotas which reflected the heavy bias were not stopped until 1965 all with promises that America would be a white nation forever and this would never change.
That was citizenship. Not immigration. Put your sheet back on.
A 1790 law was the first to specify who could become a citizen, limiting that privilege to free whites of “good moral character” who had lived in the U.S. for at least two years. In 1870, the right of citizenship was extended to those of African origin.
 
You do not know where this commy asshole was radicalized. The replacement theory was also promoted on CNN.
And You avoided the question - did or did not Tucker Carlson promote the replacement theory hundreds of times?

Show me where /when this lie is promoted on CNN. The following is what you will find on CNN:


 
"Wretched refuse" means nothing to me because I know the history of the statue of liberty, the political views of the guy who wrote that poem, why it was added to the statue and what Americas immigration policies were at the time.

Also one post ago immigration was OUR STRENGTH, now its OUR PUNISHMENT for colonialism.
It’s our strength, not a punishment - a reward, a happy result of bad policies, whether imperialism, blind anti-communism, etc.
 
Conservatives are racists. Sometimes they shoot people for being black, in fact.

It's at the point that I assume any claim a conservative makes is a lie. It usually is
What a great argument. LOL
You forgot to mention Trump and harming democracy and all the other catch phrases.
With the left everything is racists. In November people will show you they are real tried of your BS.
After the election, then you can move to a socialist country of your choice, if we are so lucky.
It's surprising with democrats controlling Washington at the federal level and the majority of the large cities, why aren't things improving. Why are cities turning to shit. Is that the left game plan?
 
And You avoided the question - did or did not Tucker Carlson promote the replacement theory hundreds of times?

Show me where /when this lie is promoted on CNN. The following is what you will find on CNN:


I don't watch Tucker Carlson to tell you how many times he's talked about it. But, CNN has also promoted it. The shooter is a self-avowed communist and you have no idea which media outlet he watches. It's not in his manifesto.

 
Back
Top Bottom