• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Bring Back Dueling?

Should dueling be re-instated under extreme conditions

  • Yes, maybe a little civility and honesty will return to politics

    Votes: 10 58.8%
  • No, because legally sanctioned violence is wrong

    Votes: 4 23.5%
  • No, because we still need Democrats as an alternative party

    Votes: 3 17.6%
  • No, because we still need republicans as an alternative party

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    17
LaMidRighter said:
That's a really good point, normally it was an arm or leg shot, I guess it all depended on how heated the argument got though.
The number of paces taken by the duelers was determined by how great the grievance was. Greater grievances equaled less paces and a better chance of hitting your opponent.

The Code Duello outlines the rules of dueling used in America.
 
UtahBill said:
So, you admit to brain washing using propaganda as the detergent?

Unlike you "democrats" we National Socialists choose to follow our Weltanschauung.
 
I like the idea because we need a few less career incumbants. Since they stacked elections in their favor so much, it's hard to vote them out.

But fo course, this isn't a good measure of Justice, since the guy with the quicker hand will win, short of divine intervention.

I say we go puritan style, and the two will be tied up, bound to an 800lb rock, and tossed into the patomic, and if they float, they are honest. this doesn't depend much on any skill. Short of divine intervention, we get two new congresspersons.
 
FinnMacCool said:
Whats that? a giant penis?

HAHA no its a world view or macro philosophy of sorts. Normally, you hear it in a much more benign sense than from Aryan.
 
jallman said:
HAHA no its a world view or macro philosophy of sorts. Normally, you hear it in a much more benign sense than from Aryan.


did you know that many of the SS sadists were pedophiles? some of the stuff they did to young jewish boys-who were often strangled by the sadists would serve as a basis for a porn snuff film for the most radical of NAMBLA flamers

the good news is most of those vermin were summarily shot by allied soldiers when caught. My dad knew a classmate who was in a mechanized infantry unit that liberated one of the camps. They lined the SS scum up and machine gunned them with a couple jeeps armed with Brownings
 
TurtleDude said:
did you know that many of the SS sadists were pedophiles? some of the stuff they did to young jewish boys-who were often strangled by the sadists would serve as a basis for a porn snuff film for the most radical of NAMBLA flamers

the good news is most of those vermin were summarily shot by allied soldiers when caught. My dad knew a classmate who was in a mechanized infantry unit that liberated one of the camps. They lined the SS scum up and machine gunned them with a couple jeeps armed with Brownings

Good, any pedophile deserves that whether they were nazis, americans, or even catholic priests. That type of behavior is intolerable.
 
jallman said:
Good, any pedophile deserves that whether they were nazis, americans, or even catholic priests. That type of behavior is intolerable.


agreed. I don't know (being in Cincinnati where there is a large epidemic of sick priests) if many of those priests are pedophiles since most of the boys they molest are post puberty. hitting on a 16 year old male is illegal and immoral but not pedophilia. I am not blaming gays for this either any more than blaming straights for a 30 year old guy diddling a 16 year old girl
 
TurtleDude said:
agreed. I don't know (being in Cincinnati where there is a large epidemic of sick priests) if many of those priests are pedophiles since most of the boys they molest are post puberty. hitting on a 16 year old male is illegal and immoral but not pedophilia. I am not blaming gays for this either any more than blaming straights for a 30 year old guy diddling a 16 year old girl

That is a pretty progressive way of thinking...I have found myself ogling a 17 year old a couple of times and then upon the finding out his age, was almost horrified. I will say, some 16-17 year olds (boys and girls) definitely dont look it. Hell, I met my boyfriend when he was 19, he lied and told me he was 21 and I believed it until the first time we went to a bar and he couldnt get in. By then, we had been dating for over six months. That was a few years ago now. LOL

I wonder what it is about turning 30 that makes younger men and women so attractive to us? I know when I was younger (like 18) I only wanted to date 22-30 year olds because I thought the boys my age didnt look like men yet. Now I am thirty...boning an 18 year old would be at the top of my list if I ever get "divorced" LOL
 
jallman said:
That is a pretty progressive way of thinking...I have found myself ogling a 17 year old a couple of times and then upon the finding out his age, was almost horrified. I will say, some 16-17 year olds (boys and girls) definitely dont look it. Hell, I met my boyfriend when he was 19, he lied and told me he was 21 and I believed it until the first time we went to a bar and he couldnt get in. By then, we had been dating for over six months. That was a few years ago now. LOL

I wonder what it is about turning 30 that makes younger men and women so attractive to us? I know when I was younger (like 18) I only wanted to date 22-30 year olds because I thought the boys my age didnt look like men yet. Now I am thirty...boning an 18 year old would be at the top of my list if I ever get "divorced" LOL


I am 46-I have a hard time telling 16 year olds from 20 year olds in some cases. face it, in prior times, 14 and 15 year olds were having kids. Romeo and Juliet were based on 14 year olds I read some place.

My definition of a pedophile-lusting for a child who has not reached the age of being able to reproduce. That is purely abnormal. Lusting for a sexually mature individual is immoral in many cases but that is different from being abnormal
 
Back
Top Bottom