- Joined
- Jul 24, 2011
- Messages
- 59,631
- Reaction score
- 51,680
- Location
- Georgia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
what would have been a more appropriate charge?
A murder charge. Duh.
what would have been a more appropriate charge?
he ya go
508.060 Wanton endangerment in the first degree. (1) A person is guilty of wanton endangerment in the first degree when, under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life, he wantonly engages in conduct which creates a substantial danger of death or serious physical injury to another person. (2) Wanton endangerment in the first degree is a Class D felony. Effective: January 1, 1975 History: Created 1974 Ky. Acts ch. 406, sec. 70, effective January 1, 1975.
Except the police were wrong. They did break into her house and did murder her in her bed. It was her house and the suspect didn't live there. There really is no perfuming that pig.
Nope this is bullshit a d they know it.
That is why they canceled all LE leaves and put up barricades before the announcement.
If you or I turn the wrong way down a one way street and kill someone in a head o. It's vehicular homicide...
What ever happened to personal responsibility???
Yes, thought crimes.I figured they'd come up with something, just to try to placate the mob. I knew it wouldnt be anything like manslaughter or murder because the police were simply doing their job serving a warrant (one that I think the law should be changed to not allow, but that's a different argument, and it was legal at the time, as much as I and others might dislike it) and the boyfriend shot at them and they returned fire. Sadly this won't placate said terrorist mob - I expect Louisville to be in flames by the evening.
The police were executing a lawful warrant, and were fired on. That takes breaking in and murder off the table. The charged offense is about judgment.Neat, so all I have to do to get off with wanton endangerment before breaking into someone's house and murdering them in their sleep is to become a LEO.
It's better than nothing, but this is not an acceptable outcome.
I guarantee the Grand Jury was given all the information that was available and no jury (whether a grand jury or a trial jury) should make a decision based on threats of violent reactions.
Thanks. I saw it, I'm just saying I never saw it used in a case before. I'm sure it has been, just not in any high profile case that I remember,
I doubt they will get a conviction and then more riots.
Here is an idea, let's get all guns of the streets so these kind of things don't happen!
Then everyone is happy.
Four years after Kaepernick took a knee, you STILL refuse to acknowledge why people are protesting police brutality.
Except the gun fluffers. They would melt down at such a suggestion.
The police were executing a lawful warrant,
and were fired on.
That takes breaking in and murder off the table. The charged offense is about judgment.
I can understand protesting police brutality
Exactly, then more Burning, Looting, Murder.Of course it won’t satisfy cop haters, but if something is overcharged to satisfy mobs, it makes and acquittal even more likely.
The warrant was still legal, and the police were still fired upon. Breaking in and murder can't be charged.They broke into the wrong house.
What the hell did you expect Breonna's BF to do when people break into their home? They did not announce that they were police. BF had no way to know that those were the cops and was reacting just like any law-abiding gun owner would.
Now if you want to get going in a discussion about whether the castle doctrine should be removed from one's domicile, then I am all ears.
Irrelevant for the reasons above.
with those apples and oranges we have a nice fruit saladNope this is bullshit a d they know it.
That is why they canceled all LE leaves and put up barricades before the announcement.
If you or I turn the wrong way down a one way street and kill someone in a head o. It's vehicular homicide...
What ever happened to personal responsibility???
The warrant was still legal,
and the police were still fired upon.
Breaking in and murder can't be charged.
THey got a warrent approval from a lazy judge over the phone, aka they were drug cops that were buddy, buddy with the judge and they abused their position. The judge should be fired too.It is not breaking in when you have an approved warrant. Nor was anyone murdered in their sleep AFAIK.
Anyone truly outraged by this needs to be backing Rand Paul's bill to be rid of no-knock warrants.
The warrant was still legal, and the police were still fired upon. Breaking in and murder can't be charged.
Breonna Taylor shooting: Louisville officer indicted on criminal charges
One of three officers involved in the Louisville, Ky., drug operation that led to the police shooting death of Breonna Taylor in March 2020 was indicted Wednesday on criminal charges.www.foxnews.com
Too much? Not enough?
It is not breaking in when you have an approved warrant. Nor was anyone murdered in their sleep AFAIK.
Anyone truly outraged by this needs to be backing Rand Paul's bill to be rid of no-knock warrants.
post 31 answers that very capably:A murder charge. Duh.
post 31 answers that very capably:
please point out the lieNo it doesn't. Stop lying.