- Joined
- Feb 20, 2012
- Messages
- 104,071
- Reaction score
- 84,041
- Location
- Biden's 'Murica
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
Clearly, stealing some cigars is punishable by death without a trial.
I do not know, but suspect, that Officer Wilson has completed some type of formal incident report.Officer Wilson is not going to make any pubic statements regarding the facts of this case while it is under investigation and I certainly wouldn't dismiss the Police Departments statements as third party hearsay. Other than that, there are other third party statements regarding the Officer's version and the statements of Johnson himself.
If that doesn't suit you, then don't comment on it...
Officer Wilson is not going to make any pubic statements regarding the facts of this case while it is under investigation and I certainly wouldn't dismiss the Police Departments statements as third party hearsay. Other than that, there are other third party statements regarding the Officer's version and the statements of Johnson himself.
If that doesn't suit you, then don't comment on it...
Oh yes because the Ferguson PD has no history of corruption and we should just take their word for it and not dismiss it.
Didn't you just point out how people can lie to make themselves or perhaps their own police department look good....
Do whatever you want...
Yes, I did...and that includes you....
They don't contradict each other. When Officer Wilson initially encountered Brown and his friend walking in the middle of the street and interfering with traffic, he didn't know about the robbery. Only later, when Wilson pulled forward to observe them, did he receive the call about the robbery.
Oh come on Rocket, you don't really believe that's what happened, do you?
IF that was believable, what prompt him to leave the "sick call"? That was what Chief Jackson said.
No, but then I really don't see where this comes in to play. Yeah, maybe he stole some cigars. Maybe not. At any rate, it shouldn't make a difference in why he would have gotten shot and killed.
No, but then I really don't see where this comes in to play. Yeah, maybe he stole some cigars. Maybe not. At any rate, it shouldn't make a difference in why he would have gotten shot and killed.
That's a very simplistic way of looking at things. It certainly would have affected how Brown perceived the Police Officer, and quite likely, how the Police Officer perceived Brown. Initially, Brown and his friend were merely a nuisance in the road and then they became robbery suspects. That completely changes the dynamics of the interaction between them. Maybe Brown couldn't afford to get into any more trouble, for whatever reason. To suggest that the robbery is irrelevant to what happened afterward is simply naïve.
You might as well just come out and say, if the autopsy don't fit, you must acquit, because that's what such naivete amounts to...
I would say that if the autopsy don't fit you must acquit. If the evidence doesn't fit the cop's story, then that would make a big difference in the case.
I would say that if the autopsy don't fit you must acquit. If the evidence doesn't fit the cop's story, then that would make a big difference in the case.
Has anybody considered that his friend wasn't lying at all. That they did rob the store, and that he was surrendering? It's not out of the question, I don't think.
Arms above the head, in a surrender position, can not account for multiple wounds from a single round, and there are at least two rounds that caused multiple wounds. That's why these idiots at the Press conference came out with these wild hypotheticals about additional rounds being fired. That's all they have to try and explain away the obvious....
The original witness said Brown was laying down with hands up when executed. The news has since changed it to "had hands up" while leaving the layign part down.
This isn't the official autopsy and the doctor doing it is not the coroner.
Ya, well, bully on me for suggesting an idiom that you were likely to run with. Where the hell did you go to school, at Our Lady of childlike understanding?
This isn't the official autopsy and the doctor doing it is not the coroner.
:doh
The only holes are in the accounts against the Officer.
His account has no holes in it.
So, no attention should be paid to the evidence?
We get that you think Brown deserved it.
but all evidence that you don't like should be ignored?
Sounds about right...:roll:
It does show him at the counter. It is true that you can't tell if he paid or not. However, you don't know that he didn't.
The lawyer who stated that the store did not report a robbery was the store's lawyer.
No he did not.The original witness said Brown was laying down with hands up when executed. The news has since changed it to "had hands up" while leaving the layign part down.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?