If you can't prove it, you're wrong. It is not possible to get a warrant for shooting someone five times in her own home for no good reason.
Your commentary is as idiotic as it is wrong.
Proof? The news briefing they held confirmed it.
She was in the hallway of the apartment with the shooter.
If you do not understand the significance of that, something is wrong with the way you view things.
It does not matter where she was. She did nothing wrong. Period. It was murder.
So you do not understand the significance of her position next to the shooter.
Figures.
Well you are wrong. It was not murder, nor could it ever be.
There is no criminal culpability on the part of the police for her death.
It was a wrongful death under legal circumstances which goes to civil liability, of which, compensation was already given.
Because the person they shot was unarmed, they were not "returning fire" in this case.
Oy vey! Talk about stupid replies.
They were indeed returning fire.
She was in that line of fire becasue she was standing with the shooter in the hallway of that apartment.
They had no right to shoot an unarmed black woman in her own home, period. Kenneth Walker did not give police any justification for killing Breonna Taylor.
You are using words that really have no applicability here.
"Right"? iLOL There is no applicability in how you used it. But they did have the right to do as they did, which is why there is no criminality in their actions in shooting her.
Your use of "justification" is also inapplicable. The compensation her family received is justified becasue of her wrongful death. But there was no criminal behavior in her wrongful death. The shooting of their weapons in response to being fired upon was found to be justified, which is why there is no criminality in he wrongful death.
If you can't prove it, you're wrong.
This is you showing you do not know what you are talking about.
So in order to not be murder, the police have to prove they had no way of knowing the person who opened fire was Walker, not Taylor.
Wrong. You clearly know not of what you speak.
You don't either if you can't prove me wrong.
Hilarious. Besides not knowing what you are talking about, you do no know to whom you are speaking either.