• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Brett's medicine.

BrettNortje

Banned
Joined
Jul 14, 2016
Messages
793
Reaction score
22
Location
Cape Town
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
I have found that injections and tablets, that are hard to get down sometimes, can be replaced by 'poppers.' this would be where you make a gaseous generic of the chemicals that you are using and then breathing them in, straight to your lungs, for faster results.

Of course, due to the diluted nature of the poppers, you might need to take two or three, yes?
 
Now, for something to impress you, i am going to cure aids and cancer, again, because i feel like it.

Aids is a horrible disease that infects cells and goes inside them so the white blood cells cannot 'find' them. this is a great way to infect the cell, and, when the cell divides, the aids divides too, with the cell, spreading infection. to kill that bloody aids you need to either go inside the cell with it, or you need to get it out of the cell to kill it, or, stop the cell from dividing and it will die in the cell, as the cell dies. this can be done by, in my past cures, insulating some nitrogen, which is poisonous in large amounts - as everything is poisonous to us outside our bodies, from sunlight to food - and place it inside a protein that goes into the cells, or a carbohydrate or something. then, the nitrogen will be released from a capsule, which is inside the 'penetrator,' and consume the aids with poison. an alternative to this would be to use something like trace amounts of bleach that will completely wipe the aids from the cell, yes? you just got to know which cells to look for, or, the protein does. this means that the cells taking in too much oxygen or proteins, due to desperation for survival, will form a whirl pool around them, and therefore we could find a balance between normal navigation and less resistance to these sucking effects.

Another of my aids cures was to simply use antibiotics and kill all the cells, while at the same time using viagra to boost cell division of what is left, in the actual organs, yes?

Another of my aids cures was to place small white blood cells inside vast sums of 'food cells' to penetrate the cells and if everything is hunky dory, then there will be no problem, but if that pesky aids cells is inside, then, you know... vast sums!

Cancer is a native disease, so is hard for the white blood cells to fight. this would lead to the cells ignoring the cancer and then 'floating away.' the way to kill cancer is to get the flu, as this attacks native cells. getting a simple disease like that for a while will penetrate clusters of 'bacteria like cancer junk' and reduce it to manageable levels for a long time, of course.

Another cure for cancer would be to stop the cells dividing. this could be done by telling the the cells that they are both male or both female, and, that will leave them without a procedure to 'divide.' of course, if the cells do not divide, they will go extinct, yes?

Maybe if the cancer was to be observed as old tissue, then it would resemble the pollution of your system with dead cells. this can easily be cured by using oxygen masks or some other clean gas to clear this 'rot.'

But, i have no certification thus far with medicine, this is merely quakery.
 
I want to make a new antibiotic, that will wipe out more diseases. the way antibiotics work is to use green mold of some sort to infect and kill the bacteria. hmmm... maybe i want to make an anti virus?

To make this anti virus, we would need to observe that mold will not kill viruses. instead, we should observe that the virus spreads from cell to cell, so, we would want to use bacteria to kill the virus, as the virus is more evolved than bacteria, and the bacteria is smaller than the virus, like the bacteria to cells, a virus is also 'cells.'

So, we want to make a anti virus that kills viruses, maybe by ingesting some sort of apple seeds, that have something in them, a poison, called cyanide, that is biological or biomass and will not harm the body unless in high amounts. the thing is, enough of it will kill the viruses.
 
Maybe the best way to go about medical cures and remedies is to observe that everything man made - the chemicals mixed in labs - comes from nature itself. this is how medicine is made, especially removing harmful things from the natural world's ingredients and then super charging chemicals to be more aggressive towards diseases.

I have a theory where the medicine men of the past were visited by aliens and showed them how to cure any disease with herbs and plants. this worked for a while and that is why they became popular and well thought of, and, eventually some immoral people were also trying to make medicine without knowing what they were doing, and the state of 'natural medicine' was abandoned in favor of studying the diseases themselves.

Well, today we have natural remedies packed into pills and injections, of course. today we want to get what the plants do down to a science, so we can further eradicate diseases from the world. i still believe any disease can be cured by using plants and spices for this.

So, where do we begin? we know mold is the thing that kills bacteria - a very simple cure called insulin, yes? then, what about 'light spices?' this could be used for mucous build ups, like from colds, to eradicate the cold completely. the cold comes fro having too much phlegm in our stomachs and lungs, i think - somewhere down there? - and then the body will try to get rid of the cold by creating mucous to come to the mouth to get rid of it. this is like sneezing your germs out or puking to get rid of bad food, it is the only thing the body can think of doing.

I suppose that eating 'thin spices' would help the cold symptoms, and the symptoms is what we do not want from the disease, yes? i mean, you can still have the flu, but at the same time you will not suffer any symptoms. spices eat away at mucous like salt eats away at a snail, you could say, yes?
 
Another huge segment of ailments is 'dryness.' this is for many diseases, where, the bacteria is causing irritation of the lungs or other parts of the body. this is common in non european countries, as they have more lively bacteria than europe, of course.

So, if you have tuberculosis then you need to stop the dryness instead of dealing with mucous. in fact, causing mucous would do it regarding stopping the irritation, which as we have already found, is caused by 'dryness.' this could be done by devouring 'thicker' liquids, of course, like milk and syrups. the best one, i find, is inhaling vaseline and having that thick stuff go right to your lungs, or eating it and seeing it go straight to your stomach, yes?

So, if you cough, you should use lubricants, if you full of mucous you should use salt.
 
So medicine is simple. you got a obvious problem, you got an obvious answer. this means that if you need a cure for some symptoms, you only need to read my notes to find out what to do. but, i will recap some of my natural remedies for things, and new things too.

Let's ignore what has happened in the past, let's go for new cures?

So, tuberculosis is a dryness in the lungs and throat. this is easily remedied by inhaling vicks or tiger balm. this will get rid of the symptoms, so there is no difference between the disease being there or not. but, let's look for a cure for this disease?

Maybe if we were to observe that tuberculosis is a bacterial infection of the lungs, we could merely use antibiotics, but, how do we make this more 'natural?' smoking will make the disease also 'fade away,' as this poison, that harms the lungs, will also harm the bacteria, but this would be in very minor amounts.

Of course, if we were to observe that we will get sick if we were to drink 'some cleaning substances,' we could nuke the bacteria in the three minutes it is down there, then puke up the rest of it, leaving the rest of the body unharmed. this cleaning stuff is made with things that kill any living thing, like bacteria on the floor, so work as a artificial poison for the diseases out there.

Maybe if we were to observe that parkinson's disease is a brain abnormality, then we could 'cure' that with some 'microwave popcorn.' this must be eaten while still hot, as then this is evidence of the electricity in the pop corn still being active, leading to cheap electro therapy of some sort for the 'head.'

Or, we could simply rub our heads, generating static electricity for the stimulation of brain activity.
 
With a lot of diseases coming from the bush or forests and jungles, we need to eradicate these deadly diseases, by spreading 'cures' of our own. these cures could be ingested into people that go into the bush or jungle to get bitten and then they will spread genes with these 'cures' for the mosquitoes and such things to spread themselves through mating with the rest of the mosquito populations.

So, what will our 'cure' consist of? i suggest they use some antibiotics rife in the system of the person, to take dead disease cells back into the mosquito population, and then there will be aggressive cells eating the dead cells of the disease, without them fighting back, and then continuing to feed off them in active environments.
 
Antibiotics don't kill viruses, genius.
 
From the OP's second post, "Now, for something to impress you, i am going to cure aids and cancer, again, because i feel like it."

Is the OP cruel in that the cure was not presented in detail? The OP could win a Nobel if it was true. imo, time to move this to the CT section.
 
From the OP's second post, "Now, for something to impress you, i am going to cure aids and cancer, again, because i feel like it."

Is the OP cruel in that the cure was not presented in detail? The OP could win a Nobel if it was true. imo, time to move this to the CT section.

stay tuned for the Noble Prize presentation

but

don't hold your breath
 
From the OP's second post, "Now, for something to impress you, i am going to cure aids and cancer, again, because i feel like it."

Is the OP cruel in that the cure was not presented in detail? The OP could win a Nobel if it was true. imo, time to move this to the CT section.

I am sorry, i had all these people telling me over and over elsewhere that i know nothing about 'pharmacology.' i feel i have a unique understanding of how chemicals react in organics.
 
I am sorry, i had all these people telling me over and over elsewhere that i know nothing about 'pharmacology.' i feel i have a unique understanding of how chemicals react in organics.

You don't. You say things that are fundamentally wrong. On every subject you post on.

It is the height of arrogance to believe yourself to be a genius in every field.
 
I am sorry, i had all these people telling me over and over elsewhere that i know nothing about 'pharmacology.' i feel i have a unique understanding of how chemicals react in organics.

and yet, you do not post what your "cure" is. Why is that?
 
I am sorry, i had all these people telling me over and over elsewhere that i know nothing about 'pharmacology.' i feel i have a unique understanding of how chemicals react in organics.

You don't.
 
Now it comes to "resurrection." this would be like , eventually, making people come back to life - in what state i don't know - and fruit pips being grafted back into the full fruit, for full consumption. the fundamental theory here is that mass is stored energy, of course.

So, if you have the bones of people, they carry all the genes the person had up until the time they died. this means that you can reproduce the physical form of the person and memories to some degree, or fully with more research by doctors, and then the exact impulses that they had will come back to the body due to the energies the body had at the time of death. the thing is, the person might come back having seen heaven or something, of course, and then have a great story to tell, yes?

If we were to take the decomposing bones, or, even a photograph, we could simulate this with some certainty that each wrinkle on the outside of the face, and, every scar on the body needs to be identical to an atomic level for the person to be brought back "exactly as they were" before they died. this is because our bodies are merely nerves, that make a complexion for us that represents what is going on inside our bodies, of course.

Of course if we have the bones, the actual d.n.a, then we could merely reproduce this, at least in a test tube, regenerating the physical form of the person. this would result in, for lack of a better example, something like the water cycle, or, 'the circle of life.'

~ Remember that the body of the person is only a 'collection of nerves.' when nerves feel things, they change for each thing they feel, permanently. this forms the person, there is no hocus pocus consciousness and memories that are stored like photographs. they are merely impressions of the persons experiences.

If you have the ashes of someone, then you could simply 'revitalize them.' this would be where you revert the ashes to cells, by taking the blue print of the genes, as if it were a forest fire leaving behind a mountain with fissures and details of ground, by lubricating them to 'revitalize them.' this follows the forest fire cycle of course, except we are taking the ashes and rewinding them.

For the vegetables and fruit, we merely need to take the genes of the fruit, from a little bit of it, then 'copy' this code to file, then replicate it.
 
I'm sorry, but am I the only poster who feels that the suck of this thread is as strong as the gravitational field of a black hole?
 
Now it comes to "resurrection." this would be like , eventually, making people come back to life - in what state i don't know - and fruit pips being grafted back into the full fruit, for full consumption. the fundamental theory here is that mass is stored energy, of course.

So, if you have the bones of people, they carry all the genes the person had up until the time they died. this means that you can reproduce the physical form of the person and memories to some degree, or fully with more research by doctors, and then the exact impulses that they had will come back to the body due to the energies the body had at the time of death. the thing is, the person might come back having seen heaven or something, of course, and then have a great story to tell, yes?

If we were to take the decomposing bones, or, even a photograph, we could simulate this with some certainty that each wrinkle on the outside of the face, and, every scar on the body needs to be identical to an atomic level for the person to be brought back "exactly as they were" before they died. this is because our bodies are merely nerves, that make a complexion for us that represents what is going on inside our bodies, of course.

Of course if we have the bones, the actual d.n.a, then we could merely reproduce this, at least in a test tube, regenerating the physical form of the person. this would result in, for lack of a better example, something like the water cycle, or, 'the circle of life.'

~ Remember that the body of the person is only a 'collection of nerves.' when nerves feel things, they change for each thing they feel, permanently. this forms the person, there is no hocus pocus consciousness and memories that are stored like photographs. they are merely impressions of the persons experiences.

If you have the ashes of someone, then you could simply 'revitalize them.' this would be where you revert the ashes to cells, by taking the blue print of the genes, as if it were a forest fire leaving behind a mountain with fissures and details of ground, by lubricating them to 'revitalize them.' this follows the forest fire cycle of course, except we are taking the ashes and rewinding them.

For the vegetables and fruit, we merely need to take the genes of the fruit, from a little bit of it, then 'copy' this code to file, then replicate it.

Oh look it's the guy who thinks he knows more than every expert in every field. He's back.

Brett, how do you internally justify your unbelievable arrogance?
 
Oh look it's the guy who thinks he knows more than every expert in every field. He's back.

Brett, how do you internally justify your unbelievable arrogance?

I just smile...
 
Now it comes to "resurrection." this would be like , eventually, making people come back to life - in what state i don't know - and fruit pips being grafted back into the full fruit, for full consumption. the fundamental theory here is that mass is stored energy, of course.

So, if you have the bones of people, they carry all the genes the person had up until the time they died. this means that you can reproduce the physical form of the person and memories to some degree, or fully with more research by doctors, and then the exact impulses that they had will come back to the body due to the energies the body had at the time of death. the thing is, the person might come back having seen heaven or something, of course, and then have a great story to tell, yes?

If we were to take the decomposing bones, or, even a photograph, we could simulate this with some certainty that each wrinkle on the outside of the face, and, every scar on the body needs to be identical to an atomic level for the person to be brought back "exactly as they were" before they died. this is because our bodies are merely nerves, that make a complexion for us that represents what is going on inside our bodies, of course.

Of course if we have the bones, the actual d.n.a, then we could merely reproduce this, at least in a test tube, regenerating the physical form of the person. this would result in, for lack of a better example, something like the water cycle, or, 'the circle of life.'

~ Remember that the body of the person is only a 'collection of nerves.' when nerves feel things, they change for each thing they feel, permanently. this forms the person, there is no hocus pocus consciousness and memories that are stored like photographs. they are merely impressions of the persons experiences.

If you have the ashes of someone, then you could simply 'revitalize them.' this would be where you revert the ashes to cells, by taking the blue print of the genes, as if it were a forest fire leaving behind a mountain with fissures and details of ground, by lubricating them to 'revitalize them.' this follows the forest fire cycle of course, except we are taking the ashes and rewinding them.

For the vegetables and fruit, we merely need to take the genes of the fruit, from a little bit of it, then 'copy' this code to file, then replicate it.

If I die in a fire do I get a discount at the crematorium?
 
Back
Top Bottom