• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Budget Cuts Border Security, Immigrant Detention......

MMC

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 26, 2012
Messages
56,981
Reaction score
27,029
Location
Chicago Illinois
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Private
Marco Antonio Durazo had been awaiting deportation from an Arizona detention center for six months when an officer came to get him from his cell.
"Obama doesn't have any money," the officer said.
"We found it very funny," Durazo said, but it wasn't a joke.

a95c2ef465d35d0a2d0f6a7067006b16.jpg


Soon, he was free along with more than 2,000 other illegal immigrants who were released by the Obama administration because of budget pressures. Officials have also scaled back border agent hours, drug patrols and staffing at border crossings — all during the peak illegal border-crossing season.

Some in Congress said ICE should have explained beforehand that there wasn't enough money to keep everyone in detention.

The immigrants and their lawyers say they were released with little notice or instruction beyond being told to check in periodically.
In many cases, the immigrants were dropped off in the middle of the night at bus stations or airports in metropolitan centers without money to finish their journey home. In Florida, some were released from a facility bordering rural swamp land outside Miami.

Critics argue the plan allowed the release of thousands of criminals without regard to public safety, but officials say almost all the detainees were characterized as low risk. ICE Director John Morton told a congressional panel that 10 of the 2,228 people were the highest level of offender.

Meanwhile, the Obama administration, in the midst of trying to get immigration overhauled, switched from daily declarations that the border was secure to warning of the increasingly dire consequences of cutting $754 million from Customs and Border Protection's $12 billion budget.

According to the Government Accountability Office, the Department of Homeland Security assigned about 28,100 people in 2004 to patrol land borders and inspect travelers at all ports of entry at a cost of about $5.9 billion. By the end of 2011, those figures were 41,400 employees at a cost of $11.8 billion.

The agency is also suspending assignments known as "details" that sent agents from slower parts of the border to busier areas for months at a time. Agents on detail are often put up in hotels and receive a per diem.

The cuts have also forced the government to pull back on flight and ship patrols in the drug war in Central America.....snip~

Budget cuts border security, immigrant detention
Associated Press – 7 mins ago 3/28/2013<<<<< More here!

Seems the Cuts have taken some more of our Border Security away.....although I don't mind the pulling back from the flight and ship patrols with Central America. Should the Senators form Washington DC, that have been out to the Border several times now. Should they be running out there Flying around the Country before they go home on break? Or should they have had their azz in DC working on their Alleged Bipartisan plan? Thoughts?
 
No problem. We need to keep studying shrimp on treadmills, reasearching puppet/pottery making, having wine tasting parties, doling out aid to corrupt foreign nations and producing IRS training videos. Until our congress critters actually get busy on prioritizing federal spending and finding things that should be permanently cut, Obama will do his best to inflict "pain" for any spending that gets cut in moronic "accross the board" cuts, leaving the "details" up to Obama and his brilliant executive staff.
 
No problem. We need to keep studying shrimp on treadmills, reasearching puppet/pottery making, having wine tasting parties, doling out aid to corrupt foreign nations and producing IRS training videos. Until our congress critters actually get busy on prioritizing federal spending and finding things that should be permanently cut, Obama will do his best to inflict "pain" for any spending that gets cut in moronic "accross the board" cuts, leaving the "details" up to Obama and his brilliant executive staff.

Well said. The Dems have refused all offers to re-prioritize the reduction of increases in annual budgets, and one can only hope that even low-information voters will get the word and remember in 2014.
 
Well said. The Dems have refused all offers to re-prioritize the reduction of increases in annual budgets, and one can only hope that even low-information voters will get the word and remember in 2014.

Well they clearly see him throwing money away overseas. My thing is when Obama opens his mouth about Immigration that's where they should be asking him those questions. Hit him up with are the borders at more Risk with the cuts or not? Then watch his azz start to stutter again.
 
Well they clearly see him throwing money away overseas. My thing is when Obama opens his mouth about Immigration that's where they should be asking him those questions. Hit him up with are the borders at more Risk with the cuts or not? Then watch his azz start to stutter again.

Agreed, but I think the MSM reporters are afraid they will then be excommunicated from the Revelation Church of Obama, and then be shunned by their peers. Journalism is basically dead in this country, and I am embarrassed for the newsies when they spend their interviews humping Obama's leg.
 
Agreed, but I think the MSM reporters are afraid they will then be excommunicated from the Revelation Church of Obama, and then be shunned by their peers. Journalism is basically dead in this country, and I am embarrassed for the newsies when they spend their interviews humping Obama's leg.

Well, Obama can't get past that he said the Border was secure.....now due to sequester he talks about dire consequences of cutting border Security.
 
I don't think anyone buys the line that the border is secure, and his claims of sequester disaster are just more gas and used oats from the back end of a jackass. Obama has abandoned his nominal leadership post for a perpetual vacation punctuated by the occasional irrelevant campaign speech. I predict that his endorsement will be the kiss of death for candidates in 2014 and 2016.

The money is available to secure the border, if only the administration will use it.
 
**** all this! Take care of American veterans first.
 
Considering the "War On Illegal Immigration" is just about as effective as "The War On Drugs" I'm not sure that this matters very much.

And before anybody goes apoplectic, I'm a fan of LEGAL immigration, not ILLEGAL immigration. So rounding up 1/100th of 1% of illegals seems kind of futile.
 
Conservatives want their border patrols and their budget cuts too.

Doesn't work that way, does it?
 

That figures. The Obamabots have made a big deal about reducing security (so he can continue his vacations) and there are rumors of a forthcoming bipartisan agreement on immigration. That amounts to an "Easter Sale" public notice to the rest of the world that this is the time to sneak in.
 
Well said. The Dems have refused all offers to re-prioritize the reduction of increases in annual budgets, and one can only hope that even low-information voters will get the word and remember in 2014.

If you mean the House's "solution" which removed all defense cuts and exchanged them for more cuts in social services for the middle class and the poor, I agree.
Hopefully voters will remember what would happen if Republicans had their way.
 
If you mean the House's "solution" which removed all defense cuts and exchanged them for more cuts in social services for the middle class and the poor, I agree.
Hopefully voters will remember what would happen if Republicans had their way.

Do you really think that robotic squirrels and pottery lessons for Moroccans are "social services for the middle class and the poor" ?? :roll:
 
At this point the government is doing these things to scare people in to giving them back their unlimited credit card. They hide behind a faceless government the same way corporations hide behind "policy". It is meant to remove accountability as if the decision was organic and beyond anyone's control. This is not the case. When the WH tours were put on hold people pressed until it was finally determined who made the call. This is exactly what needs to happen here. We need to keep pushing to determine who is making these poor decisions and send them home. Never lose sight of the fact that the government is supposed to work for us and not the other way around. If they fail to perform they need to be fired. Unfortunately this is not the easiest thing to do, but it can be done. We just need to stay on target and not be distracted before the time comes. One of the enumerated powers given to the federal government under the Constitution is protection from foreign invasion. If they are not getting it done they should be replaced post haste.
 
Do you really think that robotic squirrels and pottery lessons for Moroccans are "social services for the middle class and the poor" ?? :roll:

You are a fool if you think that was all they cut. The $800 billion being cut from the defense budget is a lot of money.
 
You are a fool if you think that was all they cut. The $800 billion being cut from the defense budget is a lot of money.

Only a fool would think that robotic squirrels and Moroccan pottery lessons are "social services for the middle class and the poor."
 
Only a fool would think that robotic squirrels and Moroccan pottery lessons are "social services for the middle class and the poor."

Funny but there is no mention of squirrels, robotic or live but there is almost $8 billion in cuts to food stamps in the 1st year. Maybe the poor are supposed to eat the robotic squirrels.

The Sequester Replacement Reconciliation Act would cut $7.7 billion in federal food stamp spending in the first year, require federal workers to contribute more to retirement plans, end grants for health insurance exchanges, put limits on Medicaid payments and impose various reforms aimed at trimming federal spending. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the entire bill would turn off about $72 billion of the sequester, and Republicans say it would save $180 billion over the next decade.

Read more: Sequester replacement bill advances in House - The Hill's Floor Action
Follow us: @thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook
 
Last edited:
The Sequester Replacement Reconciliation Act would cut $7.7 billion in federal food stamp spending in the first year, require federal workers to contribute more to retirement plans, end grants for health insurance exchanges, put limits on Medicaid payments and impose various reforms aimed at trimming federal spending. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the entire bill would turn off about $72 billion of the sequester, and Republicans say it would save $180 billion over the next decade.

Best news I heard all day.
 
Only a fool would think that robotic squirrels and Moroccan pottery lessons are "social services for the middle class and the poor."

Well you do know that with R&D comes those regulations anyways. But notice now you don't hear to much more of Obama running around and using that line. Pretty much stopped once they discovered that Medical Device tax coming thru from Obamacare.
 
The Sequester Replacement Reconciliation Act would cut $7.7 billion in federal food stamp spending in the first year, require federal workers to contribute more to retirement plans, end grants for health insurance exchanges, put limits on Medicaid payments and impose various reforms aimed at trimming federal spending. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the entire bill would turn off about $72 billion of the sequester, and Republicans say it would save $180 billion over the next decade.

Sounds good to me.
 
Back
Top Bottom